From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 24 01:34:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4487016A4CE; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 01:34:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (mailout.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A6D43FE0; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 01:34:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from barner@in.tum.de) Received: from zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (localhost.glhnet.mhn.de. [127.0.0.1]) by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAO9Yolc073435; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:34:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from simon@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de) Received: (from simon@localhost) by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id hAO9Yn8Y073434; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:34:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from simon) From: Simon Barner To: Adam Weinberger Message-ID: <20031124093449.GF15682@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <20031123095011.3b83370a.pnmurphy@cogeco.ca> <20031123201932.338db14f.pnmurphy@cogeco.ca> <20031124013145.GM40706@toxic.magnesium.net> <200311240533.39481.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <20031124052101.GO40706@toxic.magnesium.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="W5WqUoFLvi1M7tJE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031124052101.GO40706@toxic.magnesium.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.tu-muenchen.de cc: Paul Murphy cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: multimedia/beep-media-player doesn't compile X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 09:34:54 -0000 X-Original-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:34:49 +0100 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 09:34:54 -0000 --W5WqUoFLvi1M7tJE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > You're correct; it DOES build properly when I don't explicitly define > CPUTYPE. However, the fact remains that patching the places where > variables are defined in the middle of a function is preferable to > nullifying -march settings. With the patches from my PR it does build with CFLAGS="-O -march=k6 -mcpu=k6" (which what I use by default here). Simon --W5WqUoFLvi1M7tJE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/wdC5Ckn+/eutqCoRAu9GAKCTbhROJUvbIub/rMbf4M3oqL+kEACg69OC wImUyGzJ7nnXdAjtSSg2zfs= =l61c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --W5WqUoFLvi1M7tJE-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 27 05:34:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8453816A4CE; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 05:34:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from debussy.private.org (25.60.138.210.bn.2iij.net [210.138.60.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8861243FF2; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 05:34:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by debussy.private.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hARDYYIc002749; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:34:34 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Message-Id: <20031127.223434.846935079.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> To: dev@porting.openoffice.org, Pavel@Janik.cz From: Nakata Maho In-Reply-To: References: <3FC30806.8000502@mailru.com> <20031125.213349.596611807.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on XEmacs 21.4.14 (Reasonable Discussion) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: jaroshenko@mailru.com cc: openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [porting-dev] Towards OpenOffice.org ports for FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:34:25 -0000 X-Original-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:34:34 +0900 (JST) X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:34:25 -0000 Hi, Pavel > > so I can say OOo 1.1 ports are almost ready for 5.2-RELEASE. > > how did you solved http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=22253 > > Do you still mkdir soffice.cfg in the ports? Yes we do. this is serious problem, which prohibits to do QA. I recieved some mails about `I want to use OOo just *now*, there are no packages for our langs, so I had tried by myself from ports, but in vain, how can I fix it?' well, there are serious demands for them. 5.2-RELEASE is approaching, ports, src are now frozen, so just what I want to say is: `it works for me, and I'm 99% sure that this port will work for 5.2-RELEASE, so if you want working package for 5-series, please do cvsup ports tree, and upgrade userland kernel or wait for 5.2-RELEASE, it is for you'. --maho From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 27 13:35:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49CC16A4CE for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:35:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from netgecko.info (netgecko.info [217.160.92.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60D443FA3 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:35:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from alex.kiesel@document-root.de) Received: from [192.168.2.110] (dsl-213-023-059-125.arcor-ip.net [213.23.59.125]) by netgecko.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B5D88221; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:36:47 +0100 (CET) From: Alex Kiesel To: john_oshea@wordbank.com In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1069968897.599.3.camel@boost.home.ahk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems building expat port [long-ish] [re-send] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 21:35:03 -0000 X-Original-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:34:57 +0100 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 21:35:03 -0000 On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 12:02, john_oshea@wordbank.com wrote: > >===> Configuring for expat-1.95.6_1 > >checking build system type... Invalid configuration > >`FreeBSD-portbld-freebsd4.8': machine `FreeBSD-portbld' not > >recognized I don't know what caused that, but it should read i386-portbld-freebsd4.8 Greets, - Alex From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 5 09:34:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A59E216A4CE for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 09:34:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A68E643FD7 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 09:34:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adamw@magnesium.net) Received: (qmail 38515 invoked by uid 1252); 5 Dec 2003 17:34:52 -0000 From: Adam Weinberger To: Adam Zalcman Message-ID: <20031205173452.GC27144@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <20031205170448.GA5771@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Editor: Vim 6.2 http://www.vim.org X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5 http://www.mutt.org X-URL: http://www.vectors.cx X-ASL: 6/m/behind you User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: katakana-matrix screen saver X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 17:34:53 -0000 X-Original-Date: 5 Dec 2003 12:34:52 -0500 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 17:34:53 -0000 >> (12.05.2003 @ 1230 PST): Adam Zalcman said, in 0.7K: << > > I think there are already several Matrix-like screensavers > > in the ports collection though. > I've seen one text mode matrix screen saver. Providing that this is all > it still makes sense to add the one I mean since it's a little bit more > sophisticated. Anyway, I know a couple of people who like it ;-) >> end of "Re: katakana-matrix screen saver" from Adam Zalcman << There's that one, and xscreensaver[-gnome] comes with 2 matrix screensavers; one is xlib, and one is opengl. And I have this vague recollection that KDE comes with one, though I could be mistaken. However, I am of the opinion that there can never be too many eye candy screensavers. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger vectors.cx >> adam@vectors.cx >> http://www.vectors.cx magnesium.net << adamw@magnesium.net << http://www.magnesium.net/~adamw FreeBSD >> adamw@FreeBSD.org >> http://people.freebsd.org/~adamw #vim:set ts=8: 8-char tabs prevent tooth decay. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 10:33:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D37316A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 10:33:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from wind.mindcry.org (nat-gr.wmis.net [216.109.194.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC02A43D13 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 10:33:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david@wind.mindcry.org) Received: by wind.mindcry.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2B87440F1; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:33:21 -0500 (EST) From: David Hill To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031209183321.GA40324@phobia.ms> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Subject: Cant find patch? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 18:33:19 -0000 X-Original-Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:33:21 -0500 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 18:33:19 -0000 What does this mean? ns2# make ===> Extracting for rwhois-1.5.7.3_1 >> Checksum OK for rwhoisd-1.5.7.3.tar.gz. ===> Patching for rwhois-1.5.7.3_1 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for rwhois-1.5.7.3_1 I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere. ===> Configuring for rwhois-1.5.7.3_1 .... From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 11:34:04 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C03416A4CE; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:34:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A36743D37; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:33:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rdu74-159-108.nc.rr.com [24.74.159.108])hB9JXOxs011156; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 14:33:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.2.1.4] (vpn-client-4.marcuscom.com [10.2.1.4]) hB9JWFu5070370; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 14:32:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Palle Girgensohn In-Reply-To: <3310000.1070997864@rambutan.pingpong.net> References: <20031128125728.GA82876@xor.obsecurity.org> <20031208040326.GU27144@toxic.magnesium.net> <20031208170715.GF52981@hal9000.halplant.com> <1740000.1070962608@rambutan.pingpong.net> <1070988102.24654.1.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <3310000.1070997864@rambutan.pingpong.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ynWNGuLVBY3VbbhfC1DG" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1070998404.736.12.camel@gyros> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.60 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: Andrew J Caines cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Mike Heffner cc: Kris Kennaway cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users cc: Gary Jennejohn Subject: Re: firebird and xemacs locking up/crashing "in pairs"??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 19:34:04 -0000 X-Original-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 14:33:24 -0500 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 19:34:04 -0000 --=-ynWNGuLVBY3VbbhfC1DG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 14:24, Palle Girgensohn wrote: > --On tisdag, december 09, 2003 11.41.42 -0500 Joe Marcus Clarke=20 > wrote: >=20 > > On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 04:36, Palle Girgensohn wrote: > >> Indeed, my main suspect is gtk2, probably in combination with mozilla. > > > > Okay, if that's your probable cause, how does it explain that I've been > > using Mozilla/Galeon/Firebird with gtk+-2 since the option existed, and > > I have never experienced a lockup? >=20 > I can't, sorry. It was just a gut feeling... :) >=20 > Which window manager do you run? Perhaps it is a combination thing,=20 > something that only show up when running certain window managers? Noone=20 > here has mentioned problems when running GNOME, for example. Can we get i= t=20 > to fail in GNOME? Apparently not. I use metacity under the GNOME desktop. I would focus more on WM interaction with gtk+-2. But if emacs is still locking up, I would be more focused on the WM itself (note, I don't use emacs, so I don't know if it locks up under GNOME). Joe >=20 > /Palle >=20 > > > > Joe > > > >> > >> /Palle > >> > >> --On m=E5ndag, december 08, 2003 12.07.15 -0500 Andrew J Caines > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Same symptoms with firebird/mozilla-devel-gtk2 and blackbox. I haven= 't > >> > seen it happen in a while so can't say for sure it's still an issue > >> > with the latest versions. > >> > > >> > Since text entry boxes and such are widgety in nature, perhaps the > >> > problem is between Mozilla and GTK2? > >> > > >> > I usually paste text into a box, then the textboxes take keyboard > >> > input. > >> > > >> > Current versions: > >> > > >> > mozilla-firebird-0.7_1 > >> > mozilla-gtk2-1.6.a > >> > mozilla-headers-1.6.a,1 > >> > gtk-2.2.4_1 > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -Andrew- > >> > -- > >> > ___________________________________________________________________= __ > >> > __ > >> >| -Andrew J. Caines- Unix Systems Engineer A.J.Caines@halplant.co= m > >> >| | "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little > >> >| temporary | safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin > >> >| Franklin, 1759 | > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" > > -- > > PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-ynWNGuLVBY3VbbhfC1DG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/1iOEb2iPiv4Uz4cRArB7AKCs5DseJa2U71BI4GYNIxvYVXSp6gCgsMSP vOB3dXpzjgXVTkSI2eno6tk= =9hq5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ynWNGuLVBY3VbbhfC1DG-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 16:34:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C77C16A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 16:34:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (mailout.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300E343D1D for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 16:34:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from barner@in.tum.de) Received: from zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (localhost.glhnet.mhn.de. [127.0.0.1]) by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBA0RDu2091130; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 01:27:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from simon@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de) Received: (from simon@localhost) by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id hBA0RDit091129; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 01:27:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from simon) From: Simon Barner To: Dan Eischen Message-ID: <20031210002712.GA2145@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <20031209061635.GA55832@hal9000.halplant.com> <3FD65864.9060505@vigrid.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FD65864.9060505@vigrid.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.tu-muenchen.de cc: Andrew J Caines cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NEdit and OpenMotif 2.2 - crashes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:34:55 -0000 X-Original-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 01:27:12 +0100 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:34:55 -0000 --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Dan, > I have had 5.3 crash a few times -- usually when having multiple > files open and trying to close one of them. I do not use text > highlighting or some of the more possibly complicated features > of nedit, so my experience may not be the norm. I am using NEdit for a long time now, and it crashed only once -- this was when I wrote you a private message. I must say that I was really shocked because of that crash, because I use NEdit for pretty much everything (admittedly, I start using vim for more and more tasks, but lazy as I am I still stick with my old tools ;-) As you say futher down in your email, people "get really pissed when their editors crash and they lose work". That's why I started some expermients with 5.4RC2. First, I build it with lesstif as suggested by the NEdit people. I used the most recent version that was available at that time (probably 0.93.94 or 0.93.91), and I must say that that did not convince me at all: I had focus problems with the search dialogue, lesstif complained about deprecated library functions when I launched NEdit, the widgets looked ugly^W unfamiliar, ... > But, version 5.4 is about to be announced and the nedit developers > have added code that explicitly checks for openmotif 2.2.1 and > abort the build if it is found. They are very adamant that > you should not use openmotif 2.2. nedit-5.4 may well tickle > more bugs with openmotif. I've posted this in the last message, > but it bears reiterating: I am using NEdit 5.4RC that has been build against a OpenMotif 2.2.2, and I did not have a single problem since then. > http://www.motifdeveloper.com/tips/tip22.html >=20 > It does not seem suitable for a stable release. I'd have no > problem with having an openmotif-devel that was used this > version, but I think the openmotif port should go back to > the last stable release. Regarding my experiences with lesstif I fully agree with that. I don't think that the NEdit developers are making up the problems with OpenMotif 2.2.2, and I am really not keen on discovering them. Cheers, Simon --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/1mhgCkn+/eutqCoRAi/zAJsFUo4e2k9ZSflrd4Zh85WdkmjWWACgqKwZ +3tCE1q+O2V1gXfPZfAsRIg= =r9Db -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 00:35:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC6516A4CE; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:35:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from lakemtao05.cox.net (lakemtao05.cox.net [68.1.17.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACB8043D1F; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:35:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([68.103.32.11]) by lakemtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20031210083505.YOU29834.lakemtao05.cox.net@mezz.mezzweb.com>; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 03:35:05 -0500 To: Kirill Ponomarew References: <200312100828.hBA8SP1g012519@ss402.hinet.hr> <20031210083100.GE26410@voodoo.oberon.net> Message-ID: From: Jeremy Messenger Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20031210083100.GE26410@voodoo.oberon.net> User-Agent: Opera7.23/Linux M2 build 518 cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Dean Benazic Subject: Re: freebsd.org proxy error X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:35:09 -0000 X-Original-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 02:34:05 -0600 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:35:09 -0000 On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:31:00 +0100, Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 09:28:25AM +0200, Dean Benazic wrote: >> i try to search the ports collection: >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=intermezzo&stype=all >> >> >> Proxy Error >> The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server. >> The proxy server could not handle the request GET /cgi/ports.cgi. >> >> Reason: Could not connect to remote machine: Connection refused > > Did you already ask about it your admin or ISP ? Actually, it's down for me too when I tried to visit CVSweb of ports tree. It should be back up sometime soon. Cheers, Mezz > -Kirill -- bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 05:34:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F47516A4CE for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 05:34:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AAAC43D1F for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 05:34:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@rtp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org (9ball.rtp.FreeBSD.Org [172.21.1.6]) hBCDYoLO062336 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 08:34:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris@9ball.rtp.freebsd.org) Received: (from kris@localhost) by 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hBCDYoef022456 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 08:34:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris) From: Kris Kennaway Message-Id: <200312121334.hBCDYoef022456@9ball.rtp.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:34:52 -0000 X-Original-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 08:34:50 -0500 (EST) X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:34:52 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: xpbiff-1.27_1 Most recent CVS update was: U INDEX U INDEX-5 ? 1 ? cvs.log ? index.errs ? index.out ? log ? perl.core ? devel/glade2/make.core ? devel/gnomedebug/make.core ? dns/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? dns/powerdns/Makefile.inc ? graphics/gphoto2/make.core ? graphics/pstoedit/make.core ? misc/flyway/make.core ? net/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? net/bmon/make.core ? net/powerdns/Makefile.inc ? print/p5-Net-Printer/sh.core ? print/pips880/sh.core ? x11-fm/vide/sh.core From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 18 00:35:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE61A16A4CE for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 00:35:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from alcanet.com.au (mailout2.alcanet.com.au [208.178.117.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF9143D1F for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 00:35:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au) Received: from sydsmtp02.alcatel.com.au (IDENT:root@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])hBGLWGPF022488 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 08:32:16 +1100 Received: from gsmx07.alcatel.com.au ([139.188.20.247]) by sydsmtp02.alcatel.com.au (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.12) with ESMTP id 2003121708321520:277208 ; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 08:32:15 +1100 Received: from gsmx07.alcatel.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gsmx07.alcatel.com.au (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBGLWF7d041935 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 08:32:15 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au) Received: (from jeremyp@localhost) by gsmx07.alcatel.com.au (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hBGLWEtD041934 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 08:32:14 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au) From: Peter Jeremy To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031216213214.GM88618@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on SYDSMTP02/AlcatelAustralia(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 17/12/2003 08:32:15,|February 13, 2003) at 17/12/2003 08:32:16, Serialize complete at 17/12/2003 08:32:16 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Problem building OpenOffice.org 1.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 08:35:03 -0000 X-Original-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 08:32:14 +1100 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 08:35:03 -0000 I have a system running FreeBSD 4.9p1 and the OOo port dies in the extract step: ===> Extracting for openoffice-1.1.0_1 >> Checksum OK for openoffice1.1/OOo_1.1.0_source.tar.bz2. >> Checksum OK for openoffice1.1/gpc231.tar.Z. >> Checksum OK for openoffice1.1/patch-openoffice-mozilla101-2002-10-14. >> Checksum OK for openoffice1.1/mozilla-vendor-1.0.2a.tgz. make: don't know how to make extract-mozilla. Stop *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1. I first noticed this a few days ago and updating my ports tree hasn't helped. Another system running a two-week old version of 4-STABLE correctly passes "make extract". Both systems now have a ports tree from a CVS repository about 12 hours old. Removing /etc/make.conf and just using "make extract DISTDIR=/usr/ports_distfiles" doesn't help. Does anyone have any ideas? Please copy me in any replies. -- Peter Jeremy From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 29 08:34:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DE716A4CF; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 08:34:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.eos.ocn.ne.jp (eos.ocn.ne.jp [211.6.83.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD0743D1F; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 08:34:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from delta.allbsd.org (p45245-adsao12honb4-acca.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp [219.114.52.245]) by smtp.eos.ocn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49967A7; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 01:34:47 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (alph.allbsd.org [192.168.0.10]) by delta.allbsd.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBTGYFAB061355; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 01:34:16 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <20031230.013349.35008002.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> To: kwc@TheWorld.com From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: <200312291610.LAA13349885@shell.TheWorld.com> References: <200312291610.LAA13349885@shell.TheWorld.com> X-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Tue_Dec_30_01:33:49_2003_324)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: sergei@FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: kuriyama@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: xmlcatmgr & docproj broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 16:34:50 -0000 X-Original-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 01:33:49 +0900 (JST) X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 16:34:50 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Dec_30_01:33:49_2003_324)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Kenneth W Cochran wrote in <200312291610.LAA13349885@shell.TheWorld.com>: kwc> ===> Checking if textproc/dsssl-docbook-modular already installed kwc> /usr/local/bin/xmlcatmgr -sc /usr/local/share/sgml/catalog.ports add CATALOG docbook/dsssl/modular/catalog kwc> xmlcatmgr: entry already exists kwc> *** Error code 1 kwc> kwc> Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/dsssl-docbook-modular. kwc> ---------------------------------------- kwc> kwc> Currently I'm unable to install this port, therefore also unable kwc> to install textproc/docproj. kwc> Any idea(s) what's wrong here? How to fix/workaround? kwc> Should I file a pr? I think the cause is that while "add CATALOG" in the post-install target uses ${RELDIR}/catalog, in pkg-plist ${PREFIX}/share/sgml/${RELDIR}(%%DTDDIR%%) is used. It is probably a bug in the port skeleton, but removing a line CATALOG "docbook/dsssl/modular/catalog" in /usr/local/share/sgml/catalog.ports manually, you can avoid such a problem. Kuriyama-san, could you please fix %%DTDDIR%%? The pathnames should be consistent. -- | Hiroki SATO ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Dec_30_01:33:49_2003_324)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/8FdtTyzT2CeTzy0RAvhLAJ9DQb0xez8b225h8HCTXE3sHrGeKwCfZtwp ghFAT6d2ctq/ClyBW2oYZac= =FCIY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Dec_30_01:33:49_2003_324)---- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 19:35:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77D1A16A4CE for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:35:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-119-53-122.