From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 22 17:51:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528721065670 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:51:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nec556@retena.com) Received: from resmaa12.ono.com (smtp12.ono.com [62.42.230.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D61628FC16 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:51:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from GogPortatil.retena.com (188.76.0.243) by resmaa12.ono.com (8.5.113) (authenticated as nec556@retena.com) id 4D301C9702253683; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 19:51:08 +0200 Message-ID: <4D301C9702253683@> (added by postmaster@resmaa12.ono.com) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 19:50:59 +0200 To: "Michael W. Lucas" From: Eduardo Morras In-Reply-To: <20110721151210.GA47663@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> References: <20110720160432.GA41775@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <4D6348DC01B1E406@> <20110720191640.GA42821@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <4D301C9702145855@> <20110721141011.GB47190@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <4D7F86D5017EB3D8@> <20110721151210.GA47663@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Antivirus: AVG for E-mail 10.0.1390 [1518/3781] Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em0 NIC slow on 8.2-p1 amd64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:51:18 -0000 At 17:12 21/07/2011, Michael W. Lucas wrote: >On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 05:01:57PM +0200, Eduardo Morras wrote: > > > > Have you tried other protocols? Http, rsync... It maybe a problem at > > client side, some ftp clients can set a maximun ftp transfer, like > > filezilla, winscp, > >FTP and NFSv3 both have similar results. > >==ml Perhaps you have reached the maximum disk speed. Sorry not more ideas, but it doesn't look like a nic problem. Put the file in cache before sending it. If it's faster the problem is a bottleneck on hard disk or sata/ata/usb bus. HTH