Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:31:13 -0800
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster/files portmaster.sh.in
Message-ID:  <479B6051.3010205@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080126075440.GA97125@tirith.brixandersen.dk>
References:  <200801240236.m0O2awrw054388@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080124181741.GA37539@tirith.brixandersen.dk> <4798F0E3.1030401@FreeBSD.org> <20080124202623.GA46809@tirith.brixandersen.dk> <47993265.2030603@FreeBSD.org> <20080125215714.GA78140@tirith.brixandersen.dk> <479A71F4.2060106@FreeBSD.org> <20080126075440.GA97125@tirith.brixandersen.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:

> Well, you wrote that the commit log contained information on why you
> did this... Since this must be considered pretty non-standard (as far
> as I can tell, no other ports have this requirement), I'm quite
> curious as to why this was needed.

I think we've reached a language barrier here, since all you've done is 
repeat your request for an explanation without actually telling me why 
this is so important to you that you've invested so much energy into 
poking me about something that cannot possibly affect you in any way.

So, if you can tell me what your actual concerns are, I can try to 
expand my explanation to address them.

Doug

-- 

     This .signature sanitized for your protection



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?479B6051.3010205>