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBBFC43D4C for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:35:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3276D66C77; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:35:05 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20040107033504.GA25788@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: the latest statistics on the number of ports PRs X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 03:35:09 -0000 X-Original-Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:35:05 -0800 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 03:35:09 -0000 --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 07:59:17PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > Some time back, we got to the point where there were less > ports PRs than kern PRs. Now, we have just crossed the point > (758) where there are less ports PRs than *bin* PRs. I want > to specifically thank krion, pav, sergei, marcus, edwin, and > a cast of many others for their recent work in chopping down > the backlog. >=20 > Oh yeah, we're down to a half-dozen maintainer-updates, too. What's the next target? Kris --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/+35oWry0BWjoQKURAlXAAKCnUiHRntwybRLRzXnC3JkO1XASqQCbBJLl VMcp41PQDO1LFJhKqOTKEBk= =3qyO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 08:34:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665C616A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:34:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from sirius.firepipe.net (sirius.firepipe.net [69.13.116.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1962543D55 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:34:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from petef@sirius.firepipe.net) Received: from sirius.firepipe.net (localhost.firepipe.net [127.0.0.1]) by sirius.firepipe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B150E17DB9; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:34:50 -0600 (CST) From: Pete Fritchman To: Tillman Hodgson In-Reply-To: Message from Tillman Hodgson of "Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:48:32 CST." <20040112154832.GI491@seekingfire.com> Sender: petef@sirius.firepipe.net Message-Id: <20040112163450.B150E17DB9@sirius.firepipe.net> cc: boris@tagnet.ru cc: chris@e-easy.com.au cc: FreeBSD-Ports Subject: Re: UID conflict: Both database/firebird and net/quagga apeear to use UID 90 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:34:55 -0000 X-Original-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:34:50 -0600 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:34:55 -0000 * Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:48:32 CST - Tillman Hodgson: | This makes using devel/fpc (which has firebird as a dependency) on a box | running quagga rather interesting. | | What's the standard way to handle cases like this? I thought of filing a probabably | PR, but defining the problem seemed difficult: which port needs to | migrate? To what UID? How will the existing installations handle the | change? Well, someone has to change :-) I'd say whoever had the UID first gets to keep it. It's really up to the two maintainers (cc:'d). Whatever the result, the UID chosen should be documented here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/dads-uid.html If we keep all the UIDs documented there, we should'd have the problem of people adding a new port with a duplicate UID. I'm sure there are a ton of ports that add users with UIDs that are _not_ documented there; we should probably fix that as we come across them. --pete From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 16:08:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AEED16A4CE; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 16:08:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.eos.ocn.ne.jp (eos.ocn.ne.jp [211.6.83.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D5943D1D; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 16:07:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from delta.allbsd.org (p58149-adsao12honb4-acca.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp [220.96.140.149]) by smtp.eos.ocn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92EFC60; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:05:44 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (alph.allbsd.org [192.168.0.10]) by delta.allbsd.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0R04fA2015466; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:04:42 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:04:06 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20040127.090406.126848850.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> To: jwimb@patmedia.net, kuriyama@FreeBSD.org From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: <40155A60.4060909@patmedia.net> References: <40155A60.4060909@patmedia.net> X-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-Mailer: Mew version 4.0.62 on Emacs 21.3.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Tue_Jan_27_09_04_06_2004_610)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: docbook-xml-4.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:08:03 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Jan_27_09_04_06_2004_610)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit James Ballantine wrote in <40155A60.4060909@patmedia.net>: jwimb> /usr/local/share/xml/docbook/4.2/$file; done jwimb> xmlcatmgr: entry already exists for jwimb> `/usr/local/share/xml/docbook/4.2/docbook.cat' of type `CATALOG' jwimb> *** Error code 1 jwimb> jwimb> Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/docbook-xml. jwimb> jwimb> xmlcatmgr is the ports version 2.0a2 and this is a 4.9-STABLE system. Hmmm, it is strange. You can remove a line CATALOG "/usr/local/share/xml/docbook/4.2/docbook.cat" in /usr/local/share/sgml/catalog manually and reinstall docbook-xml as a workaround. I am not sure why the line remains---it should be removed when the port is deinstall, and the problem does not occur during a clean install. Anyway, I am looking into the cause. Sorry for the inconvenience. Kuriyama-san, could you please add "-" (ignore non-zero exit status) in the post-install target for the time being? -- | Hiroki SATO ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Jan_27_09_04_06_2004_610)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAFar2TyzT2CeTzy0RAi4eAKCuQwYUe6iRJp+jcBgjTfkbtwwltQCgmthi zieysg5wz7I4FZpXIggM2oc= =svQv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Jan_27_09_04_06_2004_610)---- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 16:16:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E3116A4CE; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 16:16:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (mailout.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2291D43D60; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 16:15:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from barner@in.tum.de) Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0376A9728; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 01:06:20 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 01:06:18 +0100 From: Simon Barner To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20040127000618.GE65527@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <20040125000805.GE27786@o503.hadiko.de> <20040126032518.GE47635@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20040126075053.GB3236@o503.hadiko.de> <20040126131522.GG47635@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20040126232226.GA48078@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="E7i4zwmWs5DOuDSH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040126232226.GA48078@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.tu-muenchen.de cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: "Thomas E. Zander" cc: multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0pre3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:16:51 -0000 --E7i4zwmWs5DOuDSH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Kris Kennaway wrote: > With the new version, I cannot seem to pause videos with the 'space' > key when running gmplayer. This was a bit 'picky' under the previous > port version: I would often have to press the key a few times to get > it to actually stay paused, but the new one doesn't want to stay > paused no matter how many times I do it. > My port is built with: >=20 > WITH_OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS=3D1 > WITHOUT_RUNTIME_CPUDETECTION=3D1 > WITH_GTK2=3D1 I used the same cpu option (+ tons of already installed and auto-detected gadgets), but I used the gtk1 gui, since I'm still on -stable, where the gtk2 gui does currently not compile. I just wanted to write that pausing videos works for me, but that's only true for the cli version of mplayer: Also with the gtk1 gui, neither 'space' nor 'p' work. Simon --E7i4zwmWs5DOuDSH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAFat6Ckn+/eutqCoRAhpAAJ9B6yw1c6Dr9X6trmkBGDcmGE4JfQCg38M/ S5zby7Sr4l8+bMdttYomc2A= =E9TK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --E7i4zwmWs5DOuDSH-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 16:22:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D90416A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 16:22:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.eos.ocn.ne.jp (eos.ocn.ne.jp [211.6.83.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC20A43D5F for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 16:20:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from delta.allbsd.org (p58149-adsao12honb4-acca.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp [220.96.140.149]) by smtp.eos.ocn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55318EA; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:18:22 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (alph.allbsd.org [192.168.0.10]) by delta.allbsd.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0R0GLA2015557; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:16:22 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:13:53 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20040127.091353.21844302.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> To: chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: <20040126.231820.28780868.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> References: <20040124215811.GB9930@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040126.231820.28780868.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> X-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-Mailer: Mew version 4.0.62 on Emacs 21.3.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Tue_Jan_27_09_13_53_2004_190)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Fix request for atlas-devel-3.6.0 on ia64, marked as broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:22:31 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Jan_27_09_13_53_2004_190)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Nakata Maho wrote in <20040126.231820.28780868.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp>: chat95> Kris reported that math/atlas-devel is broken for ia64 (thank you chat95> very much for kris, for your hard work). chat95> chat95> I'm not currently interested in ia64 arch, so help is needed chat95> from ia64 peoples. Did you really look into the build log on bento? The error has occurred at the first configuration stage because files/answer file does not work for ia64. It can easily be fixed without knowledge of ia64 arch, and seems buildable at least once the stage is fixed (I tried the attached patch on pluto2). Since I have no ia64 box, I do not know if it actually works, though. -- | Hiroki SATO Index: atlas-devel/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/math/atlas-devel/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -d -u -I\$FreeBSD:.*\$ -I\$NetBSD:.*\$ -I\$OpenBSD:.*\$ -I\$Id:.*\$ -I\$hrs:.*\$ -r1.8 Makefile --- atlas-devel/Makefile 26 Jan 2004 13:41:47 -0000 1.8 +++ atlas-devel/Makefile 26 Jan 2004 16:45:09 -0000 @@ -59,20 +59,27 @@ .endif .endif +ANSWER_i386?= ${PRINTF} "\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n" +ANSWER_ia64?= ${PRINTF} "\n\n\n2\n\n\n\n\n\nf77\n-O2 -static\n\n" + +.if !defined(ANSWER_${ARCH}) +ANSWER= ${ANSWER_i386} +.else +ANSWER= ${ANSWER_${ARCH}} +.endif + do-configure: - @(cd ${WRKSRC}; ${MAKE_ENV} ${MAKE} xconfig ; \ - ./xconfig -N 1 -c ${CC} -f ${FC} -a NON_THREADED < ${FILESDIR}/answer) - @(cd ${WRKSRC}; ${MAKE_ENV} ${MAKE} xconfig ; \ - ./xconfig -N 1 -c ${CC} -f ${FC} -a NON_THREADED_PIC \ + @(cd ${WRKSRC}; ${MAKE_ENV} ${MAKE} xconfig && \ + ${ANSWER} | ./xconfig -N 1 -c ${CC} -f ${FC} -a NON_THREADED && \ + ${ANSWER} | ./xconfig -N 1 -c ${CC} -f ${FC} -a NON_THREADED_PIC \ -F c '${PICFLAG} -DPIC' -F f '${PICFLAG} -DPIC' \ - -F m '${PICFLAG} -DPIC' -F x '${PICFLAG} -DPIC' < ${FILESDIR}/answer) - @(cd ${WRKSRC}; ${PATCH} < ${FILESDIR}/thread-patch) - @(cd ${WRKSRC}; ${MAKE_ENV} ${MAKE} xconfig ; \ - ./xconfig -c ${CC} -f ${FC} -a THREADED < ${FILESDIR}/answer) - @(cd ${WRKSRC}; ${MAKE_ENV} ${MAKE} xconfig ; \ - ./xconfig -c ${CC} -f ${FC} -a THREADED_PIC \ + -F m '${PICFLAG} -DPIC' -F x '${PICFLAG} -DPIC') + @(cd ${WRKSRC}; ${PATCH} < ${FILESDIR}/thread-patch && \ + ${MAKE_ENV} ${MAKE} xconfig && \ + ${ANSWER} | ./xconfig -c ${CC} -f ${FC} -a THREADED && \ + ${ANSWER} | ./xconfig -c ${CC} -f ${FC} -a THREADED_PIC \ -F c '${PICFLAG} -DPIC' -F f '${PICFLAG} -DPIC' \ - -F m '${PICFLAG} -DPIC' -F x '${PICFLAG} -DPIC' < ${FILESDIR}/answer) + -F m '${PICFLAG} -DPIC' -F x '${PICFLAG} -DPIC' ) ATLAS_LIBS1=libalapack libatlas libcblas libf77blas libtstatlas ATLAS_LIBS2=libptcblas libptf77blas ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Jan_27_09_13_53_2004_190)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAFa1CTyzT2CeTzy0RAsixAKChSbfJgpCV5KyEr/h3tzg9X4D5yACfWDdz EtRHh6I5x9dqebQvT76MnM0= =4AvN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Jan_27_09_13_53_2004_190)---- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 17:24:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047CC16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:24:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F2AD43D45 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:24:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from incmc@gmx.de) Received: (qmail 28387 invoked by uid 65534); 27 Jan 2004 01:24:00 -0000 Received: from VPNPOOL01-0384.UNI-MUENSTER.DE (EHLO incmc) (128.176.151.138) by mail.gmx.net (mp011) with SMTP; 27 Jan 2004 02:24:00 +0100 X-Authenticated: #15946415 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 02:23:59 +0100 From: Jochen Gensch X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53d) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1241612318.20040127022359@gmx.de> To: clement@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Bug in FreeBSD Port: inn-2.4.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jochen Gensch List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 01:24:47 -0000 Hi! I maybe found a bug in the installation process of inn 2.4.1. This has been discussed in news.software.nntp, too. Russ Albery means, that this a special problem to freebsd and he doesn't understand what's going on here... You can have a look at the bug report: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=61974 Tanks in advance, Jochen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 17:52:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C0E16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:52:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from web60306.mail.yahoo.com (web60306.mail.yahoo.com [216.109.118.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B56BE43D94 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:52:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dmontal2@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040127015209.88359.qmail@web60306.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.27.70.21] by web60306.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:52:09 PST Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:52:09 -0800 (PST) From: Diego Montalvo To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: compress a freebsd .tbz port. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 01:52:11 -0000 hello, i downloaded "abc.tbz" extracted and changed the version of apache in the +CONTENTS of a package. I know have all the package files in a directory. How do I go about compressing the package files back to a useable "abc.tbz" format. thanks, diego __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 18:10:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E29516A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 18:10:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from cultdeadsheep.org (charon.cultdeadsheep.org [80.65.226.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A8343D94 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 18:08:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from clement@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 33781 invoked by uid 85); 27 Jan 2004 03:07:04 +0100 Received: from clement@FreeBSD.org by goofy.cultdeadsheep.org by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.20rc2 (spamassassin: 2.61. Clear:RC:1:. Processed in 0.081673 secs); 27 Jan 2004 02:07:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lucifer.cultdeadsheep.org) (192.168.0.2) by goofy.cultdeadsheep.org with SMTP; 27 Jan 2004 03:07:03 +0100 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 03:07:50 +0100 From: Clement Laforet To: Jochen Gensch Message-Id: <20040127030750.2116da4b.clement@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1241612318.20040127022359@gmx.de> References: <1241612318.20040127022359@gmx.de> Organization: FreeBSD Project X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__27_Jan_2004_03_07_50_+0100_lzPeI1ldnZoyr9wB" cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Bug in FreeBSD Port: inn-2.4.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 02:10:14 -0000 --Signature=_Tue__27_Jan_2004_03_07_50_+0100_lzPeI1ldnZoyr9wB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 02:23:59 +0100 Jochen Gensch wrote: Hi ! > I maybe found a bug in the installation process of inn 2.4.1. No it isn't. The only bug I know is when you use FreeBSD-stable + inn + perl 5.8. It fails during pkg-install script. This feature exists *only* in FreeBSD ports. It's here to prevent config files removal. > This has been discussed in news.software.nntp, too. Russ Albery means, > that this a special problem to freebsd and he doesn't understand > what's going on here... People who don't want to use predefined FreeBSD ports path, don't use FreeBSD ports. Before complaining that it's an idiotic way of thinking (as we discussed privately), you should have understood how my port works. If you only change a line in the Makefile, it will "work" but you gonna lose all your local changes. Changing sysconfdir implies: - pkg-install changes - plist changes I always try my best to my ports flexible, adding a knob to allows config files installation in ${PREFIX}/etc/inn is *very* easy, but it won't NEVER be the default behavior. Now you just have to wait, until I can get some free time to deal with this. clem --Signature=_Tue__27_Jan_2004_03_07_50_+0100_lzPeI1ldnZoyr9wB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAFcf2sRhfjwcjuh0RArkFAKCRMcMdIuzT2LL7MoanhIraN2KyLQCg1laV w/da1DRluuZ0U521Uo1SaPo= =8VAH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__27_Jan_2004_03_07_50_+0100_lzPeI1ldnZoyr9wB-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 23:42:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E42C16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 23:42:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from pd4mo2so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9205143D1F for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 23:42:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peepstein@canada.com) Received: from pd4mr3so.prod.shaw.ca (pd4mr3so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.214]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HS500DM00X0RU@l-daemon> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:31:48 -0700 (MST) Received: from pn2ml5so.prod.shaw.ca (pn2ml5so-qfe0.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.121.149]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HS500ASP0X0SZ@l-daemon> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:31:48 -0700 (MST) Received: from interface.larch.local (h24-80-23-243.vc.shawcable.net [24.80.23.243]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HS50050U0WVHS@l-daemon> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:31:48 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 23:31:56 -0800 From: Edward Epstein To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-id: <200401262331.56417.peepstein@canada.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 cc: magick-developers@imagemagick.org Subject: ImageMagick Checksum Mismatch. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: peepstein@canada.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 07:42:06 -0000 I'm trying to upgrade graphics/ImageMagick, but it seems that there is a checksum mismatch with the ImageMagick-5.5.7-15.tar.bz2 file. Can someone please let me know if there is a legitimate reason for this? Here is what I assume to be the pertinent information: Timestamp from ImageMagick Makefile: $FreeBSD: ports/graphics/ImageMagick/Makefile,v 1.176 2004/01/21 06:57:29 nork Exp $ md5 checksum from ImageMagick distinfo file: MD5 (ImageMagick-5.5.7-15.tar.bz2) = 80144cc67bb9888b26f9704362269487 md5 checksum from ImageMagick source file downloaded from ftp.imagemagick.org/pub/ImageMagick: MD5 (ImageMagick-5.5.7-15.tar.bz2) = 6780f81dee32f1e8d2f277b6fe621955 I've re-downloaded the file multiple times from the site, just in case there was a problem with the download. Also, I've pulled the same file from some mirrors and noticed that the checksums from the mirrors match the checksum from the official imagemagick.org ftp site, not the checksum in the distinfo file (which makes sense if the mirrors pull the file automagically from the main site). Also, to magick-developers@, I am not subscribed so please make sure to CC me if you reply to this message. Regards, Ed -- "There are people who cheat on their spouse but not at cards, and vice versa, and both and neither. Reputation is not necessarily portable from one situation to another, and it's not easily expressed." --Clay Shirkey. (http://www.shirky.com/writings/group_enemy.html) "It has been said that man is a rational animal. All my life I have been searching for evidence which could support this." --Bertrand Russell. "The American empire is ideological, not territorial. We are the most ideological people in the world, and we are so united in our view that we don't understand there can be other views." --Lt. Gen. William Odom, ret. (Former Director of NSA). From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 23:59:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041D516A4CE; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 23:59:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.64.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8186443D64; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 23:58:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from riggs@o503.hadiko.de) Received: from o503.hadiko.de (hadio503.hadiko.uni-karlsruhe.de [172.20.45.138]) by mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1AlO7S-0001l4-00; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:58:46 +0100 Received: from o503.hadiko.de (RIXT@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by o503.hadiko.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0R7wj8v010658; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:58:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from riggs@o503.hadiko.de) Received: (from riggs@localhost) by o503.hadiko.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0R7wjUl010657; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:58:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from riggs) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:58:45 +0100 From: "Thomas E. Zander" To: multimedia@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040127075845.GB10363@o503.hadiko.de> References: <20040125000805.GE27786@o503.hadiko.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040125000805.GE27786@o503.hadiko.de> Organization: RiggiServ - Ihr Partner =?iso-8859-15?Q?f?= =?iso-8859-15?Q?=FCr?= alles Delikate X-PGP-KeyID: 0xC85996CD X-PGP-URI: http://blackhole.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC85996CD X-PGP-Fingerprint: 4F59 75B4 4CE3 3B00 BC61 5400 8DD4 8929 C859 96CD X-Mailer: Riggisoft Ausguck Eggsbress (Build 1075188912) X-Operating-System: Riggiland BSD 5.2-CURRENT (To serve and protect.) cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Thank you all! [was: Please test: mplayer 1.0pre3] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 07:59:07 -0000 --qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good morning, well, as the subject already said, I thank you all for feedback. At the moment I've got the impression that an update to 1.0pre3 causes more regression in usability and comfort than keeping 0.92 for a while. Especially o The new libavcodec hasn't been merged in yet, so we'd need further huge aggressive patching to enable playing some critical files (thanks Simon). o The gtk2 patch only works on -current and it's future in further releases is not certain. Also there are some regressions with the gui in general, e.g. the "pause-key". prevent me from feeling good about an update of the ports tree in this case. So I'll do the following: We wait at least for 1.0pre4 before updating the official ports tree with the new version, further I keep on collecting patches and ideas for the new version and keep updating this port on my homepage, so that whoever wants to use 1.0pre instead of 0.92 can do this by just downloading it until it finds its way into the ports tree. I think that's the best solution at the moment. Objections? Regards, Riggs --=20 - "[...] I talked to the computer at great length and -- explained my view of the Universe to it" said Marvin. --- And what happened?" pressed Ford. ---- "It committed suicide." said Marvin. --qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFAFho1jdSJKchZls0RAscMAJwN1LS2CvFL45EazaFlLPZxzWz+/ACeMhjd FpkycW4s7GsSyoDwbH37hm8= =V1NF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 00:07:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F0016A4CE; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:07:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from ftp.ccrle.nec.de (ftp.netlab.nec.de [195.37.70.