Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 09:40:35 +0100 From: Dominic Marks <dominic_marks@btinternet.com> To: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ¤t;/&stable; entities for consistent naming Message-ID: <20010531094035.A405@host213-123-133-158.btopenworld> In-Reply-To: <20010531052352.E356C3E2F@bazooka.unixfreak.org>; from dima@unixfreak.org on Wed, May 30, 2001 at 10:23:52PM -0700 References: <200105291730.f4THURD60201@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> <20010531052352.E356C3E2F@bazooka.unixfreak.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 10:23:52PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote: > > It's probably of no technical concern, but I like > &os.(current|stable);, so I think we should use that. > > Anybody else have any comments on this or shall I go ahead? Why not go the whole way and put in &os.release; It seems silly to leave it out of the series even though its a snapshot of stable many FreeBSD learners might not know that. Just a thought. > > Thanks, > > Dima Dorfman > dima@unixfreak.org Dominic To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010531094035.A405>