Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:32:56 +0000 From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: uipc_socket2.c sbflush question Message-ID: <20040115173256.GA31297@walton.maths.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: <4006BC29.7CAE053B@freebsd.org> References: <4006BC29.7CAE053B@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 05:13:29PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote: > Why is sbdrop() called directly instead of sbflush()? I think it makes > more sense to change that to a call to sbflush() which then DTRT? If I remember correctly, it was to deal with the fact that soisdisconnected is sometimes called without the socket being locked, but sbflush required the socket to have SB_LOCK set. (You used to get a panic fairly quickly if you did s/sbdrop/sbflush/) David.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040115173256.GA31297>