From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 22 10:04:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC3E16A4CF for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 10:04:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6976643D1D for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 10:04:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1MHqIOJ091967; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:52:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i1MHqHaS091966; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:52:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:52:17 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Ken Smith Message-ID: <20040222175217.GG91129@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20040216214653.GB23832@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040216214653.GB23832@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64-bit time_t snapshot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 18:04:38 -0000 On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 04:46:53PM -0500, Ken Smith wrote: > If this is worth doing, any thoughts on whether it would be best to > base it on 5.2.1-RELEASE (plus just the time_t change) or would it > be better to try and catch a -current that seems stable? The release Definately a -current. So much has changed since RELENG_5_2 was first branched, that 5.2.1-RELEASE is too much of a downgrade. Especially with the latest threading changes.