From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 17:39:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D06E4FB6; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 17:39:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8845016D4; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 17:39:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nine.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp-int.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8933A6F9D; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 17:39:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nine.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CB7373F0; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 19:39:19 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: David Chisnall Subject: Re: svn commit: r264265 - in head: crypto/openssl/crypto/bn crypto/openssl/crypto/ec crypto/openssl/ssl sys/fs/nfsserver References: <201404081827.s38IRXiL048987@svn.freebsd.org> <86bnwa7gav.fsf@nine.des.no> <534556EB.5080700@FreeBSD.org> <323CC215-6DA6-4C8F-A5DA-72C3CB76566A@cl.cam.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 19:39:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: <323CC215-6DA6-4C8F-A5DA-72C3CB76566A@cl.cam.ac.uk> (David Chisnall's message of "Wed, 9 Apr 2014 17:08:09 +0100") Message-ID: <8638hm1jy0.fsf@nine.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, koobs@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Bryan Drewery , Xin LI , secteam@FreeBSD.org, Kubilay Kocak , svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 17:39:20 -0000 David Chisnall writes: > I noticed that freebsd-update told me (after the fetch phase) that I > should rebuild all third-party software. This is boilerplate, just like the section in the advisory that tells you to make buildworld && make installworld when in fact all you have to do is make && make install in a single directory (which was not the case here, but was certainly the case for SA-13:14, SA-14:01 and SA-14:02 as well as EN-13:04 and EN-13:05, to pick a few recent examples). > I don't know if there are any packages that statically link to > libssl.a It seems like a fundamentally dumb thing to do, but you never know... > (or even if we have a mechanism for determining that), You can try grepping the binaries. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no