From owner-freebsd-alpha Wed Jun 6 7:36:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from beppo.feral.com (beppo.feral.com [192.67.166.79]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060BD37B403; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 07:36:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from beppo (mjacob@beppo [192.67.166.79]) by beppo.feral.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f56Eang16585; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 07:36:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 07:36:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: "David O'Brien" Cc: Andrew Gallatin , Freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: -current kernel still considered dangerous In-Reply-To: <20010606072708.A96129@dragon.nuxi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Unlike Solaris, modules are not essential to run FreeBSD. I think debugging this by fixing 'debugging modules' is at best a 3rd order priority. On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, David O'Brien wrote: > On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 10:11:05AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > > > I just built a kernel statically & found it. > > I was hoping to learn how to debug modules. Is there no way we would > have found this w/o building OSF1 support statically in the kernel? > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message