Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:16:47 -0700
From:      Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>
To:        Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Andrey Simonenko <simon@comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: kern/92880: [libc] [patch] almost rewritten inet_network(3) function
Message-ID:  <CAGH67wR%2B227dMWF0hdc2GFrYmJi=xUWqpWsGkhPT_ngmwXTeeQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmomcmWEBWAeBboomwqk3X0D09qGdXxyuw5yiuj0W5zkDbg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201210230840.q9N8e038066538@freefall.freebsd.org> <CAJ-VmomcmWEBWAeBboomwqk3X0D09qGdXxyuw5yiuj0W5zkDbg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote:
> ... don't suppose you want to throw this into a test case somewhere in the tree?
>
> The new ATF import would be ideal for this. :)

    Indeed. The only problem is that bsd.test.mk is missing so you
can't really integrate testcases into the build *quite* yet, but I can
work with you to write up/review the testcase; I have the missing
ATF/test infrastructure pieces committed to perforce (but I broke
things working on adding fixtures) and will be migrating everything
over to github soon (so that way my hacking is more isolated and more
collaboration can occur).
Thanks!
-Garrett



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGH67wR%2B227dMWF0hdc2GFrYmJi=xUWqpWsGkhPT_ngmwXTeeQ>