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8C443D62; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:07:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de) Received: from netlab.nec.de (tokyo.netlab.nec.de [195.37.70.2]) by ftp.ccrle.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13058F5A9; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:12:05 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <40161C38.5050101@netlab.nec.de> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:07:20 +0100 From: Lars Eggert Organization: NEC Network Laboratories User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5a (Macintosh/20040126) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Thomas E. Zander" References: <20040125000805.GE27786@o503.hadiko.de> <20040127075845.GB10363@o503.hadiko.de> In-Reply-To: <20040127075845.GB10363@o503.hadiko.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms030507050600090809020705" cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thank you all! [was: Please test: mplayer 1.0pre3] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:07:54 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms030507050600090809020705 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thomas E. Zander wrote: > > At the moment I've got the impression that an update to 1.0pre3 causes > more regression in usability and comfort than keeping 0.92 for a while. > Especially > o The new libavcodec hasn't been merged in yet, so we'd need further > huge aggressive patching to enable playing some critical files > (thanks Simon). > o The gtk2 patch only works on -current and it's future in further > releases is not certain. Also there are some regressions with the > gui in general, e.g. the "pause-key". > prevent me from feeling good about an update of the ports tree in this > case. Don't forget the TV functionality... Lars -- Lars Eggert NEC Network Laboratories --------------ms030507050600090809020705 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIJ/zCC Az8wggKooAMCAQICAQ0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwgdExCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQI EwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEaMBgGA1UEChMRVGhhd3RlIENv bnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gU2VydmljZXMgRGl2aXNpb24xJDAi BgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTErMCkGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYccGVy c29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTAeFw0wMzA3MTcwMDAwMDBaFw0xMzA3MTYyMzU5 NTlaMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAoUHR5KSBM dGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQTCBnzAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAxKY8VXNV+065yplaHmjAdQRwnd/p/6Me7L3N9Vvy Gna9fww6YfK/Uc4B1OVQCjDXAmNaLIkVcI7dyfArhVqqP3FWy688Cwfn8R+RNiQqE88r1fOC dz0Dviv+uxg+B79AgAJk16emu59l0cUqVIUPSAR/p7bRPGEEQB5kGXJgt/sCAwEAAaOBlDCB kTASBgNVHRMBAf8ECDAGAQH/AgEAMEMGA1UdHwQ8MDowOKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwudGhh d3RlLmNvbS9UaGF3dGVQZXJzb25hbEZyZWVtYWlsQ0EuY3JsMAsGA1UdDwQEAwIBBjApBgNV HREEIjAgpB4wHDEaMBgGA1UEAxMRUHJpdmF0ZUxhYmVsMi0xMzgwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAD gYEASIzRUIPqCy7MDaNmrGcPf6+svsIXoUOWlJ1/TCG4+DYfqi2fNi/A9BxQIJNwPP2t4WFi w9k6GX6EsZkbAMUaC4J0niVQlGLH2ydxVyWN3amcOY6MIE9lX5Xa9/eH1sYITq726jTlEBpb NU1341YheILcIRk13iSx0x1G/11fZU8wggNaMIICw6ADAgECAgMLU6IwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEE BQAwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0 ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTAz MTIxNTEyMzEyOFoXDTA0MTIxNDEyMzEyOFowgYQxDzANBgNVBAQTBkVnZ2VydDENMAsGA1UE KhMETGFyczEUMBIGA1UEAxMLTGFycyBFZ2dlcnQxKDAmBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWGWxhcnMuZWdn ZXJ0QG5ldGxhYi5uZWMuZGUxIjAgBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWE2xhcnMuZWdnZXJ0QGdteC5uZXQw ggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQDWps58Zq8Buu2DKDl9crbvzSo6zWsZ TkQLr5zOTqUMs/eU7Mcohv64O4IxWWYGLfYsjDRxUlmdHdJUbyTtUh2lH452DUDJByXidlLm RDgohG0AVwztedqy1+hE3VnCdpMhUGks+6ntrr3dKSxMgLM0AM1kPWsH9lWX6IOPdxOC30gM PiQ65zH9PR70befQLgFPKcAv0wP8210l05n8ekwYAcq2cm3/j+nuDu0HEh5pgsnY7cVELeNJ ODvr4IiE1t3c2w4+0Nc/WJrqGCMl+gZ8c+7FtzjoyDeEsCjNFDeA2ymNd+10O6kjwvPHlzPr 3rW73RDRPAjMJ49HXlueiuoNAgMBAAGjdzB1MCoGBStlAQQBBCEwHwIBADAaMBgCAQQEE0wy dU15ZmZCTlViTkpKY2RaMnMwOQYDVR0RBDIwMIEZbGFycy5lZ2dlcnRAbmV0bGFiLm5lYy5k ZYETbGFycy5lZ2dlcnRAZ214Lm5ldDAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAA4GB AHgrv3SQFD4AS4lY4oKcI3iTHcclEHbYfg3UUb8zzCUsl+OJoz0nmebGmOL+tvNj5GvCrWnN H4LvVLh8ZBhFXms7eKJ1YiHgbKwTRK23P8Y5NDit5ico0ZjpFWeenUWj3ajEbN6n4K8dNp+C 0b2apnSrlFVWY6BucZFIYqQ1Lf91MIIDWjCCAsOgAwIBAgIDC1OiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUA MGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQu MSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQTAeFw0wMzEy MTUxMjMxMjhaFw0wNDEyMTQxMjMxMjhaMIGEMQ8wDQYDVQQEEwZFZ2dlcnQxDTALBgNVBCoT BExhcnMxFDASBgNVBAMTC0xhcnMgRWdnZXJ0MSgwJgYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhlsYXJzLmVnZ2Vy dEBuZXRsYWIubmVjLmRlMSIwIAYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhNsYXJzLmVnZ2VydEBnbXgubmV0MIIB IjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEA1qbOfGavAbrtgyg5fXK2780qOs1rGU5E C6+czk6lDLP3lOzHKIb+uDuCMVlmBi32LIw0cVJZnR3SVG8k7VIdpR+Odg1AyQcl4nZS5kQ4 KIRtAFcM7XnastfoRN1ZwnaTIVBpLPup7a693SksTICzNADNZD1rB/ZVl+iDj3cTgt9IDD4k Oucx/T0e9G3n0C4BTynAL9MD/NtdJdOZ/HpMGAHKtnJt/4/p7g7tBxIeaYLJ2O3FRC3jSTg7 6+CIhNbd3NsOPtDXP1ia6hgjJfoGfHPuxbc46Mg3hLAozRQ3gNspjXftdDupI8Lzx5cz6961 u90Q0TwIzCePR15bnorqDQIDAQABo3cwdTAqBgUrZQEEAQQhMB8CAQAwGjAYAgEEBBNMMnVN eWZmQk5VYk5KSmNkWjJzMDkGA1UdEQQyMDCBGWxhcnMuZWdnZXJ0QG5ldGxhYi5uZWMuZGWB E2xhcnMuZWdnZXJ0QGdteC5uZXQwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFAAOBgQB4 K790kBQ+AEuJWOKCnCN4kx3HJRB22H4N1FG/M8wlLJfjiaM9J5nmxpji/rbzY+Rrwq1pzR+C 71S4fGQYRV5rO3iidWIh4GysE0Sttz/GOTQ4reYnKNGY6RVnnp1Fo92oxGzep+CvHTafgtG9 mqZ0q5RVVmOgbnGRSGKkNS3/dTGCAzswggM3AgEBMGkwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNV BAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJz b25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAgMLU6IwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAacwGAYJKoZIhvcN AQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDQwMTI3MDgwNzIwWjAjBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQQxFgQUuGOGTtPH5VpO4npQYR87DfgPOjkwUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG 9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcN AwICASgweAYJKwYBBAGCNxAEMWswaTBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECAwtTojB6BgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzFroGkwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkEx JTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0 ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAgMLU6IwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEggEA nRBUuhEYmDJHY1OKLBtPcWcDUSXXekOwrezMOY+reCWkUp8M5TLteautaa/Gwv9Ja3b9zTBO nw6Injv4O237MqWBKlhM+bkSyfwQHOpZTLqAOhlU8YA8Jyf7ZKYWHmfDLbi+j3oLKtSr8BZ/ TDLKYSgFfHyx6q1QxUeK3BvVFaKVNAvwrSE6yfAeVmW7QkDWb8WaQobS1ejfzGAYyWs7muPK PhPNGg65nPr5HxHLTAbTNJvYtG44JdNiw/QbICwX2UoxigYXYOQzLh/CKdY7vZ+ST+50LBtm bSkGifitrCALRtxjzEGU3/A8+qULvmwvNfjXGkHYmbcg2RMbq17OigAAAAAAAA== --------------ms030507050600090809020705-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 00:33:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C79E16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:33:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from spam2.snu.ac.kr (spam2.snu.ac.kr [147.46.10.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EAF143D45 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:33:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nospam@users.sourceforge.net) Received: (snipe 14061 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2004 17:33:19 +0900(KST) Received: from nospam@users.sourceforge.net with SpamSniper2.76 (Processed in 0.040446 secs); Received: from unknown (HELO sis1.snu.ac.kr) (147.46.10.36) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Jan 2004 17:33:19 +0900(KST) X-RCPTTO: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org,stephen@math.missouri.edu, Received: from users.sourceforge.net ([147.46.44.183]) by sis1.snu.ac.kr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0R8UIHO125832; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:30:18 +0900 Message-ID: <40162252.3020304@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:33:22 +0900 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040119 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4012D1BA.9000902@math.missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <4012D1BA.9000902@math.missouri.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Problems with gcc33 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:33:25 -0000 Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > The gcc33 port makes fine, but when I do make install I get: > > /bin/mv -f /usr/local/man/man1/g7733.1 /usr/local/man/man1/g77-33.1 > mv: rename /usr/local/man/man1/g7733.1 to /usr/local/man/man1/g77-33.1: > No such file or directory > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports-current/lang/gcc33. Exactly same result here, when I do a "portupgrade". I have temporarily bypassed this problem by commenting out line 141 in the Makefile of the port. I may miss a man file, but at least I can upgrade :). Would be nice if someone knows how to fix this port. Rob. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 00:55:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B45416A4CE; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:55:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.64.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A47043D3F; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:55:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from riggs@o503.hadiko.de) Received: from o503.hadiko.de (hadio503.hadiko.uni-karlsruhe.de [172.20.45.138]) by mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1AlP0Q-0006TN-00; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:55:34 +0100 Received: from o503.hadiko.de (RIXT@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by o503.hadiko.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0R8tX8v011009; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:55:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from riggs@o503.hadiko.de) Received: (from riggs@localhost) by o503.hadiko.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0R8tWJR011008; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:55:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from riggs) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:55:32 +0100 From: "Thomas E. Zander" To: Lars Eggert Message-ID: <20040127085532.GA10896@o503.hadiko.de> References: <20040125000805.GE27786@o503.hadiko.de> <20040127075845.GB10363@o503.hadiko.de> <40161C38.5050101@netlab.nec.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40161C38.5050101@netlab.nec.de> Organization: RiggiServ - Ihr Partner =?iso-8859-15?Q?f?= =?iso-8859-15?Q?=FCr?= alles Delikate X-PGP-KeyID: 0xC85996CD X-PGP-URI: http://blackhole.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC85996CD X-PGP-Fingerprint: 4F59 75B4 4CE3 3B00 BC61 5400 8DD4 8929 C859 96CD X-Mailer: Riggisoft Ausguck Eggsbress (Build 1075193390) X-Operating-System: Riggiland BSD 5.2-CURRENT (To serve and protect.) cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thank you all! [was: Please test: mplayer 1.0pre3] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:55:40 -0000 --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 27. Jan 2004, at 9:07 +0100, Lars Eggert wrote according to [Re: Thank you all! [was: Please test: mplayer 1.0pre3]]: > Don't forget the TV functionality... Although there is not a difference from 0.92->1.0pre, I also hope that we get working tv functionality back on the way to 1.0. Thanks, Riggs --=20 - "[...] I talked to the computer at great length and -- explained my view of the Universe to it" said Marvin. --- And what happened?" pressed Ford. ---- "It committed suicide." said Marvin. --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFAFieEjdSJKchZls0RAkw9AJ4nbDRh2BkfkgAVYvfBZElsfbPyQgCfW2SC jCeoo6un/cpNZVw/nBrdQbw= =pnMF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 02:39:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9364716A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 02:39:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mignon.ki.iif.hu (mail.ki.iif.hu [193.6.222.240]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9604543D1F for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 02:39:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mohacsi@niif.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mignon.ki.iif.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9110C563B for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:39:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from mignon.ki.iif.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mignon.ki.iif.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 56053-03-11 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:39:13 +0100 (CET) Received: by mignon.ki.iif.hu (Postfix, from userid 1003) id D66315621; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:39:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mignon.ki.iif.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46F2561C for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:39:13 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:39:13 +0100 (CET) From: Mohacsi Janos X-X-Sender: mohacsi@mignon.ki.iif.hu To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040127112304.C48022@mignon.ki.iif.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: question: maintaining patch separately from ports cvs X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:39:28 -0000 Dear All, Are there any possible way to maintain a local patch against a certain port. Let's consider a following scenario: - There is port named foo/bar that is maintained and constantly updated by the certain maintainer of FreeBSD foo/bar port. - Somebody wants to use the port, but a heavily modified way e.g.: patched setup in chroot, jail environment, setup with certain configuration defaults, that is extremely local specific How can one achieve such scenario without interfering the FreeBSD port system and benefiting the regular update of the port? Best Regards, Janos Mohacsi Network Engineer, Research Associate NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY Key 00F9AF98: 8645 1312 D249 471B DBAE 21A2 9F52 0D1F 00F9 AF98 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 03:17:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F1716A4CE; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 03:17:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mxsf30.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf30.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A471043D6A; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 03:16:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from MrL0L@charter.net) Received: from charter.net (ts46-01-qdr3085.mrgnhll.ca.charter.com [68.118.70.19])i0RBFbeX080883; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 06:15:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from MrL0L@charter.net) Message-ID: <40164858.7050901@charter.net> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 03:15:36 -0800 From: Remi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040118 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: marcus@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: rhythmbox-0.6.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:17:04 -0000 Is anyone working on porting over the gnome-clipboard-daemon? I am interested in doing so and I just want to run it buy you guys to make sure no one is working on it ATM From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 04:15:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6081916A4CE; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 04:15:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from doom.homeunix.org (9-121.dialup.comset.net [213.172.9.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3065B43D6D; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 04:15:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from igor@doom.homeunix.org) Received: from doom.homeunix.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by doom.homeunix.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0RCForl008411; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:15:51 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from igor@doom.homeunix.org) Received: (from igor@localhost) by doom.homeunix.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0RC03N5008290; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:00:03 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from igor) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:00:03 +0300 From: Igor Pokrovsky To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040127120003.GA8184@doom.homeunix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ijliao@freebsd.org Subject: graphics/aqsis problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:15:58 -0000 Hello, I'm going to update port graphics/ayam to use aqsis as it's renderer. However when I'm trying to compile any sample shader with aqsl, it hangs. I've got a backtrace after interrupting aqsl: #0 0x282bd660 in __sys_poll () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4 #1 0x282bcb45 in _thread_kern_sched_state_unlock () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4 #2 0x282bc4fa in _thread_kern_scheduler () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4 #3 0x0 in ?? () So I'm unable to update graphics/ayam until the problem with aqsis persists. doom# uname -a FreeBSD doom.homeunix.org 4.9-STABLE FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE #0: Mon Jan 26 19:02:19 MSK 2004 root@doom.homeunix.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KERNEL i386 I can provide any additional information on request. P.S. Please CC me, I'm not subscribed. -ip -- Liquidity tends to run out. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 04:16:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0AB16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 04:16:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from spock.dilkie.com (spock.dilkie.com [206.51.1.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0213243D68 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 04:16:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lee@dilkie.com) Received: from borg (borg.dilkie.com [206.51.1.193]) (authenticated bits=0) by spock.dilkie.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0RCGTtY044824 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Jan 2004 07:16:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from lee@dilkie.com) From: "Lee Dilkie" To: "'Sean Chittenden'" , Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 07:16:28 -0500 Message-ID: <004401c3e4cf$647d91e0$c10133ce@dilkie.com> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20031020032632.GA40096@perrin.nxad.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Kopete 7.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:16:37 -0000 > > This is because your INDEX file is stale (it's almost always stale, > actually), but INDEX gets updated periodically (once every two-three > weeks or so) to combat this problem. Use `portsdb -Uu` to update your > index... it takes about 15-20min of really hard disk grinding (I do it > about nightly on a nice SCSI machine and then scp the resulting INDEX > to a farm of boxen). > > -sc > > -- > Sean Chittenden I always do a "make index" in the /usr/ports directory. Have I been doing it wrong? -lee From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 05:15:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C04C16A4CF for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 05:15:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from pm1.ric-37.lft.widomaker.com (pm1.ric-37.lft.widomaker.com [209.96.189.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C104E43D5D for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 05:15:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jason@pm1.ric-37.lft.widomaker.com) Received: (from jason@localhost) by pm1.ric-37.lft.widomaker.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i0RDFGPZ056072; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:15:16 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:15:13 -0500 From: Jason Harris To: Edward Epstein Message-ID: <20040127131513.GD360@pm1.ric-05.lft.widomaker.com> References: <200401262331.56417.peepstein@canada.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+xNpyl7Qekk2NvDX" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401262331.56417.peepstein@canada.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: Jason Harris cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ImageMagick Checksum Mismatch. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:15:43 -0000 --+xNpyl7Qekk2NvDX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 11:31:56PM -0800, Edward Epstein wrote: > I'm trying to upgrade graphics/ImageMagick, but it seems that there is a= =20 > checksum mismatch with the ImageMagick-5.5.7-15.tar.bz2 file. > md5 checksum from ImageMagick distinfo file: > MD5 (ImageMagick-5.5.7-15.tar.bz2) =3D 80144cc67bb9888b26f9704362269487 >=20 > md5 checksum from ImageMagick source file downloaded from=20 > ftp.imagemagick.org/pub/ImageMagick: > MD5 (ImageMagick-5.5.7-15.tar.bz2) =3D 6780f81dee32f1e8d2f277b6fe621955 >=20 > I've re-downloaded the file multiple times from the site, just in case th= ere=20 > was a problem with the download. Also, I've pulled the same file from som= e=20 > mirrors and noticed that the checksums from the mirrors match the checksu= m=20 > from the official imagemagick.org ftp site, not the checksum in the disti= nfo=20 > file (which makes sense if the mirrors pull the file automagically from t= he=20 > main site). There might have been a reroll. The sf.net servers appear internally consistent (for the RR servers (HTTP and FTP) actually used), and the rest appear consistent: [make fetch w/wget -x invocation] %find . -name \*.bz2 | xargs esha1sum | sort 2557c38b60f2459d54166a689067e9d0a6a1c44e 4218283 ./eu.dl.sourceforge= .net/imagemagick/ImageMagick-5.5.7-15.tar.bz2 2557c38b60f2459d54166a689067e9d0a6a1c44e 4218283 ./ftp.chg.ru/pub/so= urceforge/imagemagick/ImageMagick-5.5.7-15.tar.bz2 2557c38b60f2459d54166a689067e9d0a6a1c44e 4218283 ./sourceforge.alero= n.net/imagemagick/ImageMagick-5.5.7-15.tar.bz2 2557c38b60f2459d54166a689067e9d0a6a1c44e 4218283 ./us.dl.sourceforge= .net/imagemagick/ImageMagick-5.5.7-15.tar.bz2 2557c38b60f2459d54166a689067e9d0a6a1c44e 4218283 ./us.dl.sourceforge= .net/pub/sourceforge/imagemagick/ImageMagick-5.5.7-15.tar.bz2 a3c903f7ce0d001f45b9ed68907086c2153780ce 4214144 ./ftp.eos.hokudai.a= c.jp/pub/graphics/ImageMagick/ImageMagick-5.5.7-15.tar.bz2 a3c903f7ce0d001f45b9ed68907086c2153780ce 4214144 ./ftp.fifi.org/pub/= ImageMagick/ImageMagick-5.5.7-15.tar.bz2 a3c903f7ce0d001f45b9ed68907086c2153780ce 4214144 ./ftp.fu-berlin.de/= unix/X11/graphics/ImageMagick/ImageMagick-5.5.7-15.tar.bz2 a3c903f7ce0d001f45b9ed68907086c2153780ce 4214144 ./ftp.imagemagick.o= rg/pub/ImageMagick/ImageMagick-5.5.7-15.tar.bz2 a3c903f7ce0d001f45b9ed68907086c2153780ce 4214144 ./ftp.kddlabs.co.jp= /graphics/ImageMagick/ImageMagick-5.5.7-15.tar.bz2 a3c903f7ce0d001f45b9ed68907086c2153780ce 4214144 ./ftp.planetmirror.= com/pub/imagemagick/ImageMagick-5.5.7-15.tar.bz2 a3c903f7ce0d001f45b9ed68907086c2153780ce 4214144 ./ftp.simplesystems= .org/pub/ImageMagick/ImageMagick-5.5.7-15.tar.bz2 a3c903f7ce0d001f45b9ed68907086c2153780ce 4214144 ./gd.tuwien.ac.at/p= ub/graphics/ImageMagick/ImageMagick-5.5.7-15.tar.bz2 a3c903f7ce0d001f45b9ed68907086c2153780ce 4214144 ./giswitch.sggw.waw= .pl/pub/graphics/ImageMagick/ImageMagick-5.5.7-15.tar.bz2 a3c903f7ce0d001f45b9ed68907086c2153780ce 4214144 ./www.t.ring.gr.jp/= archives/graphics/ImageMagick/ImageMagick-5.5.7-15.tar.bz2 a3c903f7ce0d001f45b9ed68907086c2153780ce 4214144 ./www.t.ring.gr.jp/= pub/graphics/ImageMagick/ImageMagick-5.5.7-15.tar.bz2 --=20 Jason Harris | NIC: JH329, PGP: This _is_ PGP-signed, isn't it? jharris@widomaker.com | web: http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/ --+xNpyl7Qekk2NvDX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAFmRfSypIl9OdoOMRApWRAKCICWtgXJBU5JExSSNbvdTtYtLxDwCfZ7Mi 4uM8+alMHiovhY5fXtE/UsY= =sLph -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+xNpyl7Qekk2NvDX-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 06:50:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D988816A4CF for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 06:50:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rrcs-midsouth-24-172-16-118.biz.rr.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E938543D4C for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 06:50:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [10.2.1.4] (vpn-client-4.marcuscom.com [10.2.1.4]) i0RElusm097854; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:47:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Remi In-Reply-To: <40164858.7050901@charter.net> References: <40164858.7050901@charter.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-jkRbAn3Abj4V3Dr8sEkV" Organization: FreeBSD, Inc. Message-Id: <1075215017.720.3.camel@gyros> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:50:17 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: rhythmbox-0.6.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 14:50:43 -0000 --=-jkRbAn3Abj4V3Dr8sEkV Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 06:15, Remi wrote: > Is anyone working on porting over the gnome-clipboard-daemon? I am=20 > interested in doing so and I just want to run it buy you guys to make=20 > sure no one is working on it ATM Why put rhythmbox-0.6.4 as the subject of an email asking about the gnome-clipboard-daemon? Please try to make your subjects more topical in the future. The g-c-b is already in the ports tree under the x11 category. Joe --=20 Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: marcus@FreeBSD.org gnome@FreeBSD.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome --=-jkRbAn3Abj4V3Dr8sEkV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAFnqpb2iPiv4Uz4cRAjNoAKChjwwT5E3YLNKjhdSTH66c1cq+xACgiU/w C6QxkGVdN2uOwwiegRX0IdE= =kzT+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-jkRbAn3Abj4V3Dr8sEkV-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 07:04:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E2016A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 07:04:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from blues.jpj.net (blues.jpj.net [208.210.80.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E43B43D2D for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 07:04:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from trevor@jpj.net) Received: from blues.jpj.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blues.jpj.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0RF4Zrr001620; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:04:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from trevor@jpj.net) Received: from localhost (trevor@localhost)i0RF4Z5w001617; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:04:35 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: blues.jpj.net: trevor owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:04:35 -0500 (EST) From: Trevor Johnson To: Diego Montalvo In-Reply-To: <20040127015209.88359.qmail@web60306.