From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 23 15:41:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E48C1065672; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:41:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ruben@verweg.com) Received: from erg.verweg.com (erg.verweg.com [IPv6:2a02:898:96::5e8e:f508]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5AA98FC08; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:41:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.27] (helium.xs4all.nl [83.163.52.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by erg.verweg.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o1NFe7OK030360 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:40:14 GMT (envelope-from ruben@verweg.com) X-Authentication-Warning: erg.verweg.com: Host helium.xs4all.nl [83.163.52.241] claimed to be [192.168.1.27] Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Ruben van Staveren In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:40:07 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4DA9D015-9AB7-4D10-89CA-DF087F0F5FC8@verweg.com> References: <201002222138.o1MLcoGs086212@freefall.freebsd.org> <4B83510B.1050805@FreeBSD.org> To: jhell X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.3 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24 autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on erg.verweg.com X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (erg.verweg.com [94.142.245.8]); Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:40:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: FreeBSD Filesystems , Doug Barton , freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: conf/144213: [rc.d] [patch] Disappearing zvols on reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:41:13 -0000 On 23 Feb 2010, at 14:00, jhell wrote: >=20 > On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:52, dougb@ wrote: >>>=20 >>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D144213 >>=20 >=20 > This is a good catch. I believe it would probably be best suited to = be 1). above mount -a or 2). at the very least above share -a. Other = then that non-zfs-root systems should not see a negative difference. Best would be 2). mounting is only for filesystems, not volumes and when = iscsi target mode is supported in freebsd (and zfs) you definitely want = your zvols to be available prior to sharing them. >=20 > Regards, >=20 > --=20 >=20 > jhell Regards, Ruben