Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:41:56 -0800 (PST) From: Looza <elias_nogueira@hotmail.com> To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem simulating a LFN Message-ID: <7955491.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <cb5206420612172037j178c3389l8f6429928ef30c2b@mail.gmail.com> References: <7922408.post@talk.nabble.com> <cb5206420612172037j178c3389l8f6429928ef30c2b@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
About the offloading, it might be just that but I not sure and I don't have time to explore this situation. I'm using 2 SMC9452TX and 1 SMC9452TX-1. The delay issue was because of the TCP buffers, I had configured them but the changes weren't permanent. infofarmer wrote: > > On 12/18/06, Looza <elias_nogueira@hotmail.com> wrote: >> My first question is if anyone knows off some way to >> get the processing out of the CPU so that I can achieve >> gigabit speeds without ? > > Like you already noticed, better NICs help. BTW, which > ones do you have? See drivers' manpages for info about > hardware offloading. Also, have a look at polling(4), it > might (or might not) help. > >> My second question is if there is a way of setting the >> ipfw delay option so that it does not alter the throughput? > > You'll have to read ipfw(8) for that. In short, you might > have to increase the queue size so that it can hold 100ms > worth of traffic. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/problem-simulating-a-LFN-tf2837638.html#a7955491 Sent from the freebsd-ipfw mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7955491.post>