Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 Nov 2002 23:00:31 -0800
From:      Kirk McKusick <mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com>
To:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Subject:   Re: Trashed Disk Labels 
Message-ID:  <200211300700.gAU70V59078064@beastie.mckusick.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 30 Nov 2002 17:43:53 %2B1100." <20021130174229.L3363-100000@gamplex.bde.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
	Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 17:43:53 +1100 (EST)
	From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
	X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org
	To: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@McKusick.COM>
	cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
	Subject: Re: Trashed Disk Labels
	In-Reply-To: <200211291938.gATJcS59077381@beastie.mckusick.com>
	X-ASK-Info: Whitelist match

	On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Kirk McKusick wrote:

	> I have had a report of a disk label getting trashed after booting
	> up to a kernel with the new UFS2 superblock format. I have just
	> checked in an update to ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c (version 1.198) that
	> explicitly checks to make sure that it will not trash your disk
	> label. I highly recommend that you update to this version, even if
	> you are only running with UFS1 filesystems.

	Labels should be write protected, but this seems to have been broken
	by GEOM.

	Bruce

Disk labels certainly used to be write protected. Not sure when that
stopped, but it certainly would have been useful in this recent context.

	Kirk McKusick

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200211300700.gAU70V59078064>