From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 16:10:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D810106564A for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gizmo.2hip.net (gizmo.2hip.net [64.74.207.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BE18FC19 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.166.22] ([68.0.14.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by gizmo.2hip.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0TG9J2o062333 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:09:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) From: Robert Noland To: Mark Knight In-Reply-To: References: <+$PUWxC8yOfJFwC1@lap.knigma.org> <1232939280.1973.7.camel@wombat.2hip.net> <1233002689.88679.24.camel@squirrel.corp.cox.com> <1233197046.1779.11.camel@wombat.2hip.net> <1233234690.1779.20.camel@wombat.2hip.net> <1233238588.1779.48.camel@wombat.2hip.net> <1532XLOh3bgJFwKw@lap.knigma.org> <1233244386.1766.1.camel@wombat.2hip.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-3jmHNkuER3uKKUg1xdvd" Organization: FreeBSD Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:09:56 -0500 Message-Id: <1233245396.1766.13.camel@wombat.2hip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gizmo.2hip.net Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg 7.4 breaks mga with G450 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:10:03 -0000 --=-3jmHNkuER3uKKUg1xdvd Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 16:01 +0000, Mark Knight wrote: > In message , Mark Knight=20 > writes > >In message <1233244386.1766.1.camel@wombat.2hip.net>, Robert Noland=20 > > writes > >>Possibly, but I doubt it. The documentation that I have seems to > >>indicate that the g400/450 are the same... If memory serves, the 400 > >>wasn't dual head, but I might be wrong about that. > > > >It's dual head. From memory the G450 has a narrower bus but used DDR=20 > >and faster clocks speeds to try and compensate. >=20 > Sorry, I meant the G450 is dual head but as you say I think the G400=20 > wasn't. >=20 > Looking at the driver code it seems to be quite different for the G450. Ok, I'll try and have a look at the detection code... It's possible that this is somehow related to the switch to libpciaccess. robert. =20 > Cheers, --=-3jmHNkuER3uKKUg1xdvd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkmB1NQACgkQM4TrQ4qfROOoPQCcDCcxrKmEXCjcQ3Tn7dzxrC6G cXEAn2UUq/+MII8rxLSGHa/tEiLR1BhS =JTG+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-3jmHNkuER3uKKUg1xdvd--