Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 9 Jul 2004 09:50:11 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
To:        Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ethercons updated for -CURRENT
Message-ID:  <16622.41619.355522.170000@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040709005644.60816F-100000@fledge.watson.org>
References:  <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040709005644.60816F-100000@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Robert Watson writes:
 > having console I/O on the wire isn't such a big deal).  The other major
 > limitation is that it relies on the network stack functioning, so can't be
 > used for very early boot stuff, debugging, etc.  Despite these

How far into a crash does it work?  Eg, will it print the panic
string?  How about a DDB_TRACE? 

Thanks,

Drew



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16622.41619.355522.170000>