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20040127100036.T41933@blues.jpj.net> References: <20040127015209.88359.qmail@web60306.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compress a freebsd .tbz port. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:04:35 -0000 Hi Diego--the .tbz is short for .tar.bz2, a tar file that was compressed with bzip2. -- Trevor Johnson From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 07:18:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A7CD16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 07:18:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mxintern.schlund.de (mxintern.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1499A43D60 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 07:18:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from alex.kiesel@document-root.de) Received: from [172.17.29.6] (helo=alex.i.schlund.de) by mxintern.kundenserver.de with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AlUyr-0001kz-00 for ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:18:21 +0100 Received: (qmail 2279 invoked by uid 519); 27 Jan 2004 15:18:21 -0000 From: Alex Kiesel To: eta@lclark.edu In-Reply-To: <1068496497.690.85.camel@leguin> References: <1068489988.33385.13.camel@frax.errornet.lan> <1068496497.690.85.camel@leguin> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1075216701.2137.1.camel@alex.i.schlund.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:18:21 +0100 cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Simon Dassow Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: libglut-5.0.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:18:28 -0000 On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 21:34, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 10:46, Simon Dassow wrote: > > Hi, > > is there something known to be broken? > > I recently wanted to make and got the following error: > > > > Warning: Object directory not changed from original > > /usr/ports/graphics/libglut/work/Mesa-5.0.2/src-glut > > cc -fpic -DPIC -O -pipe -march=k6 -I../include -I/usr/X11R6/include -c > > glut_cindex.c -o glut_cindex.So > > /usr/libexec/elf/ld: cannot find -lGL > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/libglut/work/Mesa-5.0.2/src-glut. > > > > > > I'm using the nvidia-driver, so i dont know if it matters, but i think > > it shouldn't. > > The way i fixed it, or better worked around it: > > > > # cd /usr/ports/graphics/libglut/work/Mesa-5.0.2/src-glut > > # make |grep cc| sed -e 's#\(-I/usr/X11R6/include\)#\1 > > -L/usr/X11R6/lib#' > > # cc -fpic -DPIC -O -pipe -march=k6 -I../include -I/usr/X11R6/include > > -L/usr/X11R6/lib -c glut_cindex.c -o glut_cindex.So > > > > Then i got the next error... i've did it the same way like written above > > for... about 20 times. > > > > Seems now i have glut working. > > > > Is this related to the nvidia-driver? > > Yes, it's apparently related to the nvidia driver. I'm not sure why. > I'll take a look at this RSN. Hi, removing "-lGL" from src-glut/Makefile fixed the build... However, I did not check whether it works... -Alex From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 08:02:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6664516A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:02:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from outpost.globcon.net (outpost.globcon.net [62.141.88.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F135943D69 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:02:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sergei@kolobov.com) Received: (qmail 40789 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2004 16:02:30 -0000 Received: from agdcgw01.akingump.com (HELO kolobov.com) (12.40.174.2) by outpost.globcon.net (62.141.88.161) with SMTP; 27 Jan 2004 16:02:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 1535 invoked by uid 911); 27 Jan 2004 16:02:04 -0000 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 19:02:04 +0300 From: Sergei Kolobov To: Joe Marcus Clarke Message-ID: <20040127160204.GA704@chetwood.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Joe Marcus Clarke , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: <1075068827.93327.13.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1075068827.93327.13.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/49955: [PATCH] bsd.port.mk: add target to automatically install port documentation X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:02:53 -0000 --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline (cc'd to ports@ to get a broader feedback) On 2004-01-25 at 17:13 -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > Was this taken care of in eik's PORTDOCS work? No - PORTDOCS was created with a different goal, I think. To summarize: PORTDOCS dramatically reduces pkg-plist size in case there are a lot of files and/or subdirs under DOCSDIR. For example, PORTDOCS=*. My patch (let's call it DOCS) is for far more common scenario (in my experience, at least) - there are just a few docs files which could (and should) be listed explicitly. I just had an idea how this two approaches be combined into single framework: Ports that have few doc files get this: DOCS= file1 file2 subdir/file3 Ports that have a lot of doc files could use this (renamed from PORTDOCS[1]): DOCS_GLOB= * In both cases, you have a knob to control what's bsd.port.mk does for you automatically: USE_DOCS= yes # Does everything (see below) USE_DOCS= plist # Only adds docs to final pkg-plist USE_DOCS= install # Only installs files to ${DOCSDIR}, # you will need to list the files in pkg-plist # explicitly USE_DOCS= all # Alias to USE_DOCS=yes Then, USE_DOCS=yes could be made a default if DOCS or DOCS_GLOB is defined: .if defined(DOCS) || defined(DOCS_GLOB) USE_DOCS?= yes .endif If this approach is feasible, I'll submit a patch. Sergei [1] I think DOCS is a better variable name than PORTDOCS: DOCS is in line with MAN1 - MAN9, INFO, etc. We all know it's a variable is inside port's Makefile, so "PORT" prefix is kind of superfluous (sp?). --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAFot8FOxuaTulNAERAqGhAJ4/dVDoEK15en2ZKmB/iyMhqCdmkQCfQJRU Iq+PBZmTApgAXN1pCbrQuB8= =EdvK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 08:54:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A16516A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:54:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4823343D31 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:54:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from turbo23@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 22827 invoked by uid 0); 27 Jan 2004 16:53:47 -0000 Received: from 62.204.106.135 by www28.gmx.net with HTTP; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:53:48 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:53:48 +0100 (MET) From: "Thomas Vogt" To: ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Authenticated: #627573 Message-ID: <8981.1075222428@www28.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.6 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: linux_base end of life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:54:57 -0000 Hi As far as I know, the linux_base packages and the port itself are based on RedHat 7.x. RedHat 7.x and 8.x reached end of life at the end of last year (2003-12-31). 9.x will reach it's end of life on the 30th of April 2004. There are no more security updates availble for redhat 7x/8x, and most probably neither for the current linux_base system. Are there any plans to switch to another linux distribution as base package? cheers Thomas Vogt -- +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++ Bis 31.1.: TopMail + Digicam für nur 29 EUR http://www.gmx.net/topmail From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 08:56:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09FDF16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:56:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from conversation.bsdunix.ch (zux187-250.adsl.green.ch [80.254.187.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9050E43D86 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:55:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from turbo23@gmx.net) Received: from gmx.net (135.catv106.lgt01.lan.ch [62.204.106.135]) (authenticated bits=0)i0RCOOnJ074133 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:24:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from turbo23@gmx.net) Message-ID: <4016599C.1030408@gmx.net> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:29:16 +0100 From: Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5a (Windows/20040113) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on conversation.bsdunix.ch Subject: linux_base end of life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:56:00 -0000 Hi As far as I know, the linux_base packages and the port itself are based on RedHat 7.x. RedHat 7.x and 8.x reached end of life at the end of last year (2003-12-31). 9.x will reach it's end of life on the 30th of April 2004. There are no more security updates availble for redhat 7x/8x, and most probably neither for the current linux_base system. Are there any plans to switch to another linux distribution as base package? cheers Thomas Vogt From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 10:18:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC1A16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:18:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from blues.jpj.net (blues.jpj.net [208.210.80.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA1A43D67 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:17:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from trevor@jpj.net) Received: from blues.jpj.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blues.jpj.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0RIHnrr021353; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:17:49 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from trevor@jpj.net) Received: from localhost (trevor@localhost)i0RIHkkf021347; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:17:47 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: blues.jpj.net: trevor owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:17:46 -0500 (EST) From: Trevor Johnson To: Thomas Vogt In-Reply-To: <8981.1075222428@www28.gmx.net> Message-ID: <20040127123708.A1639@blues.jpj.net> References: <8981.1075222428@www28.gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux_base end of life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 18:18:15 -0000 > Hi Hi! > As far as I know, the linux_base packages and the port itself are based on > RedHat 7.x. RedHat 7.x and 8.x reached end of life at the end of last year > (2003-12-31). 9.x will reach it's end of life on the 30th of April 2004. > There are no more security updates availble for redhat 7x/8x, and most > probably neither for the current linux_base system. There are a couple (RHSA-2003:325 and RHSA-2003:287) that haven't been fully brought into the ports collection. It's possible for us to prepare our own RPMs. Red Hat 7.2 for the Alpha is supposed to be maintained by Hewlett-Packard. I'm not sure whether they still keep up with updates for it. They did as recently as September. > Are there any plans to switch to another linux distribution as base package? Well, we have ports of Debian and Gentoo. I haven't tried any of the numerous RPM-based ports with either of those; my guess would be that with Debian's "alien" facility, they could be made to co-exist with it, and that much of what we have in the ports collection is available in Gentoo's portage. Other work they need is: - update Gentoo port so it's fetchable for all architectures - update Debian port - add Alpha support to Debian port - make a port of portage to accompany Gentoo port Do you have suggestions for other Linux distributions that could go in the ports collection? Ones that support both Alpha and i386, are RPM-based, have some popularity and can be downloaded would be ideal IMO. -- Trevor Johnson From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 10:32:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C486016A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:32:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from web60807.mail.yahoo.com (web60807.mail.yahoo.com [216.155.196.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9821543D5F for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:31:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from richard_bejtlich@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040127183127.51107.qmail@web60807.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.84.6.72] by web60807.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:31:27 PST Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:31:27 -0800 (PST) From: Richard Bejtlich To: ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: dugsong@monkey.org Subject: Fragroute on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 18:32:09 -0000 Hello, I am not having any luck running the latest version of Fragroute (1.2) built from /usr/ports/security/fragroute on either FreeBSD 4.9 STABLE, 5.2 REL, or, for comparison's sake, OpenBSD 3.4. FreeBSD gives the following errors: arplookup 172.27.20.5 failed: could not allocate llinfo arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 172.27.20.5rt (172.27.20.5 is the host running Fragroute) OpenBSD gives a similar error: arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo Fragroute runs without a problem on a Red Hat 9 box. Any ideas? Thank you, Richard Bejtlich http://www.taosecurity.com __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 12:04:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C49316A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:04:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E4B43D78 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:04:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i0RK2I212939; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:02:18 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: "Lee Dilkie" , "'Sean Chittenden'" , Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:02:17 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <004401c3e4cf$647d91e0$c10133ce@dilkie.com> In-Reply-To: <004401c3e4cf$647d91e0$c10133ce@dilkie.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401271202.17222.kstewart@owt.com> cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kopete 7.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 20:04:36 -0000 On Tuesday 27 January 2004 04:16 am, Lee Dilkie wrote: > > This is because your INDEX file is stale (it's almost always stale, > > actually), but INDEX gets updated periodically (once every > > two-three weeks or so) to combat this problem. Use `portsdb -Uu` > > to update your index... it takes about 15-20min of really hard disk > > grinding (I do it about nightly on a nice SCSI machine and then scp > > the resulting INDEX to a farm of boxen). > > > > -sc > > > > -- > > Sean Chittenden > > I always do a "make index" in the /usr/ports directory. Have I been > doing it wrong? > No, I also use make index because historically there were significantly fewer error messages. I think someone almost got hysterical from surprise a short time ago when portsdb -U completed with out a single message. My attitude is that if Kris' script ran portsdb -U, then I would use it everytime I cvsup ports-all instead of using make index. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 12:55:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF0C16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:55:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from wckn.com (wckn.dorm.clarkson.edu [128.153.216.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0A343D6A for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:55:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cohentl@wckn.com) Received: from cohentl (helo=localhost) by wckn.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AlZq3-0001Yx-00 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:29:35 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:29:35 -0500 (EST) From: Todd Cohen To: ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: FreeBSD 4.9 Release and Arla X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 20:55:24 -0000 Just installed FreeBSD 4.9, did a cvsup to get the ports colletion and trying to build alra from /usr/ports/net/arla/. Can someone point me in the right direction? Not subscribed to the list, so please CC me. Thanks. ===> Building for arla-0.35.6 SUBDIRS='include lib util ydr lwp rxdef lib/ko rx lib/bufdir rxkad xfs arlad conf appl tests doc'; for i in $SUBDIRS; do (cd $i && make all) || exit 1; done SUBDIRS='roken sl acl cmd'; for i in $SUBDIRS; do (cd $i && make all) || exit 1; done cc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/usr/local/etc\" -DARLACACHEDIR=\"/usr/local/cache\" -DARLACONFFILE=\"/usr/local/etc/arla.conf\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DARLAOS=\"freebsd4.9\" -DARLAVENDOR=\"portbld\" -DARLACPU=\"i386\" -I. -I. -I../../include -I./../../include -I../.. -I./../.. -I../../rxdef -I../../include -DINET6 -g -O -pipe -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wbad-function-cast -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs koerror.c koerror.c:54: des.h: No such file or directory In file included from koerror.c:55: ../../include/rxkad.h:110: warning: `MAXKTCTICKETLEN' redefined ../../rxdef/ka.h:189: warning: this is the location of the previous definition *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/arla/work/arla-0.35.6/lib/ko. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/arla/work/arla-0.35.6. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/arla. lizard# __________________________________________________________________________ "Yes, but I love gatherings. Isn't it ironic?" "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned for Sega." http://wckn.clarkson.edu/~cohentl/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 12:59:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F3116A4CE; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:59:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.ibbsonline.com (mx1.ibbsonline.com [67.32.118.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E63E43D5E; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:59:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jwimb@patmedia.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.ibbsonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E918B10C51F; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:05:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx1.ibbsonline.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.ibbsonline.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26840-08; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:05:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.patmedia.net (mail.patmedia.net [67.32.118.35]) by mx1.ibbsonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2287110C645; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:05:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from patmedia.net (host-24-225-205-147.patmedia.net [24.225.205.147]) by mail.patmedia.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B354CC84; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:53:36 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4016D0B7.2050607@patmedia.net> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:57:27 -0500 From: James Ballantine User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hiroki Sato Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ibbsonline.com cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: jwb@homer.att.com Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: docbook-xml-4.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jwimb@patmedia.net, jwb@homer.att.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 20:59:47 -0000 Hiroki Sato wrote: Hmmm, it is strange. You can remove a line CATALOG "/usr/local/share/xml/docbook/4.2/docbook/cat" in /usr/local/share.catalog manually and reinstall docbook-xml. I tried that and found # pwd /usr/local/share/sgml # ls catalog docbook linuxdoc tmac catalog.ports iso8879 otranspec transpec # cat catalog -- Created by xmlcatmgr-2.0alpha2 -- CATALOG "catalog.ports" When I did a deinstall/install I got : # cd ../docbook-xml # make deinstall ===> Deinstalling for textproc/docbook-xml ===> docbook-xml not installed, skipping # make install ===> Installing for docbook-xml-4.2_1 ===> docbook-xml-4.2_1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/xmlcatmgr - found ===> Generating temporary packing list ===> Checking if textproc/docbook-xml already installed for file in `unzip -l /usr/ports/distfiles/docbook-xml-4.2.zip|/usr/bin/awk '/:[ 0-9].*[^\/]$/{print $4}'`; do install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 /usr/ports/tex tproc/docbook-xml/work/$file /usr/local/share/xml/docbook/4.2/$file; done xmlcatmgr: entry already exists for `/usr/local/share/xml/docbook/4.2/catalog.xm l' of type `nextCatalog' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/docbook-xml. Is there a port that I can deinstall that will remove all the docbook ports so I can start from ground zero again? Thanks Jim Ballantine From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 13:00:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15CCA16A4CF for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:00:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from conversation.bsdunix.ch (zux187-250.adsl.green.ch [80.254.187.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B0843D6B for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:00:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from turbo23@gmx.net) Received: from gmx.net (135.catv106.lgt01.lan.ch [62.204.106.135]) (authenticated bits=0)i0RKwlnJ080636 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Jan 2004 21:58:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from turbo23@gmx.net) Message-ID: <4016D217.7000406@gmx.net> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 22:03:19 +0100 From: Thomas Vogt User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5a (Windows/20040113) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Trevor Johnson References: <8981.1075222428@www28.gmx.net> <20040127123708.A1639@blues.jpj.net> In-Reply-To: <20040127123708.A1639@blues.jpj.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on conversation.bsdunix.ch cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux_base end of life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 21:00:56 -0000 Helo Trevor Johnson wrote: > There are a couple (RHSA-2003:325 and RHSA-2003:287) that haven't been > fully brought into the ports collection. Why? Was the fixed glibc not working anymore? > It's possible for us to prepare our own RPMs. Sure. But then "we" have to downgrade every patch to fit into the system. Could be a lot of work. > Well, we have ports of Debian and Gentoo. I haven't tried any of the > numerous RPM-based ports with either of those; my guess would be that with > Debian's "alien" facility, they could be made to co-exist with it, and > that much of what we have in the ports collection is available in Gentoo's > portage. Other work they need is: > > - update Gentoo port so it's fetchable for all architectures > - update Debian port > - add Alpha support to Debian port > - make a port of portage to accompany Gentoo port > > Do you have suggestions for other Linux distributions that could go in the > ports collection? Ones that support both Alpha and i386, are RPM-based, > have some popularity and can be downloaded would be ideal IMO. Hmm the only distribution that fits this description is Suse, IMHO. But perhaps Debian or Gentoo. Those distros don't suffer from potential corporate interests like RedHat or Suse, thus giving us more leeway. regards, Thomas From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 13:08:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D65F16A4CE; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:08:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx2.ibbsonline.com (mx2.ibbsonline.com [67.32.118.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DEC43D79; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:07:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jwimb@patmedia.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.ibbsonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A46FC7E4; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:12:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx2.ibbsonline.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.ibbsonline.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12269-03; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:12:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.patmedia.net (mail.patmedia.net [67.32.118.35]) by mx2.ibbsonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0DEAFC859; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:11:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from patmedia.net (host-24-225-205-147.patmedia.net [24.225.205.147]) by mail.patmedia.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898D14C448; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:00:38 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4016D260.1060803@patmedia.net> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:04:32 -0500 From: James Ballantine User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hiroki Sato Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ibbsonline.com cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: jwb@homer.att.com Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: docbook-xml-4.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jwimb@patmedia.net, jwb@homer.att.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 21:08:09 -0000 Hiroki Sato wrote: Hmmm, it is strange. You can remove a line CATALOG "/usr/local/share/xml/docbook/4.2/docbook/cat" in /usr/local/share.catalog manually and reinstall docbook-xml. I tried that and found # pwd /usr/local/share/sgml # ls catalog docbook linuxdoc tmac catalog.ports iso8879 otranspec transpec # cat catalog -- Created by xmlcatmgr-2.0alpha2 -- CATALOG "catalog.ports" When I did a deinstall/install I got : # cd ../docbook-xml # make deinstall ===> Deinstalling for textproc/docbook-xml ===> docbook-xml not installed, skipping # make install ===> Installing for docbook-xml-4.2_1 ===> docbook-xml-4.2_1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/xmlcatmgr - found ===> Generating temporary packing list ===> Checking if textproc/docbook-xml already installed for file in `unzip -l /usr/ports/distfiles/docbook-xml-4.2.zip|/usr/bin/awk '/:[ 0-9].*[^\/]$/{print $4}'`; do install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 /usr/ports/tex tproc/docbook-xml/work/$file /usr/local/share/xml/docbook/4.2/$file; done xmlcatmgr: entry already exists for `/usr/local/share/xml/docbook/4.2/catalog.xm l' of type `nextCatalog' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/docbook-xml. Is there a port that I can deinstall that will remove all the docbook ports so I can start from ground zero again? Thanks Jim Ballantine From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 13:34:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B862216A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:34:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-119-53-122.