Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:06:55 -0700
From:      pete wright <nomadlogic@gmail.com>
To:        Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
Cc:        Jean-Paul Natola <jnatola@familycareintl.org>, "questions@FreeBSD.org" <questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: iptables equivaelnt
Message-ID:  <AANLkTikmfR3LTphXoQN7bdYNridf1gUAMojjF8mIGW51@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <29017079-55A2-406B-891B-6EEB239EF730@mac.com>
References:  <AB2BC18AD166C948A0BC559E22CE9C9109EE7844@FCIEXCHANGE1.FCI> <29017079-55A2-406B-891B-6EEB239EF730@mac.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> wrote:
> Hi--
>
> On Jun 21, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
>> I'm looking for FREEBSD's equivalent of iptables
>>
>> I'm particuclary trying to implement some =A0type of rate control as we =
are getting hammered by spam.
>
> The three major choices available with FreeBSD are documented here:
>
> =A0http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls.ht=
ml
>

I'd humbly suggest pf + spamd if you are concerned specifically about
stopping spam, both are supported by freebsd and i have had great
success using these tools to combat spam.

-pete


--=20
pete wright
www.nycbug.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikmfR3LTphXoQN7bdYNridf1gUAMojjF8mIGW51>