Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:20:33 -0800 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: vd@FreeBSD.org Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/mpatrol Makefile ports/devel/mpatrol/files patch-..::..::src::mptrace.c Message-ID: <454AFBD1.7000503@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20061103080328.GA73249@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> References: <200611030351.kA33peWQ061783@repoman.freebsd.org> <20061103061317.GB64699@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <454ADF4A.5080201@FreeBSD.org> <20061103064819.GA64957@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <454AE6B2.70702@FreeBSD.org> <20061103070602.GA65515@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <454AEF2B.1000007@FreeBSD.org> <20061103080328.GA73249@qlovarnika.bg.datamax>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Vasil Dimov wrote: >> If somebody has sneaked its own definition into Porters Handbook I can't >> care less. > > I would not call this sneaking. How would you call it if somebody commits something that is against current practice without getting majority signing in? I can just easy to back out this paragraph as it went in, so what? I suspect that nobody would notice. >> It is not official unless majority of active porters agree >> upon it. > > You want a vote or what? > > I really believe this discussion is going nowhere. It is not going nowhere. You are trying to enforce some rules that you have no right to enforce. And that the whole point of this discussion. I am sorry, but but the fact that somebody committed some questionable words into porters handbook doesn't mean that it's official. -Maxim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?454AFBD1.7000503>