Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 Sep 1997 02:28:52 -0700
From:      David Greenman <dg@root.com>
To:        Ruslan Ermilov <ru@ucb.crimea.ua>
Cc:        tarkhil@mgt.msk.ru, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: your mail 
Message-ID:  <199709260928.CAA22718@implode.root.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 26 Sep 1997 10:53:42 %2B0300." <199709260753.KAA01057@relay.ucb.crimea.ua> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>I'm using 3 EtherExpress cards:
>
>fxp0 <Intel EtherExpress Pro 10/100B Ethernet> rev 2 int a irq 10 on pci0:10
>fxp0: Ethernet address 00:a0:c9:55:13:22
>fxp1 <Intel EtherExpress Pro 10/100B Ethernet> rev 1 int a irq 9 on pci0:12
>fxp1: Ethernet address 00:a0:c9:10:68:a0, 10Mbps
>fxp2 <Intel EtherExpress Pro 10/100B Ethernet> rev 1 int a irq 9 on pci0:14
>fxp2: Ethernet address 00:a0:c9:5a:51:f9, 10Mbps
>
>Sometimes, ~ 1/2 per week, my fxp0, which is revision 2 card, silently freezes.
>When I `ifconfig down delete fxp0' and then ifconfig it up, the situation
>resolves.

   If this is true, then Intel has apparantly lied to me about fixing the
problem in the "next stepping" of the chip. The lock up should only occur
when garbage bits occur in the preamble of a packet. It's not supposed to
happen in 100Mbps mode (only 10Mbps), but since I've personnally been able
to get it to happen in 100Mbps, I don't believe it. I can reproduce the
problem only under special circumstance like power-cycling the hub.
   You might try using the "link0 link1 -link2" flags on the 100Mbps link
to force it to stay in 100/half...this might prevent the lock up from
occuring (but I've not tested this myself).

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709260928.CAA22718>