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A8E43D54 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:34:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4D10C66C78; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:34:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:34:01 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Mohacsi Janos Message-ID: <20040127213401.GA68505@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040127112304.C48022@mignon.ki.iif.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040127112304.C48022@mignon.ki.iif.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question: maintaining patch separately from ports cvs X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 21:34:44 -0000 --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:39:13AM +0100, Mohacsi Janos wrote: > Dear All, > Are there any possible way to maintain a local patch against a > certain port. > Let's consider a following scenario: > - There is port named foo/bar that is maintained and constantly updated by > the certain maintainer of FreeBSD foo/bar port. > - Somebody wants to use the port, but a heavily modified way e.g.: > patched setup in chroot, jail environment, setup with certain > configuration defaults, that is extremely local specific >=20 > How can one achieve such scenario without interfering the FreeBSD port > system and benefiting the regular update of the port? Use cvs to check out and update your ports tree - see the handbook for documentation. Kris --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAFtlIWry0BWjoQKURAgIeAKDPS9Oa3GZuAUTuUp+h/y3QiUx7vwCfd3wO 48N+G0b56sNu44WGWR14RLA= =z1f5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 13:39:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1295416A4CF for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:39:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-119-53-122.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8259443D7E for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:38:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4CFA266C78; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:37:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:37:18 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Kent Stewart Message-ID: <20040127213718.GC68505@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <004401c3e4cf$647d91e0$c10133ce@dilkie.com> <200401271202.17222.kstewart@owt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="H8ygTp4AXg6deix2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401271202.17222.kstewart@owt.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: mdunham@kestrelworks.com cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kopete 7.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 21:39:33 -0000 --H8ygTp4AXg6deix2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:02:17PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: > > I always do a "make index" in the /usr/ports directory. Have I been > > doing it wrong? > > >=20 > No, I also use make index because historically there were significantly= =20 > fewer error messages. I think someone almost got hysterical from=20 > surprise a short time ago when portsdb -U completed with out a single=20 > message.=20 >=20 > My attitude is that if Kris' script ran portsdb -U, then I would use it= =20 > everytime I cvsup ports-all instead of using make index. AFAIK portsdb -U just calls 'make index' internally. The difference would then presumably be caused by the make environment: my index build tests simulate a clean environment by defining LOCALBASE, X11BASE, etc. Kris --H8ygTp4AXg6deix2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAFtoNWry0BWjoQKURAnCeAJoDvtCMDVyGyjxGbXzNU9kEwk2/iQCfXcmV ZMDZNvlO+bZR66itg2huPfc= =bf3z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --H8ygTp4AXg6deix2-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 14:40:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907C916A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 14:40:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C8E43D5E for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 14:39:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i0RMbw207526; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 14:37:58 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: Kris Kennaway Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 14:37:57 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <004401c3e4cf$647d91e0$c10133ce@dilkie.com> <200401271202.17222.kstewart@owt.com> <20040127213718.GC68505@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040127213718.GC68505@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401271437.57571.kstewart@owt.com> cc: mdunham@kestrelworks.com cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kopete 7.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 22:40:01 -0000 On Tuesday 27 January 2004 01:37 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:02:17PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: > > > I always do a "make index" in the /usr/ports directory. Have I > > > been doing it wrong? > > > > No, I also use make index because historically there were > > significantly fewer error messages. I think someone almost got > > hysterical from surprise a short time ago when portsdb -U completed > > with out a single message. > > > > My attitude is that if Kris' script ran portsdb -U, then I would > > use it everytime I cvsup ports-all instead of using make index. > > AFAIK portsdb -U just calls 'make index' internally. The difference > would then presumably be caused by the make environment: my index > build tests simulate a clean environment by defining LOCALBASE, > X11BASE, etc. That hasn't always been true. Make index would find 1 or 2 more ports than -U would. There are also times when make index falls flat and -U would still produce a useful INDEX. In addition, portsdb -U used to run quite a bit faster than make index did. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 15:20:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77FB16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:20:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (mailout.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E606943D3F for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:20:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from barner@in.tum.de) Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 064B69309; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:19:47 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:19:47 +0100 From: Simon Barner To: Todd Cohen Message-ID: <20040127231947.GH15226@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vs0rQTeTompTJjtd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.tu-muenchen.de cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.9 Release and Arla X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:20:21 -0000 --vs0rQTeTompTJjtd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Todd Cohen wrote: > koerror.c:54: des.h: No such file or directory > In file included from koerror.c:55: > ../../include/rxkad.h:110: warning: `MAXKTCTICKETLEN' redefined > ../../rxdef/ka.h:189: warning: this is the location of the previous > definition > *** Error code 1 Do you have OpenSSL installed? It's either in the base system (check /usr/include/openssl/ whether des.h is there), or in the security/openssl port (check /usr/local/include/openssl). Simon --vs0rQTeTompTJjtd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAFvITCkn+/eutqCoRAmtnAKDY/7h+NJiV0p3oDyhUSG2D4VDKIQCgnRDA kcszE/JFtbevzd2PEbzvm+Y= =OBO9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vs0rQTeTompTJjtd-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 15:26:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD39116A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:26:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-119-53-122.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C719743D6E for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:26:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 700C166DF2; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:26:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:26:18 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Kent Stewart Message-ID: <20040127232618.GB69820@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <004401c3e4cf$647d91e0$c10133ce@dilkie.com> <200401271202.17222.kstewart@owt.com> <20040127213718.GC68505@xor.obsecurity.org> <200401271437.57571.kstewart@owt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401271437.57571.kstewart@owt.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: mdunham@kestrelworks.com cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Kopete 7.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:26:53 -0000 --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 02:37:57PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: > On Tuesday 27 January 2004 01:37 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:02:17PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: > > > > I always do a "make index" in the /usr/ports directory. Have I > > > > been doing it wrong? > > > > > > No, I also use make index because historically there were > > > significantly fewer error messages. I think someone almost got > > > hysterical from surprise a short time ago when portsdb -U completed > > > with out a single message. > > > > > > My attitude is that if Kris' script ran portsdb -U, then I would > > > use it everytime I cvsup ports-all instead of using make index. > > > > AFAIK portsdb -U just calls 'make index' internally. The difference > > would then presumably be caused by the make environment: my index > > build tests simulate a clean environment by defining LOCALBASE, > > X11BASE, etc. >=20 > That hasn't always been true. Make index would find 1 or 2 more ports=20 > than -U would. There are also times when make index falls flat and -U=20 > would still produce a useful INDEX. In addition, portsdb -U used to run= =20 > quite a bit faster than make index did. OK, it looks like (now?) it's rolling its own INDEX build in native ruby. I'll take a look at it to see if it produces any different results on a clean ports tree, and if so, why. Kris --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAFvOaWry0BWjoQKURAhTkAJ9sTbE339umNSMdlWfpd2bo2iO/QQCgkD77 AtlAOiqqdWhz3oCaO/tjB+0= =uR+I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 15:27:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502A616A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:27:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from postman.arcor.de (postman2.arcor-online.net [151.189.0.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CE443D41 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:27:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-51-21.reverse.qsc.de [212.202.51.21]) (authenticated bits=0)i0RNQsgG014239 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:26:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from [172.16.0.2] (helo=fillmore-labs.com) by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1Alcbd-000Dtd-T9; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:26:53 +0100 Message-ID: <4016F3BD.4040001@fillmore-labs.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:26:53 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH - http://www.fillmore-labs.com/ MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <004401c3e4cf$647d91e0$c10133ce@dilkie.com> <200401271202.17222.kstewart@owt.com> <20040127213718.GC68505@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040127213718.GC68505@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 cc: mdunham@kestrelworks.com cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org cc: Kent Stewart Subject: Re: Kopete 7.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:27:31 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:02:17PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: > >>>I always do a "make index" in the /usr/ports directory. Have I been >>>doing it wrong? >> >>No, I also use make index because historically there were significantly >>fewer error messages. I think someone almost got hysterical from >>surprise a short time ago when portsdb -U completed with out a single >>message. >> >>My attitude is that if Kris' script ran portsdb -U, then I would use it >>everytime I cvsup ports-all instead of using make index. > > AFAIK portsdb -U just calls 'make index' internally. The difference > would then presumably be caused by the make environment: my index > build tests simulate a clean environment by defining LOCALBASE, > X11BASE, etc. Not really. portsdb -U calls portsdb.update, which is defined in /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/portsdb.rb under 'def update' and calls /usr/local/sbin/make_describe_pass1 /usr/local/sbin/make_describe_pass2 /usr/ports/Tools/make_index But I guess knu is the expert here... From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 15:37:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB7016A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:37:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout09.sul.t-online.com (mailout09.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A45643D6D for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:37:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from fwd05.aul.t-online.de by mailout09.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1AlThe-0008OP-01; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 14:56:30 +0100 Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (Z6ucriZYre0s2RuZuqg+u61xZBg-2hwptNT3sQVmyRhguL3VSV4HYz@[217.83.21.60]) by fmrl05.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1AlTgc-0o5eMK0; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 14:55:26 +0100 Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) i0RDtJJb002644 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 14:55:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (netchild@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0RDtIPV027857 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 14:55:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 14:55:18 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: ports@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040127145518.33cd1648@Magellan.Leidinger.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Seen: false X-ID: Z6ucriZYre0s2RuZuqg+u61xZBg-2hwptNT3sQVmyRhguL3VSV4HYz@t-dialin.net Subject: Do we need a new major category (latex)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:37:32 -0000 Hi, ls -1 print/*latex* |wc -l 206 ls -1 */*latex* | wc -l 349 Bye, Alexander. -- I will be available to get hired in April 2004. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 15:40:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4BC416A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:40:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-119-53-122.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97BBA43D67 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:40:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1608966C78; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:40:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:40:20 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Alexander Leidinger Message-ID: <20040127234019.GA70137@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040127145518.33cd1648@Magellan.Leidinger.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040127145518.33cd1648@Magellan.Leidinger.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do we need a new major category (latex)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:40:26 -0000 --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 02:55:18PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Hi, >=20 > ls -1 print/*latex* |wc -l > 206 >=20 > ls -1 */*latex* | wc -l > 349 That sounds like a good idea, except it should be called tex. Kris --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAFvbjWry0BWjoQKURAscWAJ42SZSscmxPVDCswrUv8oL7OjAKfwCfRjjn SrShKZkojTlN2Ne9zwxG6uI= =Zd0b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 15:43:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D458416A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:43:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-119-53-122.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED18A43D72 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:43:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BF08766C78; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:43:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:43:05 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Kent Stewart Message-ID: <20040127234305.GA70166@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <004401c3e4cf$647d91e0$c10133ce@dilkie.com> <200401271202.17222.kstewart@owt.com> <20040127213718.GC68505@xor.obsecurity.org> <200401271437.57571.kstewart@owt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401271437.57571.kstewart@owt.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: mdunham@kestrelworks.com cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: portsdb -U vs make index (Re: Kopete 7.3) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:43:51 -0000 --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 02:37:57PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: > On Tuesday 27 January 2004 01:37 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:02:17PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: > > > > I always do a "make index" in the /usr/ports directory. Have I > > > > been doing it wrong? > > > > > > No, I also use make index because historically there were > > > significantly fewer error messages. I think someone almost got > > > hysterical from surprise a short time ago when portsdb -U completed > > > with out a single message. > > > > > > My attitude is that if Kris' script ran portsdb -U, then I would > > > use it everytime I cvsup ports-all instead of using make index. > > > > AFAIK portsdb -U just calls 'make index' internally. The difference > > would then presumably be caused by the make environment: my index > > build tests simulate a clean environment by defining LOCALBASE, > > X11BASE, etc. >=20 > That hasn't always been true. Make index would find 1 or 2 more ports=20 > than -U would. There are also times when make index falls flat and -U=20 > would still produce a useful INDEX. In addition, portsdb -U used to run= =20 > quite a bit faster than make index did. I'm seeing what look like data corruption from portsdb -U: Updating the ports index ... p5-DateTime-Format-HTTP-0.35:"" non-existent -= - dependency list incomplete ind/Rule.pm:/usr/ports/devel/p5-File-Find-Rule /foobar/lib/perl5/site_perl/= 5.6.1/File/Spec.pm:/usr/ports/devel/p5-File-Spec /foobar/bin/perl5.6.1:/usr= /ports/lang/perl5: malformed entry: ind/Rule.pm:/usr/ports/devel/p5-File-Fi= nd-Rule /foobar/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/File/Spec.pm:/usr/ports/devel/p5-= File-Spec /foobar/bin/perl5.6.1:/usr/ports/lang/perl5| This may be because make_describe_pass1 is using 'make -j3' to try and optimize the build, and when I tried a similar trick with 'make index' on the weekend I also got this kind of corruption. I think it's happening because the child makes are occasionally overlapping their I/O, so the parent ends up with a corrupted list where two neighbouring entries are intertwined. Kris --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAFveJWry0BWjoQKURAvQ8AKC1xVQB1a1Bp29G/0c4ycylUte1dACgy2KL zUqkDwbM4ohADAfH8JsyoiU= =bMAM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 15:57:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15CD16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:57:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from postman.arcor.de (postman2.arcor-online.net [151.189.0.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06BA343D5E for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:57:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-51-21.reverse.qsc.de [212.202.51.21]) (authenticated bits=0)i0RNvUgG016998 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:57:31 +0100 (MET) Received: from [172.16.0.2] (helo=fillmore-labs.com) by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1Ald5G-000Dvp-HX; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:57:30 +0100 Message-ID: <4016FAEA.8010308@fillmore-labs.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:57:30 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH - http://www.fillmore-labs.com/ MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <20040127145518.33cd1648@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20040127234019.GA70137@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040127234019.GA70137@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Do we need a new major category (latex)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:57:34 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 02:55:18PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>ls -1 print/*latex* |wc -l >> 206 >> >>ls -1 */*latex* | wc -l >> 349 > > > That sounds like a good idea, except it should be called tex. > > Kris # ls -d print/*latex* | wc -l 19 # ls -d */*latex* | wc -l 36 # ls -d print/*tex* | wc -l 40 # ls -d */*tex* | wc -l 107 Otherwise you'll count files, CVS directories and empty lines. We have 'only' 216 ports in print... From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 16:43:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA42A16A4CE; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:43:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from postman.arcor.de (postman4.arcor-online.net [151.189.0.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9484443D78; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:43:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-51-21.reverse.qsc.de [212.202.51.21]) (authenticated bits=0)i0S0gDM4020996 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:42:14 +0100 (MET) Received: from [172.16.0.2] (helo=fillmore-labs.com) by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1AldmX-000Dyh-EY; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:42:13 +0100 Message-ID: <40170564.4050107@fillmore-labs.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:42:12 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH - http://www.fillmore-labs.com/ MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergei Kolobov References: <1075068827.93327.13.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20040127160204.GA704@chetwood.ru> In-Reply-To: <20040127160204.GA704@chetwood.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/49955: [PATCH] bsd.port.mk: add target to automatically install port documentation X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:43:50 -0000 Sergei Kolobov wrote: > To summarize: > > PORTDOCS dramatically reduces pkg-plist size in case > there are a lot of files and/or subdirs under DOCSDIR. > For example, PORTDOCS=*. > > My patch (let's call it DOCS) is for far more common scenario > (in my experience, at least) - there are just a few docs files > which could (and should) be listed explicitly. > > I just had an idea how this two approaches be combined into > single framework: > > Ports that have few doc files get this: > > DOCS= file1 file2 subdir/file3 this doesn't save you much compared with @cd ${WRKSRC}/doc && ${INSTALL_DATA} file1 file2 subdir/file3 ${DOCSDIR} it yould be interesting when this macro could copy hierarchies. Anyway, do you have a sample port the would benefit from a DOCS macro? I named to Java ports a examples (using javadoc, i.e. junit, java3d, forte, whatever) for the PORTDOCS macro, because - they have dynamically generated documentation, changing often - have a large, deep documentation tree - install the documentation themselves - don't always honour NOPORTDOCS so a good candidate for your patch would be a port with a large, deep documentation tree that isn't installed (bouncycastle). Or is your point that most people are too lazy to write PORTDOCS= NEWS Changelog .ifndef NOPORTDOCS @${MKDIR} ${DOCSDIR} @cd ${WRKSRC} && ${INSTALL_DATA} ${PORTDOCS} ${DOCSDIR} .endif but would use DOCSSRC= NEWS Changelog instead? And please avoid INSTALL_DOCS, it's too similar to INSTALL_MAN. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 16:46:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33BB16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:46:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta4.adelphia.net (mta4.adelphia.net [68.168.78.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688B943D76 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:46:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from parv_fm@mailsent.net) Received: from moo.holy.cow ([69.160.71.102]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040127235406.WZPS8989.mta13.adelphia.net@moo.holy.cow>; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 18:54:06 -0500 Received: by moo.holy.cow (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4CB45AD92; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 18:54:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 18:54:01 -0500 From: parv To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20040127235400.GA20878@moo.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Kris Kennaway , Alexander Leidinger , ports@freebsd.org References: <20040127145518.33cd1648@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20040127234019.GA70137@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040127234019.GA70137@xor.obsecurity.org> cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Alexander Leidinger Subject: Re: Do we need a new major category (latex)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:46:38 -0000 in message <20040127234019.GA70137@xor.obsecurity.org>, wrote Kris Kennaway thusly... > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 02:55:18PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > > ls -1 print/*latex* |wc -l > > 206 > > > > ls -1 */*latex* | wc -l > > 349 > > That sounds like a good idea, except it should be called tex. Make it so. :) That would actually be lovely. - Parv -- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 17:42:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D3216A4CE; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:42:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.eos.ocn.ne.jp (eos.ocn.ne.jp [211.6.83.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C6A43D48; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:42:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from delta.allbsd.org (p56147-adsao12honb4-acca.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp [220.96.138.147]) by smtp.eos.ocn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA591DB; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:42:33 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (alph.allbsd.org [192.168.0.10]) by delta.allbsd.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0S1g5A2022277; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:42:07 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:41:33 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20040128.104133.21682970.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> To: jwimb@patmedia.net, jwb@homer.att.com From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: <4016D260.1060803@patmedia.net> References: <4016D260.1060803@patmedia.net> X-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-Mailer: Mew version 4.0.62 on Emacs 21.3.