From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 17 18:41:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC8216A4CE for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 18:41:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-d05.mx.aol.com (imo-d05.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7909D43D1D for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 18:41:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from TM4525@aol.com) Received: from TM4525@aol.com by imo-d05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id e.1f3.10ada5c (14374); Sun, 17 Oct 2004 14:40:56 -0400 (EDT) From: TM4525@aol.com Message-ID: <1f3.10ada5c.2ea416b8@aol.com> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 14:40:56 EDT To: racerx@makeworld.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5114 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The release of 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 18:41:09 -0000 I don't see how they can possible consider the "Release" of an O/S version when perhaps the most widely-available NIC (em) doesn't work.