Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:24:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: dlt@mebtel.net Cc: FreeBSD current mailing list <current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: A pair of LORs Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0503141020001.2078@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <20050314110417.0705f268.antoine.brodin@laposte.net> References: <200503131851.j2DIpKhv001089@lorne.arm.org> <20050314110417.0705f268.antoine.brodin@laposte.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Antoine Brodin wrote: > Derek Tattersall <dlt@mebtel.net> wrote: > > This happened on a 6.0 current system supped and built this morning. > > I didn't see this recorded on Herr Zeeb's page, so perhaps somebody > > has some clues to offer? > [snip] > > lock order reversal > > 1st 0xc26f1300 so_rcv (so_rcv) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:1256 > > 2nd 0xc23a96c4 skc0 (network driver) @ /usr/src/sys/pci/if_sk.c:1112 > > For the second LOR, you can try the patch available at: > http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/patchset/if_sk.c-HEAD-20050303-01.diff if you are going to try that please use the [1-4]of4 patches from same directory and apply in ascending order. But I doubt it will help with this LOR (but testing would be good anyway;) An interesting thing to know would be if you have sk0 and sk1 (dual port) ? The first one is a more general problem (also seen with other NICs). I have been told there is work in progress... -- Greetings Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.53.0503141020001.2078>