Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 14:37:20 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 205939] www/lighttpd-mod_*: Mark Un'BROKEN Message-ID: <bug-205939-13-JGMrRNCHqS@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-205939-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-205939-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D205939 --- Comment #4 from Piotr Kubaj <pkubaj@anongoth.pl> --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #3) I've created repos on: https://github.com/pkubaj/lighttpd-mod_h264_streaming https://github.com/pkubaj/lighttpd-mod_geoip It may seem clumsy, but I don't know git at all :) There's no history, curr= ent official websites of these mods are: http://h264.code-shop.com/trac/wiki/Mod-H264-Streaming-Lighttpd-Version2 http://redmine.lighttpd.net/projects/1/wiki/Docs_ModGeoip As you can see, there's no revision control at all. Now some question: those ports don't have distfile. They're built on top of current version of Lighttpd with the actual distfile in patch, specified as: PATCH_SITES+=3D LOCAL/mm PATCHFILES+=3D lighttpd-1.4.26_mod_geoip.patch.gz Since I can't use GH_* macros in patches, would it be acceptable if I set it as: PATCH_SITES+=3D https://github.com/pkubaj/lighttpd-mod_geoip/archive PATCHFILES+=3D 2.2.10.tar.gz And then, can I use tar.gz with patches, or at least zip? Otherwise, the ports in question would have to be rewritten. That's why I'd prefer to host them on my own server :) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-205939-13-JGMrRNCHqS>