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Wed_Jan_28_10_41_33_2004_532)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: hrs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: docbook-xml-4.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:42:42 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Wed_Jan_28_10_41_33_2004_532)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit James Ballantine wrote in <4016D260.1060803@patmedia.net>: jwimb> CATALOG "/usr/local/share/xml/docbook/4.2/docbook/cat" jwimb> in /usr/local/share.catalog manually and reinstall docbook-xml. Grr, what I wanted to mean are "/usr/local/share/sgml/catalog.ports" and "/usr/local/share/xml/catalog.ports", not "/usr/local/share.catalog". jwimb> Is there a port that I can deinstall that will remove all the docbook ports jwimb> so I can start from ground zero again? The cause is that /usr/local/share/{sgml,xml}/catalog.ports already contains lines that the port tries to register. So removing lines in catalog.ports can eliminate the error. That is, James Ballantine wrote in <4016D260.1060803@patmedia.net>: jwimb> # pwd jwimb> /usr/local/share/sgml jwimb> # ls jwimb> catalog docbook linuxdoc tmac jwimb> catalog.ports iso8879 otranspec transpec jwimb> # cat catalog jwimb> -- Created by xmlcatmgr-2.0alpha2 -- jwimb> CATALOG "catalog.ports" Look into "catalog.ports" file instead. You can see lines related to docbook which are reported in the error message. Or, you can "make install" once you rewrite lines in /usr/ports/textproc/docbook-xml/Makefile: post-install: @${XMLCATMGR} -sc ${CATALOG_PORTS_SGML} add CATALOG ${DOCBOOKDIR}/docbook.cat @${XMLCATMGR} -c ${CATALOG_PORTS_XML} add nextCatalog ${DOCBOOKDIR}/catalog.xml with: post-install: -@${XMLCATMGR} -sc ${CATALOG_PORTS_SGML} add CATALOG ${DOCBOOKDIR}/docbook.cat -@${XMLCATMGR} -c ${CATALOG_PORTS_XML} add nextCatalog ${DOCBOOKDIR}/catalog.xml -- | Hiroki SATO ----Security_Multipart(Wed_Jan_28_10_41_33_2004_532)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAFxNNTyzT2CeTzy0RAs6gAJ0WqyHxvR5hHkKwbvStzCmSVirWLwCfarUw r5GtoYFs6KDkQDvwepZXPXE= =DtG5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Wed_Jan_28_10_41_33_2004_532)---- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 17:44:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F216E16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:44:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from dns13.mail.yahoo.co.jp (dns13.mail.yahoo.co.jp [210.81.151.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7E6443D5F for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:44:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ayakokiko@ybb.ne.jp) Received: from unknown (HELO gorgon.near.this) (219.11.234.11 with poptime) by dns13.mail.yahoo.co.jp with SMTP; 28 Jan 2004 01:44:34 -0000 X-Apparently-From: Received: from ghost.near.this (ghost.near.this [10.0.3.9]) by gorgon.near.this (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18C97F81; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:44:29 +0900 (JST) Received: by ghost.near.this (Postfix, from userid 100) id C917B1932C; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:44:27 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:44:16 +0900 From: horio shoichi To: peepstein@canada.com In-Reply-To: <200401262331.56417.peepstein@canada.com> References: <200401262331.56417.peepstein@canada.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20040128.014427.264fb4c704ac363f.10.0.3.9@bugsgrief.net> cc: magick-developers@imagemagick.org cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ImageMagick Checksum Mismatch. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:45:00 -0000 On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 23:31:56 -0800 Edward Epstein wrote: > I'm trying to upgrade graphics/ImageMagick, but it seems that there is a > checksum mismatch with the ImageMagick-5.5.7-15.tar.bz2 file. > > Can someone please let me know if there is a legitimate reason for this? > > Here is what I assume to be the pertinent information: > > Timestamp from ImageMagick Makefile: > $FreeBSD: ports/graphics/ImageMagick/Makefile,v 1.176 2004/01/21 06:57:29 nork > Exp $ > > md5 checksum from ImageMagick distinfo file: > MD5 (ImageMagick-5.5.7-15.tar.bz2) = 80144cc67bb9888b26f9704362269487 > > md5 checksum from ImageMagick source file downloaded from > ftp.imagemagick.org/pub/ImageMagick: > MD5 (ImageMagick-5.5.7-15.tar.bz2) = 6780f81dee32f1e8d2f277b6fe621955 > > I've re-downloaded the file multiple times from the site, just in case there > was a problem with the download. Also, I've pulled the same file from some > mirrors and noticed that the checksums from the mirrors match the checksum > from the official imagemagick.org ftp site, not the checksum in the distinfo > file (which makes sense if the mirrors pull the file automagically from the > main site). > > Also, to magick-developers@, I am not subscribed so please make sure to CC me > if you reply to this message. > > Regards, > Ed > > > -- > > "There are people who cheat on their spouse but not at cards, and vice versa, > and both and neither. Reputation is not necessarily portable from one > situation to another, and it's not easily expressed." > --Clay Shirkey. (http://www.shirky.com/writings/group_enemy.html) > > "It has been said that man is a rational animal. All my life I have > been searching for evidence which could support this." > --Bertrand Russell. > > "The American empire is ideological, not territorial. We are the most > ideological people in the world, and we are so united in our view that we > don't understand there can be other views." > --Lt. Gen. William Odom, ret. (Former Director of NSA). > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Same here. I checked a few sites, and found http://imagemagick.sourceforge.net/ has the .bz2 file with matching md5 value. Note all the "wrong' files from all the other places have the same contents as .gz file from http://www.ImageMagick.org/ where I cound not find .bz2 file. horio shoichi From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 20:10:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4988A16A4CE; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 20:10:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from doom.homeunix.org (8-107.dialup.comset.net [213.172.8.107]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7E143D60; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 20:10:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from igor@doom.homeunix.org) Received: from doom.homeunix.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by doom.homeunix.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0S4AHF2000760; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 07:10:24 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from igor@doom.homeunix.org) Received: (from igor@localhost) by doom.homeunix.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0S4ABTN000759; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 07:10:11 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from igor) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 07:10:11 +0300 From: Igor Pokrovsky To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20040128041011.GA740@doom.homeunix.org> References: <20040127120003.GA8184@doom.homeunix.org> <20040127213439.GB68505@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040127213439.GB68505@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: ijliao@freebsd.org Subject: Re: graphics/aqsis problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 04:10:37 -0000 On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 01:34:39PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 03:00:03PM +0300, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm going to update port graphics/ayam to use aqsis as it's renderer. > > However when I'm trying to compile any sample shader with aqsl, it > > hangs. I've got a backtrace after interrupting aqsl: > > > > #0 0x282bd660 in __sys_poll () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4 > > #1 0x282bcb45 in _thread_kern_sched_state_unlock () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4 > > #2 0x282bc4fa in _thread_kern_scheduler () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4 > > #3 0x0 in ?? () > > > > So I'm unable to update graphics/ayam until the problem with aqsis persists. > > Have you reported this bug to the developers? I was not sure if it is aqsis bug or FreeBSD incompatibility problem, so I haven't yet. I will send them report now. -ip -- Everything is contagious. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 21:16:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7F316A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 21:16:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from spam2.snu.ac.kr (spam2.snu.ac.kr [147.46.10.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A73543D58 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 21:16:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nospam@users.sourceforge.net) Received: (snipe 29374 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2004 14:15:58 +0900(KST) Received: from nospam@users.sourceforge.net with SpamSniper2.76 (Processed in 0.013520 secs); Received: from unknown (HELO sis1.snu.ac.kr) (147.46.10.36) by 0 with SMTP; 28 Jan 2004 14:15:58 +0900(KST) X-RCPTTO: ports@FreeBSD.org,gnome@FreeBSD.org, Received: from users.sourceforge.net ([147.46.44.183]) by sis1.snu.ac.kr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0S5CvHO112386; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:12:58 +0900 Message-ID: <40174592.2090809@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:16:02 +0900 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040119 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: gnomevfs2-2.4.1_1 fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 05:16:04 -0000 This port fails here: (FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE) [ ...snip... ] creating libmoniker_gnome_vfs_std.la (cd .libs && rm -f libmoniker_gnome_vfs_std.la && ln -sf ../libmoniker_gnome_vfs_std.la libmoniker_gnome_vfs_std.la) sed -e "s|\@MONIKER_LIBDIR\@|/usr/X11R6/lib/bonobo/monikers|" \ ./GNOME_VFS_Moniker_std.server.in.in \ > GNOME_VFS_Moniker_std.server.in LC_ALL=C ../intltool-merge ../po GNOME_VFS_Moniker_std.server.in GNOME_VFS_Moniker_std.server -o -u -c ../po/.intltool-merge-cache Not enough arguments for mkdir at ../intltool-merge line 999, near "$lang or" Execution of ../intltool-merge aborted due to compilation errors. gmake[2]: *** [GNOME_VFS_Moniker_std.server] Error 255 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/gnomevfs2/work/gnome-vfs-2.4.2/monikers' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/gnomevfs2/work/gnome-vfs-2.4.2' gmake: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Regards, Rob. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 21:30:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8AD816A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 21:30:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from straycat.dhs.org (h0050da134090.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.91.148.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6F2943D48 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 21:30:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tmclaugh@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: (qmail 27169 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2004 05:31:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.128?) (192.168.1.128) by 192.168.1.132 with SMTP; 28 Jan 2004 05:31:32 -0000 From: Tom McLaughlin To: Rob In-Reply-To: <40174592.2090809@users.sourceforge.net> References: <40174592.2090809@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1075268045.47724.4.camel@compass> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:34:05 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Gnome cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: gnomevfs2-2.4.1_1 fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 05:30:37 -0000 On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 00:16, Rob wrote: > This port fails here: > (FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE) > > [ ...snip... ] > creating libmoniker_gnome_vfs_std.la > (cd .libs && rm -f libmoniker_gnome_vfs_std.la && ln -sf ../libmoniker_gnome_vfs_std.la libmoniker_gnome_vfs_std.la) > sed -e "s|\@MONIKER_LIBDIR\@|/usr/X11R6/lib/bonobo/monikers|" \ > ./GNOME_VFS_Moniker_std.server.in.in \ > > GNOME_VFS_Moniker_std.server.in > LC_ALL=C ../intltool-merge ../po GNOME_VFS_Moniker_std.server.in GNOME_VFS_Moniker_std.server -o -u -c ../po/.intltool-merge-cache > Not enough arguments for mkdir at ../intltool-merge line 999, near "$lang or" > Execution of ../intltool-merge aborted due to compilation errors. > gmake[2]: *** [GNOME_VFS_Moniker_std.server] Error 255 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/gnomevfs2/work/gnome-vfs-2.4.2/monikers' > gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/gnomevfs2/work/gnome-vfs-2.4.2' > gmake: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 > *** Error code 2 > > > Regards, > Rob. Hi Rob, it looks like it's been taken care of now. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=62009 Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 00:57:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00B416A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:57:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mignon.ki.iif.hu (mignon.ki.niif.hu [193.6.222.240]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E07C343D1D for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:57:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mohacsi@niif.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mignon.ki.iif.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FDD57E3; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:57:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from mignon.ki.iif.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mignon.ki.iif.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07395-01-3; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:57:19 +0100 (CET) Received: by mignon.ki.iif.hu (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 6E99657E1; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:57:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mignon.ki.iif.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C63C57DE; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:57:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:57:19 +0100 (CET) From: Mohacsi Janos X-X-Sender: mohacsi@mignon.ki.iif.hu To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20040127213401.GA68505@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20040128094601.J90334@mignon.ki.iif.hu> References: <20040127112304.C48022@mignon.ki.iif.hu> <20040127213401.GA68505@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question: maintaining patch separately from ports cvs X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 08:57:32 -0000 On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:39:13AM +0100, Mohacsi Janos wrote: > > Dear All, > > Are there any possible way to maintain a local patch against a > > certain port. > > Let's consider a following scenario: > > - There is port named foo/bar that is maintained and constantly updated by > > the certain maintainer of FreeBSD foo/bar port. > > - Somebody wants to use the port, but a heavily modified way e.g.: > > patched setup in chroot, jail environment, setup with certain > > configuration defaults, that is extremely local specific > > > > How can one achieve such scenario without interfering the FreeBSD port > > system and benefiting the regular update of the port? > > Use cvs to check out and update your ports tree - see the handbook for > documentation. Are you referring to the AnonCVS section? http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/anoncvs.html There no way to maintain a local only files with CVSUP mirroring? Like foo/bar/files/patch-local1 ? How can I save from being overwritten by the cvsup mirror? Thanks, Janos Mohacsi From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 01:12:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92D816A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:12:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-119-53-122.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4835743D39 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:12:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E133266E35; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:12:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:12:17 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Mohacsi Janos Message-ID: <20040128091217.GA76469@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040127112304.C48022@mignon.ki.iif.hu> <20040127213401.GA68505@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040128094601.J90334@mignon.ki.iif.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040128094601.J90334@mignon.ki.iif.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: question: maintaining patch separately from ports cvs X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:12:33 -0000 --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:57:19AM +0100, Mohacsi Janos wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:39:13AM +0100, Mohacsi Janos wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > Are there any possible way to maintain a local patch against a > > > certain port. > > > Let's consider a following scenario: > > > - There is port named foo/bar that is maintained and constantly updat= ed by > > > the certain maintainer of FreeBSD foo/bar port. > > > - Somebody wants to use the port, but a heavily modified way e.g.: > > > patched setup in chroot, jail environment, setup with certain > > > configuration defaults, that is extremely local specific > > > > > > How can one achieve such scenario without interfering the FreeBSD port > > > system and benefiting the regular update of the port? > > > > Use cvs to check out and update your ports tree - see the handbook for > > documentation. >=20 > Are you referring to the AnonCVS section? > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/anoncvs.html >=20 > There no way to maintain a local only files with CVSUP mirroring? What most developers do is cvsup the entire CVS repository and check it out locally. > Like foo/bar/files/patch-local1 ? How can I save from being overwritten by > the cvsup mirror? Apparently you can do it with a "local branch" (documented in the handbook and/or CVSup FAQ), but I don't know if many people do that, or how difficult and impractical it is to use. Kris --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAF3zxWry0BWjoQKURAm7vAKDHsINdY55sV7OIZSbLKtxZ98QkoACfSbJB xiVzehnNj/5YwlqVIy5Oe+0= =YbVy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 03:18:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8052016A4F7; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 03:18:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from tl.kom.tuwien.ac.at (tl.kom.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.34.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACCB43D1F; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 03:18:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from arved@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tl.kom.tuwien.ac.at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tl.kom.tuwien.ac.at (8.12.11/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i0SBIN5p014934; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:18:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from arved@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from tilman@localhost) by tl.kom.tuwien.ac.at (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0SBIMY1014933; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:18:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from arved@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: tl.kom.tuwien.ac.at: tilman set sender to arved@FreeBSD.org using -f From: Tilman Linneweh To: ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-qcJdhMhJpppV5kA937Du" Organization: FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <1075288701.22414.13.camel@tl.kom.tuwien.ac.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:18:21 +0100 cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org cc: krion@FreeBSD.org cc: sergei@FreeBSD.org cc: lofi@FreeBSD.org Subject: libgcrypt update X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:18:28 -0000 --=-qcJdhMhJpppV5kA937Du Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, You are receiving this email, because you are listed as a maintainer of a port, that depends on security/libgcrypt.=20 I was asked to update libgcrypt to 1.1.90 because security/vpnc need the new features. (see patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~arved/stuff/libgcrypt.diff ) Unfortunately, the new version is not compatible, so I am going to ask for a repocopy for libgcrypt-devel.=20 I would like to get feedback, which ports already support the new version. So If your port (or a new version of it) builds with the new libgcrypt, please reply. regards arved=20 --=-qcJdhMhJpppV5kA937Du Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAF5p9fCLDn4B6xToRAleLAJoC30TaI3CRwRVFOi/GNqFszfjWAQCggWH+ wik1fnGLlkb+M6ATfKYmnN8= =t2qb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-qcJdhMhJpppV5kA937Du-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 03:35:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C85216A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 03:35:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout01.sul.t-online.com (mailout01.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F8643D6D for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 03:34:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from fwd07.aul.t-online.de by mailout01.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1AlnyD-0002iq-04; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:34:57 +0100 Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (XdRdDTZUQeugBV26gpbCcdAJjAE023FsbxGL-glAD-rI-q+gcBahE5@[217.229.219.154]) by fmrl07.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1Alnxy-1hyhdo0; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:34:42 +0100 Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) i0SBYfJb086422; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:34:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (netchild@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0SBYemX002840; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:34:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:34:40 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Oliver Eikemeier Message-Id: <20040128123440.2e0e1389@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <4016FAEA.8010308@fillmore-labs.com> References: <20040127145518.33cd1648@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20040127234019.GA70137@xor.obsecurity.org> <4016FAEA.8010308@fillmore-labs.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Seen: false X-ID: XdRdDTZUQeugBV26gpbCcdAJjAE023FsbxGL-glAD-rI-q+gcBahE5@t-dialin.net cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Do we need a new major category (latex)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:35:29 -0000 On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:57:30 +0100 Oliver Eikemeier wrote: [ls -1 vs. ls -d] > Otherwise you'll count files, CVS directories and empty lines. We have > 'only' 216 ports in print... Argh... yes. I make this error _every_ time. In case I want to see the files I notice it immediately, but in this case I just piped the output into wc without looking at the output. The benchmark category has 30 entries (ls /usr/ports/benchmarks | grep -vE '(pkg|CVS|Makefile)' |wc -l) and there are 42 packages with latex in the name (ls -d */*latex*| grep -vE '(pkg|CVS|Makefile)' |wc -l), and 36 additional portnames with "tex" but without "text" (yes, this excludes texproc: ls -d */*tex*| grep -vE '(pkg|CVS|Makefile|text)' |wc -l), so I think this is still a good idea (we don't have teTeX and similar ports in this listing). Bye, Alexander. -- I will be available to get hired in April 2004. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 04:10:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BCB216A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 04:10:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from postoffice.e-easy.com.au (eth0.lnk.aims.net.au [203.31.73.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527B343D39 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 04:10:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@e-easy.com.au) Received: from e-easy.com.au (eet03s01.aims.private [192.168.10.3]) by postoffice.e-easy.com.au with ESMTP id i0SCAQGg038136 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 23:10:26 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from chris@e-easy.com.au) Message-Id: <200401281210.i0SCAQGg038136@postoffice.e-easy.com.au> Received: from eet03s01 by e-easy.com.au (e-easy.com.au) (MDaemon.PRO.v7.0.0t.R) with ESMTP id md50000075334.msg for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 22:40:06 +1100 From: "Chris Knight" To: "'Kris Kennaway'" , "'Mohacsi Janos'" Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 22:40:03 +1100 Organization: E-Easy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <20040128091217.GA76469@xor.obsecurity.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0 Thread-Index: AcPlfv0DPcLM0XA0Q+aTHTw1aFbBzwAEQUOw X-Spam-Processed: e-easy.com.au, Wed, 28 Jan 2004 22:40:06 +1100 (not processed: spam filter disabled) X-Return-Path: chris@e-easy.com.au X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: RE: question: maintaining patch separately from ports cvs X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: chris@e-easy.com.au List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:10:43 -0000 Howdy, > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org On Behalf Of Kris Kennaway > Sent: Wednesday, 28 January 2004 20:12 > To: Mohacsi Janos > Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Kris Kennaway > Subject: Re: question: maintaining patch separately from ports cvs > > [snip] > > Like foo/bar/files/patch-local1 ? How can I save from being > > overwritten by the cvsup mirror? > > Apparently you can do it with a "local branch" (documented in > the handbook and/or CVSup FAQ), but I don't know if many > people do that, or how difficult and impractical it is to use. > "local branches" are OK when the size and frequency of the merges is fairly low. Once the frequency increases, you're probably better off to do regular imports of ports-all or of the individual ports for which you have local mods for into your own repository. And there's always perforce, which apparently makes this type of process far easier. I've yet to tinker with perforce though. Local branches are a bit of fun to set up. You also then have to ensure your cvsup updates are done with -L 2 and watch the logs for any Fixups or Replaces on the repo files for which you have a local branch. You'll then need to check your branch changes in these files and reapply them if necessary from your backups. I have some docs on setting up local branches. I really should get around to submitting it as a DocBook article. Feel free to ask me for a copy if you want give this a try. Regards, Chris Knight Systems Administrator E-Easy Tel: +61 3 6334 9995 Fax: +61 3 6331 7032 Mob: +61 419 528 795 Web: http://www.e-easy.com.au From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 04:46:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14AE816A4CE; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 04:46:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from blues.jpj.net (blues.jpj.net [208.210.80.