Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 11:24:57 -0600 (MDT) From: Nick Rogness <nick@rapidnet.com> To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> Cc: Steve Shah <sshah@clickarray.com>, Olaf Hoyer <ohoyer@fbwi.fh-wilhelmshaven.de>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BPF vs. promiscuous mode Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10005241122320.48936-100000@rapidnet.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005241100330.21250-100000@achilles.silby.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 24 May 2000, Mike Silbersack wrote: [snip] > > Bah! I'm giving you the no fun network administrator badge. NATing might > help in the short-term, but it also breaks stuff like ICQ/video games/etc, I have yet to have problems with FreeBSD's NAT working with ICQ or games. Which games are you talking about? Nick Rogness - Speak softly and carry a Gigabit switch. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.10005241122320.48936-100000>