Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 17:59:42 -0500 From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? Message-ID: <17825.31582.782224.263685@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950@mail.gmail.com> References: <73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Lu writes: > So, why is there a move to find a replacement or something? > Software shouldn't be replaced for the sole reason of being old > if it works, right? As I understand the discussion: among others, because there are features people want to add that don't fit in the current model. (Personally, I think there are also points where the correct user behavior is not intuitively obvious.) Robert Huff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17825.31582.782224.263685>