From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 26 06:32:23 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB5716A418 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 06:32:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C341C13C442 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 06:32:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so715530waf for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:32:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=EBEEBsdhyDrxqOjiOPlRSCnkMEjD4t/NuTEBiziXEM0=; b=RMwySm4I59r4Q/I/11VUzIhaBf6/y5akN9t7E0dnMBHCUHPfSuZMME18GG9GSjDMls/EcwtJMvTpLwKqeL4nSL8sfhTDaVqlq6wjQWW9hfJdjPyrmUw9rRz58o2u079TrhH3cT8JrY7XDukICtlxQY+DPsYAflLQClxdiVUxaCc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nVduXv1m+PHxMW2FWHoiwhoZik1knSl4aSd6q0FEizNWLXNNtEKAZOhNSXuZfwZAInBe6bhyQoXYICmkSna+Kf9Hmta+4GJDLQ0Xs7jFy/ZwYMGWedstui+nD/YTx8dg81w7ws7BNbJ87hWhZAvMZZOraCvn05m1ebl7G5LgsdA= Received: by 10.115.79.1 with SMTP id g1mr410221wal.1196058733174; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:32:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.13.15 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:32:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:32:13 -0800 From: "Kip Macy" To: gnn@freebsd.org, "Oleksandr Tymoshenko" , current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <474983F1.3030700@pbxpress.com> Cc: Subject: Re: Is it possible to debug an AMD kernel on Intel X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 06:32:23 -0000 That worked fine for us at netapp, don't know how well we're setup for the kernel specific bits. Also can we do what the rest of the world does and refer to it as x86_64 or 64-bit intel? Continuing to refer to it as amd (I know they came up with instruction set extensions but its now a fundamental part of the x86 ISA) only serves to confuse new users. -Kip On 11/25/07, gnn@freebsd.org wrote: > At Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:17:21 +0200, > Oleksandr Tymoshenko wrote: > > > > gnn@freebsd.org wrote: > > > or vice versa? That is, can I do kgdb/gdb over serial from an Intel > > > box to an AMD box? > > Funny I'm about to preform similar task :) I'm going to try method > > described here: http://bsdimp.blogspot.com/2007/10/cross-debugger.html > > > > I should be trying this in the near future and will report results > here. I noted the cross debugger in ports, and I'm hoping I can use > that with kernel debugging. > > > Later, > George > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >