From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 16:31:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6610316A478 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:31:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E76C313C4E7 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:31:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 28500 invoked by uid 399); 26 Jan 2008 16:31:15 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.4?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 26 Jan 2008 16:31:15 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <479B6051.3010205@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:31:13 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <200801240236.m0O2awrw054388@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080124181741.GA37539@tirith.brixandersen.dk> <4798F0E3.1030401@FreeBSD.org> <20080124202623.GA46809@tirith.brixandersen.dk> <47993265.2030603@FreeBSD.org> <20080125215714.GA78140@tirith.brixandersen.dk> <479A71F4.2060106@FreeBSD.org> <20080126075440.GA97125@tirith.brixandersen.dk> In-Reply-To: <20080126075440.GA97125@tirith.brixandersen.dk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster/files portmaster.sh.in X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:31:16 -0000 Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > Well, you wrote that the commit log contained information on why you > did this... Since this must be considered pretty non-standard (as far > as I can tell, no other ports have this requirement), I'm quite > curious as to why this was needed. I think we've reached a language barrier here, since all you've done is repeat your request for an explanation without actually telling me why this is so important to you that you've invested so much energy into poking me about something that cannot possibly affect you in any way. So, if you can tell me what your actual concerns are, I can try to expand my explanation to address them. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection