Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 15:30:27 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/smbmsg - Imported sources Message-ID: <xzpekpjb2q4.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20040517145813.C53564@uriah.heep.sax.de> (Joerg Wunsch's message of "Mon, 17 May 2004 14:58:13 %2B0200") References: <200405171056.i4HAu6aX016271@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040517111803.GC16904@ip.net.ua> <20040517143417.B53564@uriah.heep.sax.de> <xzpisevb4v2.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040517145813.C53564@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Joerg Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> writes: > As Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > > > Nope, but I've kept in mind that adding complete new subsystems > > > etc. is better done by an import as opposed to just cvs adding it. > > No, it isn't. It's easier than 'cvs add', but still wrong. > I wouldn't it consider to be easier, but since you're not taking care > to explain why it were wrong, it's becoming a bikeshed discussion. 'cvs import' places the files on a separate branch and creates a branch tag for that branch and a point tag for the import. It is intended for files which you get from a third party and to which you make local changes. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpekpjb2q4.fsf>