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE7B43D1D; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 04:46:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from trevor@jpj.net) Received: from blues.jpj.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blues.jpj.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0SCkirr054353; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 07:46:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from trevor@jpj.net) Received: from localhost (trevor@localhost)i0SCkilc054350; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 07:46:44 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: blues.jpj.net: trevor owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 07:46:44 -0500 (EST) From: Trevor Johnson To: Kirill Ponomarew In-Reply-To: <20040123223812.GE84157@voodoo.oberon.net> Message-ID: <20040128073442.W62139@blues.jpj.net> References: <20040123170901.D40401@blues.jpj.net> <20040123223812.GE84157@voodoo.oberon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: gettext X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:46:38 -0000 Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > Why did you create this *-old *-new versions and not just > updated gettext and bumped PORTREVISIONs for depended ports ? The gettext-new idea is Jeremy Messenger's and it hasn't been implemented. I figured that keeping gettext 0.12.1 available and having all ports still use it would be the least disruptive thing, but I was wrong. Sorry. -- Trevor Johnson From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 04:48:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA8B16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 04:48:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from postman.arcor.de (postman1.arcor-online.net [151.189.0.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A5B43D31 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 04:48:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-51-21.reverse.qsc.de [212.202.51.21]) (authenticated bits=0)i0SCmbu9023949 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:48:37 +0100 (MET) Received: from [172.16.0.2] (helo=fillmore-labs.com) by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1Alp7V-000Elz-44; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:48:37 +0100 Message-ID: <4017AFA4.4090801@fillmore-labs.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:48:36 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH - http://www.fillmore-labs.com/ MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <20040127145518.33cd1648@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20040127234019.GA70137@xor.obsecurity.org> <4016FAEA.8010308@fillmore-labs.com> <20040128123440.2e0e1389@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20040128123440.2e0e1389@Magellan.Leidinger.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do we need a new major category (latex)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:48:42 -0000 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:57:30 +0100 > Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > > [ls -1 vs. ls -d] > >>Otherwise you'll count files, CVS directories and empty lines. We have >>'only' 216 ports in print... > > Argh... yes. I make this error _every_ time. In case I want to see the > files I notice it immediately, but in this case I just piped the output > into wc without looking at the output. > > The benchmark category has 30 entries (ls /usr/ports/benchmarks | grep > -vE '(pkg|CVS|Makefile)' |wc -l) This is true, but no LaTeX benchmarks... and there are 42 packages with latex in > the name (ls -d */*latex*| grep -vE '(pkg|CVS|Makefile)' |wc -l), You don't need the grep here, since pkg|CVS|Makefile doesn't match *latex*, and you may want to count mylatexpkg. > and 36 > additional portnames with "tex" but without "text" (yes, this excludes > texproc: ls -d */*tex*| grep -vE '(pkg|CVS|Makefile|text)' |wc -l), the problem with all that number games is that I get distfiles/latex_[...].tar.gz in ls -d */*latex*. May I suggest: awk -F\| ' \ BEGIN {IGNORECASE=1} \ $1 ~ /(La|te)TeX|TeX[^ti]/ \ ' INDEX | wc -l > so I think this is still a good idea (we don't have teTeX and similar ports > in this listing). I never questioned the fact that a TeX category would be a good thing, only your data is weird. As a sign of conciliation I send you a semi-automated patch: awk -F\| ' \ BEGIN {IGNORECASE=1} \ $1 ~ /(La|te)TeX|TeX[^ti]/ {print $2 "/Makefile"} \ ' INDEX | xargs sed -i ".orig" -e 's/^CATEGORIES.*$/& tex/' Have fun Oliver From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 04:51:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2517716A4CE; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 04:51:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from voodoo.oberon.net (voodoo.oberon.net [212.118.165.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095C643D31; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 04:51:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net) Received: from krion by voodoo.oberon.net with local (Exim 4.30) id 1AlpA1-0005Wk-EV; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:51:13 +0100 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:51:13 +0100 From: Kirill Ponomarew To: Trevor Johnson Message-ID: <20040128125113.GA20343@voodoo.oberon.net> Mail-Followup-To: Kirill Ponomarew , Trevor Johnson , ports@FreeBSD.org, questions@FreeBSD.org References: <20040123170901.D40401@blues.jpj.net> <20040123223812.GE84157@voodoo.oberon.net> <20040128073442.W62139@blues.jpj.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gKMricLos+KVdGMg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040128073442.W62139@blues.jpj.net> X-NCC-Regid: de.oberon Sender: Kirill Ponomarew cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: gettext X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:51:15 -0000 --gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 07:46:44AM -0500, Trevor Johnson wrote: =20 > > Why did you create this *-old *-new versions and not just > > updated gettext and bumped PORTREVISIONs for depended ports ? >=20 > The gettext-new idea is Jeremy Messenger's and it hasn't been implemented. >=20 > I figured that keeping gettext 0.12.1 available and having all ports still > use it would be the least disruptive thing, but I was wrong. Sorry. You did really good job, Trevor, by creating ports/61992, it's the most simple way to update depended ports, IMO. -Kirill --gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAF7BBQC1G6a60JuURAkKpAKCZdnkkibtA41TIOKOZmmeTNEq1tQCeK7ns ms+DEq6d7G55Zb4JKcSJZ2I= =5Jny -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gKMricLos+KVdGMg-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 04:55:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A002816A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 04:55:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from outpost.globcon.net (outpost.globcon.net [62.141.88.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A027743D4C for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 04:55:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sergei@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 51706 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2004 12:55:51 -0000 Received: from agdcgw01.akingump.com (HELO kolobov.com) (12.40.174.2) by outpost.globcon.net (62.141.88.161) with SMTP; 28 Jan 2004 12:55:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 13616 invoked by uid 911); 28 Jan 2004 12:55:22 -0000 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:55:22 +0300 From: Sergei Kolobov To: Tilman Linneweh Message-ID: <20040128125522.GA697@chetwood.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Tilman Linneweh , ports@FreeBSD.org, krion@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org, lofi@FreeBSD.org References: <1075288701.22414.13.camel@tl.kom.tuwien.ac.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1075288701.22414.13.camel@tl.kom.tuwien.ac.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org cc: krion@FreeBSD.org cc: lofi@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: libgcrypt update X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:55:59 -0000 --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On 2004-01-28 at 12:18 +0100, Tilman Linneweh wrote: > You are receiving this email, because you are listed as a maintainer of > a port, that depends on security/libgcrypt.=20 >=20 > I was asked to update libgcrypt to 1.1.90 because security/vpnc need the > new features. > (see patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~arved/stuff/libgcrypt.diff ) >=20 > Unfortunately, the new version is not compatible, so I am going to ask > for a repocopy for libgcrypt-devel.=20 >=20 > I would like to get feedback, which ports already support the new > version. So If your port (or a new version of it) builds with the new > libgcrypt, please reply. Actually, I have put gnutls-devel port on hold because it *requires* libgcrypt 1.1.43+. I'm not sure how backwards-compatible libgcrypt is, but libgcrypt-devel certainly has my vote. Sergei --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAF7E6FOxuaTulNAERAnArAJ4yc6DXNrinkidMz2saUFebxtsOPACeO2PA 3beVJgai0IK0pRWitnhZ72k= =NKy9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 04:59:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73EEE16A4CE; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 04:59:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from voodoo.oberon.net (voodoo.oberon.net [212.118.165.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D17143D1D; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 04:59:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net) Received: from krion by voodoo.oberon.net with local (Exim 4.30) id 1AlpHf-0005Zz-ND; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:59:07 +0100 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:59:07 +0100 From: Kirill Ponomarew To: Tilman Linneweh Message-ID: <20040128125907.GC20343@voodoo.oberon.net> Mail-Followup-To: Kirill Ponomarew , Tilman Linneweh , ports@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org, lofi@FreeBSD.org, sergei@FreeBSD.org References: <1075288701.22414.13.camel@tl.kom.tuwien.ac.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1075288701.22414.13.camel@tl.kom.tuwien.ac.at> X-NCC-Regid: de.oberon Sender: Kirill Ponomarew cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org cc: sergei@FreeBSD.org cc: lofi@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: libgcrypt update X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:59:09 -0000 --tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 12:18:21PM +0100, Tilman Linneweh wrote: =20 > You are receiving this email, because you are listed as a maintainer of > a port, that depends on security/libgcrypt.=20 >=20 > I was asked to update libgcrypt to 1.1.90 because security/vpnc need the > new features. > (see patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~arved/stuff/libgcrypt.diff ) >=20 > Unfortunately, the new version is not compatible, so I am going to ask > for a repocopy for libgcrypt-devel.=20 >=20 > I would like to get feedback, which ports already support the new > version. So If your port (or a new version of it) builds with the new > libgcrypt, please reply. repocopy seems to be a good solution for this problem. -Kirill --tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAF7IbQC1G6a60JuURAn5sAJ4sTswwNnh8VGWOUPatEofFak0cuQCfZLyJ ms6EIHRWNA9oeo6LgK9Jiog= =BeEx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 05:26:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECCD516A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 05:26:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from outpost.globcon.net (outpost.globcon.net [62.141.88.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6CABE43D2F for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 05:26:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sergei@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 52391 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2004 13:26:28 -0000 Received: from agdcgw01.akingump.com (HELO kolobov.com) (12.40.174.2) by outpost.globcon.net (62.141.88.161) with SMTP; 28 Jan 2004 13:26:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 13709 invoked by uid 911); 28 Jan 2004 13:25:57 -0000 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:25:57 +0300 From: Sergei Kolobov To: Oliver Eikemeier Message-ID: <20040128132557.GB697@chetwood.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Oliver Eikemeier , freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20040127160204.GA704@chetwood.ru> <40170564.4050107@fillmore-labs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40170564.4050107@fillmore-labs.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/49955: [PATCH] bsd.port.mk: add target to automatically install port documentation X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:26:34 -0000 On 2004-01-28 at 01:42 +0100, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > Sergei Kolobov wrote: > >Ports that have few doc files get this: > > > >DOCS= file1 file2 subdir/file3 > > this doesn't save you much compared with > > @cd ${WRKSRC}/doc && ${INSTALL_DATA} file1 file2 subdir/file3 > ${DOCSDIR} Yes, that's what it is, essentially - with @${MKDIR} ${DOCSDIR}, all wrapped in .if !defined(NOPORTDOCS). If you find it stupid (or lazy) to add support for this in bsd.port.mk, here's my experience: most of the 50+ ports I maintain personally, plus many other ports I've touched recently have this construct. I have also converted several ports to this construct in a process of updating, etc. Moreover, the only purpose of post-install target in some of those ports is to install docs, so the whole target is wrapped in .if !defined(NOPORTDOCS). Most of this ports have static DOCS lists - e.g., AUTHORS NEWS README TODO - and just a few have occassional *.html (or similar) glob, but none of them need to copy tons of files into DOCSDIR or create a directory structure under DOCSDIR. > it yould be interesting when this macro could copy hierarchies. > Anyway, do you have a sample port the would benefit from a DOCS macro? > I named to Java ports a examples (using javadoc, i.e. junit, java3d, > forte, whatever) for the PORTDOCS macro, because > > - they have dynamically generated documentation, changing often > - have a large, deep documentation tree > - install the documentation themselves > - don't always honour NOPORTDOCS No, I don't disagree with that. In fact, I see the need for that. All I'm saying is most of the ports I deal with are completely different in this regard. > Or is your point that most people are too lazy to write > > PORTDOCS= NEWS Changelog > > .ifndef NOPORTDOCS > @${MKDIR} ${DOCSDIR} > @cd ${WRKSRC} && ${INSTALL_DATA} ${PORTDOCS} ${DOCSDIR} > .endif > > but would use > > DOCSSRC= NEWS Changelog > > instead? Essentially, yes. It's not about laziness ;) but about convenience, and shortening a lot of port Makefiles. I, for one, would like to see that. ;) > And please avoid INSTALL_DOCS, it's too similar to INSTALL_MAN. Yes, the original version I've submitted in the PR had this bad naming choice. I have setlled on DOCS name since then. Again, as I mentioned in my previous message, I would like to see two separate variables: - DOCS: pretty much static list, allows some simple wildcards, one dir level only - DOCS_GLOB: dynamically generated list, uses full power of allows liberal use of wildcards, can copy directory hierarchy. This is your PORTDOCS today. and corresponding USE_DOCS to specify whether you need to install the docs automatically into DOCSDIR, or just add them to pkg-plist if NOPORTDOCS is not set, or both. Sergei From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 05:27:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3D016A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 05:27:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout06.sul.t-online.com (mailout06.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40AEF43D2D for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 05:27:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from fwd03.aul.t-online.de by mailout06.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1Alpih-0004C0-00; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:27:03 +0100 Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (bVgYeQZDQe5a3XeeoeQry+P-NCOXMuCPjPURQoe3Z-4jYFAjk4qNYb@[217.229.219.154]) by fmrl03.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1AlpiR-0xyJKC0; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:26:47 +0100 Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) i0SDQkJb002410; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:26:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (netchild@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0SDQkmX017245; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:26:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:26:46 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Oliver Eikemeier Message-Id: <20040128142646.1542ee19@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <4017AFA4.4090801@fillmore-labs.com> References: <20040127145518.33cd1648@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20040127234019.GA70137@xor.obsecurity.org> <4016FAEA.8010308@fillmore-labs.com> <20040128123440.2e0e1389@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <4017AFA4.4090801@fillmore-labs.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Seen: false X-ID: bVgYeQZDQe5a3XeeoeQry+P-NCOXMuCPjPURQoe3Z-4jYFAjk4qNYb@t-dialin.net cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do we need a new major category (latex)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:27:12 -0000 On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:48:36 +0100 Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:57:30 +0100 > > Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > > > > [ls -1 vs. ls -d] > > > >>Otherwise you'll count files, CVS directories and empty lines. We have > >>'only' 216 ports in print... > > > > Argh... yes. I make this error _every_ time. In case I want to see the > > files I notice it immediately, but in this case I just piped the output > > into wc without looking at the output. > > > > The benchmark category has 30 entries (ls /usr/ports/benchmarks | grep > > -vE '(pkg|CVS|Makefile)' |wc -l) > This is true, but no LaTeX benchmarks... Yes, it was just an example of a major category with less ports than tex-ports. > and there are 42 packages with latex in > > the name (ls -d */*latex*| grep -vE '(pkg|CVS|Makefile)' |wc -l), > You don't need the grep here, since pkg|CVS|Makefile doesn't match > *latex*, and you may want to count mylatexpkg. I just used the history of the shell, nothing more happened here. But I've tested it before sending the last mail, I've checked for pkg and CVS after getting the count with wc like this: ---snip--- % ls -d /usr/ports/*/*tex* | grep pkg ---snip--- > > and 36 > > additional portnames with "tex" but without "text" (yes, this excludes > > texproc: ls -d */*tex*| grep -vE '(pkg|CVS|Makefile|text)' |wc -l), > the problem with all that number games is that I get > distfiles/latex_[...].tar.gz ---snip--- % ll /usr/ports/distfiles/*latex* zsh: no matches found: /usr/ports/distfiles/*latex* % ll /usr/ports/distfiles/*tex* -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5.5M 27 Mai 2003 /usr/ports/distfiles/gettext-0.12.1.tar.gz % ll /usr/ports/distfiles/*tex* | grep -vE '(pkg|CVS|Makefile|text)' ---snip--- > in ls -d */*latex*. May I suggest: > > awk -F\| ' \ > BEGIN {IGNORECASE=1} \ > $1 ~ /(La|te)TeX|TeX[^ti]/ \ > ' INDEX | wc -l > > > so I think this is still a good idea (we don't have teTeX and similar ports > > in this listing). > > I never questioned the fact that a TeX category would be a good thing, only > your data is weird. As a sign of conciliation I send you a semi-automated patch: I've tested it more before I hit the send key in the last mail. It wasn't meant to be a general way to determine the exact number of ports. I've just used some commands which work on _my_ system and as I was lazy I just pasted parts of my shell session. I don't think we need to discuss this further, the important part (creating a new major category) is in the hands of kris/portmgr. Bye, Alexander. -- I will be available to get hired in April 2004. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 06:13:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D126416A4DD for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 06:13:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mxsf15.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf15.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B333243D3F for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 06:13:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from webmaster@studentchess.org) Received: from studentchess.org (66-214-198-56.ata-cres.charterpipeline.net [66.214.198.56])i0SEB8bN076123 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:11:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from webmaster@studentchess.org) Message-ID: <4017C1A4.9080501@studentchess.org> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 06:05:24 -0800 From: "webmaster@studentchess.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: WebMin X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: webmaster@studentchess.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:13:20 -0000 Hello, I am using freebsd on my server. It is version 4.8. I currently am trying install the port webmin however it seems to be stuck in some kind of continuous loop of some sort. It is also giving me a warning about perl not being installed. Should I install Perl first before installing WebMin? Thanks, Dennis From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 06:15:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92C016A4FE for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 06:15:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (mail.dt.E-Technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE [129.217.163.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BCDA43D2F for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 06:15:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de) Received: from m2a2.dyndns.org (krusty.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.163.1])B34241B4F6 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:15:21 +0100 (CET) Received: by merlin.emma.line.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 21B6E672; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:15:19 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Matthias Andree Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:15:19 +0100 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: NEED TESTERS: e2fsprogs port, new revision X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:15:27 -0000 Hi, I have revised the e2fsprogs port, and I think it is about getting ready for prime time, so it is looking for more testers than it has had now. If you have ext2fs file systems from Linux and backed them up, please test the e2fsprogs rev02 port from: http://mandree.home.pages.de/freebsd/e2fsprogs/ and let me know how it goes, EVEN IF IT GOES WELL. It works fine for me on FreeBSD 4.9 and 5.2, I hope it does for you, but have no feedback yet from non-x86 machines. Even if you don't have ext2 file systems, you can help me, if you don't have an x86 machine: build the port, it will run the e2fsprogs self-test suite a part of the build, and report if it has passed its tests. After that, please run: dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/tmp/e2fs.img bs=1m count=64m mke2fs /var/tmp/e2fs.img # vnconfig-based tests here, see below e2fsck -f /var/tmp/e2fs.img rm -f /var/tmp/e2fs.img If you are acquainted with vnconfig, try to mount the file system after mke2fs (mount_ext2fs), do some operations, unmount, and use e2fsck. Remember to report error logs in case of trouble and your FreeBSD version and processor type ("uname -a" should do). Thanks, -- Matthias Andree Encrypt your mail: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 06:20:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 642C116A4CF for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 06:20:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (mail.dt.E-Technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE [129.217.163.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB4F743D4C for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 06:20:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de) Received: from m2a2.dyndns.org (krusty.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.163.1])25AFB1BA14 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:20:18 +0100 (CET) Received: by merlin.emma.line.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id E875D6A9; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:20:12 +0100 (CET) To: Trevor Johnson In-Reply-To: <20040127123708.A1639@blues.jpj.net> (Trevor Johnson's message of "Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:17:46 -0500 (EST)") References: <8981.1075222428@www28.gmx.net> <20040127123708.A1639@blues.jpj.net> From: Matthias Andree Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:20:11 +0100 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux_base end of life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:20:21 -0000 Trevor Johnson writes: > Do you have suggestions for other Linux distributions that could go in the > ports collection? Ones that support both Alpha and i386, are RPM-based, > have some popularity and can be downloaded would be ideal IMO. Debian. Debian-stable however is virtually unusable, but most of the applications they have are also in ports, so it doesn't hurt because we can run them natively. Debian isn't RPM based, but it's about the only one I know that has the same version for Alpha and i386 and has timely security updates. -- Matthias Andree Encrypt your mail: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 06:21:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9336C16A4CE; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 06:21:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (mailout.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3933143D68; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 06:21:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from barner@in.tum.de) Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5945E932A; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:21:08 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:21:08 +0100 From: Simon Barner Message-ID: <20040128142108.GN15226@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <40174592.2090809@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="THYEXwetZJOK3OLY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40174592.2090809@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.tu-muenchen.de cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: gnomevfs2-2.4.1_1 fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:21:24 -0000 --THYEXwetZJOK3OLY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi, please update your ports. This is fixed in gnomevfs2-2.4.2. Simon --THYEXwetZJOK3OLY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAF8VTCkn+/eutqCoRAt6UAJ9wgdwceupPTUpqczR8Fhs1HdnvtwCcCMH0 TMaMKtfg2a6dlRZ1fpInIq4= =IZky -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --THYEXwetZJOK3OLY-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 06:22:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F32D16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 06:22:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (krusty.dt.E-Technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE [129.217.163.