Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:52:17 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64-bit time_t snapshot? Message-ID: <20040222175217.GG91129@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040216214653.GB23832@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <20040216214653.GB23832@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 04:46:53PM -0500, Ken Smith wrote: > If this is worth doing, any thoughts on whether it would be best to > base it on 5.2.1-RELEASE (plus just the time_t change) or would it > be better to try and catch a -current that seems stable? The release Definately a -current. So much has changed since RELENG_5_2 was first branched, that 5.2.1-RELEASE is too much of a downgrade. Especially with the latest threading changes.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040222175217.GG91129>