Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 13:02:47 -0500 From: Alan Cox <alc@cs.rice.edu> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Luoqi's patch status Message-ID: <19990423130247.A5317@nonpc.cs.rice.edu> In-Reply-To: <199904231744.KAA54441@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>; from Steve Kargl on Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 10:44:20AM -0700 References: <199904231744.KAA54441@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 10:44:20AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > What is the status of Luoqi's smp patches? Is this the > direction that smp on FreeBSD is going, and are these patches > slated for inclusion in source tree? > After considerable discussion of the trade-offs and alternatives among John, David, Bruce, Luoqi (of course), Julian and myself, the consensus was to proceed with Luoqi's %fs-based SMP patch. The downside of this approach is that it increases the null syscall cost by about 8%. Otherwise, the decision would have been a no-brainer. Alan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990423130247.A5317>