Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 19:32:36 +0200 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely5.cicely.de> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: alpha@FreeBSD.ORG, smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Prelimiary interrupt thread patches for alpha Message-ID: <20000915193236.B61065@cicely5.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <20000915092609.B72881@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.ORG on Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 09:26:09AM -0700 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009141549450.86297-200000@salmon.nlsystems.com> <200009142254.PAA95214@pike.osd.bsdi.com> <20000915075812.B60348@cicely5.cicely.de> <20000915091826.A72881@dragon.nuxi.com> <20000915092609.B72881@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 09:26:09AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 09:18:26AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 07:58:12AM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: > > > > > > miata means that it should be testable on a PC164 - right? > > > > No. There are some differences in the chipsets used. > > Let me expand on this answer -- just because something worked on a Miata > does not mean it will work on a PC164. Of course something working (or > not working) does mean it is worth testing to see if it works on a PC164. I wanted to know if there are known show stoppers. "worth testing" is exactly what I tried to say with testable. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000915193236.B61065>