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB2F43D6B for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 06:21:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de) Received: from m2a2.dyndns.org (krusty.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.163.1])555B51B9F8 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:21:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by merlin.emma.line.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 199EC6B8; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:21:51 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Matthias Andree Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:21:50 +0100 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: libtool .la file policy? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:22:13 -0000 Hi, what is the policy on libtool .la files? Do we install them or do we try to avoid them whenever possible? It seems libtool is smart enough to figure the link path by itself even when the .la file is missing, as long as the libraries are in a somewhat standard search path. Thanks, -- Matthias Andree Encrypt your mail: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 06:30:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0ABE16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 06:30:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from voodoo.oberon.net (voodoo.oberon.net [212.118.165.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D464F43D39 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 06:30:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net) Received: from krion by voodoo.oberon.net with local (Exim 4.30) id 1Alqi5-0005wH-0v; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:30:29 +0100 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:30:29 +0100 From: Kirill Ponomarew To: Matthias Andree Message-ID: <20040128143028.GF20343@voodoo.oberon.net> Mail-Followup-To: Kirill Ponomarew , Matthias Andree , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/QKKmeG/X/bPShih" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-NCC-Regid: de.oberon Sender: Kirill Ponomarew cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libtool .la file policy? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:30:48 -0000 --/QKKmeG/X/bPShih Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 03:21:50PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: =20 > what is the policy on libtool .la files? Do we install them or do we try > to avoid them whenever possible? It seems libtool is smart enough to > figure the link path by itself even when the .la file is missing, as > long as the libraries are in a somewhat standard search path. You can find info about it at http://freebsd.rambler.ru/ There were many argues about it. -Kirill --/QKKmeG/X/bPShih Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAF8eEQC1G6a60JuURAgkVAKCGQHNsBf2FXkoaUoL3c0kmum8AVwCeN1c+ 4UZQeOSNMn/APN9qmVwXZ58= =Rqx9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/QKKmeG/X/bPShih-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 06:53:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD0916A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 06:53:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from wckn.com (wckn.dorm.clarkson.edu [128.153.216.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66ED643D45 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 06:53:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cohentl@wckn.com) Received: from cohentl (helo=localhost) by wckn.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AlqG1-0000rq-00; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:01:29 -0500 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:01:29 -0500 (EST) From: Todd Cohen To: Simon Barner In-Reply-To: <20040127231947.GH15226@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> Message-ID: References: <20040127231947.GH15226@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.9 Release and Arla X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:53:04 -0000 It seems so.. bash-2.05b# cd / bash-2.05b# find . -name des.h -print ./usr/include/openssl/des.h ./usr/include/rpc/des.h ./usr/src/sys/crypto/des/des.h bash-2.05b# __________________________________________________________________________ "Yes, but I love gatherings. Isn't it ironic?" "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned for Sega." http://wckn.clarkson.edu/~cohentl/ On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Simon Barner wrote: > Todd Cohen wrote: > > > koerror.c:54: des.h: No such file or directory > > In file included from koerror.c:55: > > ../../include/rxkad.h:110: warning: `MAXKTCTICKETLEN' redefined > > ../../rxdef/ka.h:189: warning: this is the location of the previous > > definition > > *** Error code 1 > > Do you have OpenSSL installed? It's either in the base system (check > /usr/include/openssl/ whether des.h is there), or in the > security/openssl port (check /usr/local/include/openssl). > > Simon > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 07:05:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E775F16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 07:05:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from uucp.dinoex.sub.de (uucp.dinoex.sub.de [212.184.201.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C9DF43D3F for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 07:05:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) Received: from uucp.dinoex.sub.de (uucp.dinoex.sub.de [212.184.201.182]) by uucp.dinoex.sub.de (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i0SEZ0mJ096615; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:35:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) Received: from gate.dinoex.sub.org (dinoex@localhost)i0SEZ08S096605; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:35:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, andreasl@ludd.luth.se Message-ID: From: dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org (Dirk Meyer) Organization: privat Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:23:28 +0100 X-Mailer: Dinoex 1.79 References: <5.1.0.14.2.20040125153505.01cb2f40@mailhost.ludd.luth.se> X-Gateway: ZCONNECT gate.dinoex.sub.org [UNIX/Connect 0.94] X-PGP-Fingerprint: 44 16 EC 0A D3 3A 4F 28 8A 8A 47 93 F1 CF 2F 12 X-Copyright: (C) Copyright 2001 by Dirk Meyer -- All rights reserved. X-PGP-Key-Avail: mailto:pgp-public-keys@keys.de.pgp.net Subject:GET 0x331CDA5D X-ZC-VIA: 20040128000000W+1@dinoex.sub.org X-ZC-TELEFON: V+49-5606-6512Q F+49-5606-55023 X-ZC-POST: Im Grund 4;34317 Habichtswald;Germany MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE ports problem... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:05:49 -0000 Hallo Andreas Lindström, > I am running FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE and have gotten the latest ports distro > that includes apache 1.3.29 with mod_ssl 2.8.16 > (/usr/ports/www/apache13-mod_ssl/), the problem i have is that the patches > for this particular port wont be installed correctly. (and that the make of > the port is terminated) > > Is this a known problem or something that is specific for 4.9-RELEASE, > and... any suggestions on how to fix this? No, Please tell me what your options are, and the patch-file that is failing. you may have stale files, in doubt rm -rf /usr/ports/www/apache13-mod_ssl and cvsup your ports tree agin. kind regards Dirk - Dirk Meyer, Im Grund 4, 34317 Habichtswald, Germany - [dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org],[dirk.meyer@guug.de],[dinoex@FreeBSD.org] From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 07:47:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D64816A4CE; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 07:47:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rrcs-midsouth-24-172-16-118.biz.rr.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4235643D31; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 07:47:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from [10.2.1.4] (vpn-client-4.marcuscom.com [10.2.1.4]) i0SFj3sm011346; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:45:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Tilman Linneweh In-Reply-To: <1075288701.22414.13.camel@tl.kom.tuwien.ac.at> References: <1075288701.22414.13.camel@tl.kom.tuwien.ac.at> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-I3lyvLREC6jeYqsf2q+l" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1075304856.788.18.camel@gyros> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:47:37 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users cc: krion@freebsd.org cc: sergei@freebsd.org cc: lofi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libgcrypt update X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:47:43 -0000 --=-I3lyvLREC6jeYqsf2q+l Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 06:18, Tilman Linneweh wrote: > Hi, >=20 > You are receiving this email, because you are listed as a maintainer of > a port, that depends on security/libgcrypt.=20 >=20 > I was asked to update libgcrypt to 1.1.90 because security/vpnc need the > new features. > (see patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~arved/stuff/libgcrypt.diff ) >=20 > Unfortunately, the new version is not compatible, so I am going to ask > for a repocopy for libgcrypt-devel.=20 >=20 > I would like to get feedback, which ports already support the new > version. So If your port (or a new version of it) builds with the new > libgcrypt, please reply. I would like GnuTLS and libgcrypt updated to the latest stable versions first. This would satisfy all my needs from the GNOME standpoint.=20 Thanks. Joe >=20 > regards > arved=20 --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-I3lyvLREC6jeYqsf2q+l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAF9mYb2iPiv4Uz4cRAlCIAKCVQ762iNgujjOP045LasI2QCUB7wCfb1uX G5BUApLbv1jPkfJr43ouWVk= =JuP0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-I3lyvLREC6jeYqsf2q+l-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 07:52:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D278C16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 07:52:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rrcs-midsouth-24-172-16-118.biz.rr.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB5A43D31 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 07:52:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from [10.2.1.4] (vpn-client-4.marcuscom.com [10.2.1.4]) i0SFnusm011411; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:49:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Dirk Meyer In-Reply-To: References: <20040123181216.4ebba397.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <20040123181216.4ebba397.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <1074878691.768.23.camel@gyros> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-cvZRzHIxFXrbp/Dr/z8T" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1075305149.788.25.camel@gyros> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:52:29 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: questions about OPTIONS X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:52:32 -0000 --=-cvZRzHIxFXrbp/Dr/z8T Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 09:23, Dirk Meyer wrote: > Joe Marcus Clarke schrieb:, >=20 > > The USE_GNOME thing will work, but you may have to hack in the OpenSSL > > dependency. It would be nice if bsd.openssl.mk could be made to work > > before and after bsd.port.pre.mk (e.g. maybe Dirk could add a > > WANT_OPENSSL option like we do for GNOME). >=20 > I fail to see how WANT_OPENSSL can help us here. The idea with WANT_* was to allow a port to say that they can optionally use a component, test to see if the component is found/desired, then include it after bsd.port.pre.mk. Right now, bsd.openssl.mk is included only once in the PRE section. >=20 > USE_OPENSSL=3Dyes will include the makefile. > when bsd.pre.mk is called without USE_OPENSSL, > you can include it later without problems: >=20 > .include "${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.openssl.mk" True, but this is messy. It would be nice if this could all be done within bsd.port.mk. >=20 > I will gladly extend the support for OPTIONs. > But I still experiment with my ports how this could work. Thanks. Joe >=20 > kind regards, >=20 > - Dirk Meyer, Im Grund 4, 34317 Habichtswald, Germany > - [dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org],[dirk.meyer@guug.de],[dinoex@FreeBSD.org] > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-cvZRzHIxFXrbp/Dr/z8T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAF9q9b2iPiv4Uz4cRAnqTAJ9ky0JI630Y83U0qk67kJjq6Wo26ACgptu3 mkm+cAgiwgpcdInkrcRKMuo= =8kID -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-cvZRzHIxFXrbp/Dr/z8T-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 08:18:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93E216A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 08:18:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from outpost.globcon.net (outpost.globcon.net [62.141.88.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A2B143D1F for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 08:18:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sergei@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 55791 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2004 16:18:22 -0000 Received: from agdcgw01.akingump.com (HELO kolobov.com) (12.40.174.2) by outpost.globcon.net (62.141.88.161) with SMTP; 28 Jan 2004 16:18:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 25558 invoked by uid 911); 28 Jan 2004 16:17:53 -0000 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 19:17:53 +0300 From: Sergei Kolobov To: Joe Marcus Clarke Message-ID: <20040128161753.GE697@chetwood.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Joe Marcus Clarke , Tilman Linneweh , ports@freebsd.org, FreeBSD GNOME Users , krion@freebsd.org, lofi@freebsd.org References: <1075288701.22414.13.camel@tl.kom.tuwien.ac.at> <1075304856.788.18.camel@gyros> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n/aVsWSeQ4JHkrmm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1075304856.788.18.camel@gyros> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users cc: Tilman Linneweh cc: krion@freebsd.org cc: lofi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libgcrypt update X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:18:28 -0000 --n/aVsWSeQ4JHkrmm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2004-01-28 at 10:47 -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 06:18, Tilman Linneweh wrote: > > Hi, > >=20 > > You are receiving this email, because you are listed as a maintainer of > > a port, that depends on security/libgcrypt.=20 > >=20 > > I was asked to update libgcrypt to 1.1.90 because security/vpnc need the > > new features. > > (see patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~arved/stuff/libgcrypt.diff ) > >=20 > > Unfortunately, the new version is not compatible, so I am going to ask > > for a repocopy for libgcrypt-devel.=20 > >=20 > > I would like to get feedback, which ports already support the new > > version. So If your port (or a new version of it) builds with the new > > libgcrypt, please reply. >=20 > I would like GnuTLS and libgcrypt updated to the latest stable versions > first. This would satisfy all my needs from the GNOME standpoint.=20 > Thanks. It's a catch-22: *** *** Checking for external libraries... checking for libgcrypt-config... /pkg/bin/libgcrypt-config checking for LIBGCRYPT - version >=3D 1.1.90... no configure: error: *** *** libgcrypt was not found. You may want to get it from *** ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/alpha/libgcrypt/ *** This is GnuTLS 1.0.3, BTW. Sergei --n/aVsWSeQ4JHkrmm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAF+CxFOxuaTulNAERAhvzAJwLypD4SzXKRH2ilja+uR4/3C8P+gCfYN5A ajc4B6ynwN7a9Zlr5XxQWVk= =066L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n/aVsWSeQ4JHkrmm-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 08:24:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD7F16A4CE; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 08:24:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rrcs-midsouth-24-172-16-118.biz.rr.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9450543D1D; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 08:23:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from [10.2.1.4] (vpn-client-4.marcuscom.com [10.2.1.4]) i0SGLSsm011717; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:21:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Sergei Kolobov In-Reply-To: <20040128161753.GE697@chetwood.ru> References: <1075288701.22414.13.camel@tl.kom.tuwien.ac.at> <1075304856.788.18.camel@gyros> <20040128161753.GE697@chetwood.ru> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-8fyi9Yq7Z02ItaBJmM1O" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1075307041.788.34.camel@gyros> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:24:01 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users cc: Tilman Linneweh cc: krion@freebsd.org cc: lofi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libgcrypt update X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:24:00 -0000 --=-8fyi9Yq7Z02ItaBJmM1O Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 11:17, Sergei Kolobov wrote: > On 2004-01-28 at 10:47 -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 06:18, Tilman Linneweh wrote: > > > Hi, > > >=20 > > > You are receiving this email, because you are listed as a maintainer = of > > > a port, that depends on security/libgcrypt.=20 > > >=20 > > > I was asked to update libgcrypt to 1.1.90 because security/vpnc need = the > > > new features. > > > (see patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~arved/stuff/libgcrypt.diff ) > > >=20 > > > Unfortunately, the new version is not compatible, so I am going to as= k > > > for a repocopy for libgcrypt-devel.=20 > > >=20 > > > I would like to get feedback, which ports already support the new > > > version. So If your port (or a new version of it) builds with the new > > > libgcrypt, please reply. > >=20 > > I would like GnuTLS and libgcrypt updated to the latest stable versions > > first. This would satisfy all my needs from the GNOME standpoint.=20 > > Thanks. >=20 > It's a catch-22: >=20 > *** > *** Checking for external libraries... >=20 > checking for libgcrypt-config... /pkg/bin/libgcrypt-config > checking for LIBGCRYPT - version >=3D 1.1.90... no > configure: error: > *** > *** libgcrypt was not found. You may want to get it from > *** ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/alpha/libgcrypt/ > *** >=20 > This is GnuTLS 1.0.3, BTW. Ah, I didn't know GnuTLS 1.0 depended on devel versions of libgcrypt.=20 That seems kind of silly. Joe >=20 > Sergei --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-8fyi9Yq7Z02ItaBJmM1O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAF+Ihb2iPiv4Uz4cRAuUCAJ9JpdcBvMCpGjHHAnGAjU/9KlFFpACfbVWI cKVVGxv5i+LTO2YwqjCwqCE= =wvFT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-8fyi9Yq7Z02ItaBJmM1O-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 08:32:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE49716A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 08:32:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (smtp.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 258C243D2F for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 08:32:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (smtp.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.231]) by smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (8.12.6p2/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i0SGVqxt087922 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 18:31:52 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 18:31:51 +0200 (EET) From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040128175222.X24103@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Netscape 7.1 + javavm X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:32:42 -0000 Hello! Is there a possibility to get working javavm plugin for Netscape 7.1 with the current ports? I've read in Netscape 7.1 Release Notes that I want JDK 1.4.2 or later to get working Java, so I've installed: linux_base-7.1_5 The base set of packages needed in Linux mode netscape7-7.1 Linux Netscape suite linux-sun-jdk-1.4.2.02 Sun Java Development Kit 1.4 for Linux Then I've tried to copy /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/jre/plugin/i386/ns610/libjavaplugin_oji.so to /usr/local/lib/linux-netscape7-english/plugins, but I've got the following error while starting Netscape: INTERNAL ERROR on Browser End: No manager for initializing factory? System error?:: Success Well, then I've copied /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/jre/plugin/i386/ns610-gcc32/libjavaplugin_oji.so to /usr/local/lib/linux-netscape7-english/plugins. This time I've got the following warning during the launch of Netscape: LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library /usr/local/lib/linux-netscape7-english/plugins/libjavaplugin_oji.so [libgcc_s.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory] I've tried to install libgcc_s.so.1 into my /compat/linux environment from libgcc-3.0.4-1.i386.rpm (Red Hat Linux 7.2 for i386), this time Netscape started OK, but abnormally terminated while trying to display page which requires JavaVM with the following output: INTERNAL ERROR on Browser End: Exec of "java_vm" failed: 2 < System error?:: No such file or directory Gdk-ERROR **: Fatal IO error 9 (Bad file descriptor) on X server :0.0. INTERNAL ERROR on Browser End: Could not read ack from child process System error?:: Resource temporarily unavailable So, is it possible to get working JavaVM with Netscape 7.1? If so, how to do that? My OS version is 4.9-RELEASE-p1. Sincerely, Dmitry -- Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 08:42:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B35516A4CF for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 08:42:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from outpost.globcon.net (outpost.globcon.net [62.141.88.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 21DBA43D53 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 08:42:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sergei@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 56066 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2004 16:42:11 -0000 Received: from agdcgw01.akingump.com (HELO kolobov.com) (12.40.174.2) by outpost.globcon.net (62.141.88.161) with SMTP; 28 Jan 2004 16:42:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 25611 invoked by uid 911); 28 Jan 2004 16:41:42 -0000 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 19:41:42 +0300 From: Sergei Kolobov To: Joe Marcus Clarke Message-ID: <20040128164142.GF697@chetwood.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Joe Marcus Clarke , ports@freebsd.org, FreeBSD GNOME Users , Tilman Linneweh , krion@freebsd.org, lofi@freebsd.org References: <1075288701.22414.13.camel@tl.kom.tuwien.ac.at> <1075304856.788.18.camel@gyros> <20040128161753.GE697@chetwood.ru> <1075307041.788.34.camel@gyros> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WK3l2KTTmXPVedZ6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1075307041.788.34.camel@gyros> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users cc: Tilman Linneweh cc: krion@freebsd.org cc: lofi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libgcrypt update X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:42:17 -0000 --WK3l2KTTmXPVedZ6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2004-01-28 at 11:24 -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 11:17, Sergei Kolobov wrote: > > checking for libgcrypt-config... /pkg/bin/libgcrypt-config > > checking for LIBGCRYPT - version >=3D 1.1.90... no > > configure: error: > > *** > > *** libgcrypt was not found. You may want to get it from > > *** ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/alpha/libgcrypt/ > > *** > >=20 > > This is GnuTLS 1.0.3, BTW. >=20 > Ah, I didn't know GnuTLS 1.0 depended on devel versions of libgcrypt.=20 > That seems kind of silly. As far as I can tell, *ALL* versions of libgcrypt are technically considered development, as they are all in alpha/ subdir of gnupg.org. Perhaps latest versions of all other ports that depend on libgcrypt will also work (or require) recent libgcrypt. I haven't looked into=20 that myself, though. Sergei --WK3l2KTTmXPVedZ6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAF+ZGFOxuaTulNAERAo9eAKCVwW+187i2P8vGVqsPWHdN3D4IuwCdGkZI B/2co8ZYAEkwjE1S94B0xg0= =6YcU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WK3l2KTTmXPVedZ6-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 09:12:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE6F16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:12:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mgr2.xmission.com (mgr2.xmission.com [198.60.22.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A79543D2D for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:12:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: from [198.60.22.208] (helo=mx2.xmission.com) by mgr2.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AltEr-00049U-02; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:12:29 -0700 Received: from [207.135.128.145] (helo=misty.eyesbeyond.com) by mx2.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AltEp-0006mW-SR; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:12:28 -0700 Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (localhost.eyesbeyond.com [127.0.0.1]) i0SHCNN2045153; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:12:24 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: (from glewis@localhost) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0SHCLCf045152; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:12:21 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) X-Authentication-Warning: misty.eyesbeyond.com: glewis set sender to glewis@eyesbeyond.com using -f Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:12:21 -0700 From: Greg Lewis To: Matthias Andree Message-ID: <20040128171221.GA43797@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on mx2.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=8.0 tests=BAYES_44 autolearn=no version=2.61 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: glewis@eyesbeyond.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 3.1 (built Mon Jan 26 13:00:24 MST 2004) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NEED TESTERS: e2fsprogs port, new revision X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:12:32 -0000 > > I have revised the e2fsprogs port, and I think it is about getting ready > for prime time, so it is looking for more testers than it has had now. > > If you have ext2fs file systems from Linux and backed them up, please > test the e2fsprogs