Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 5 Sep 2002 06:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Tim Vanderhoek <vanderh@ecf.utoronto.ca>
To:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ports/42300: [PATCH] Allow building when the -f makefile option is specified
Message-ID:  <200209051310.g85DA3dO017230@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/42300; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Tim Vanderhoek <vanderh@ecf.utoronto.ca>
To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, wvengen@stack.nl
Subject: Re: ports/42300: [PATCH] Allow building when the -f makefile option is specified
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 09:02:29 -0400

 [Various bits of silent eliding below...]
 On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 08:55:29AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
 > > >  MAINDIR=	${.CURDIR}/../sword
 > > > +MKFILE!=	/usr/bin/basename ${MAKEFILE}
 > > 
 > > Since ${MAINDIR} always refers to another port directory, I
 > > think that it is better in this case to simply do:
 > > 
 > > -PORTVERSION=	${MAKE} -V PORTVERSION -f ${MAINDIR}/${MAKEFILE}
 > > +PORTVERSION=	${MAKE} -V PORTVERSION -f ${MAINDIR}/Makefile
 > 
 > I thought further about this.  What if ${MAKEFILE} != Makefile?
 
 I would suggest that if /usr/ports/games/sword/Makefile is called
 something other than "Makefile", then sword is broken.
 
 
 -- 
 If I could think of a two-line witty aphorism for you to remember
 me by, this would definitely be it.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200209051310.g85DA3dO017230>