Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1998 09:24:32 +0200 From: Thomas Zenker <thz@lennartz-electronic.de> To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> Cc: small@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Command-line i/f vs WWW i/f Message-ID: <19981007092432.A4913@tue.le> In-Reply-To: <Version.32.19981006001935.00e3cd10@pop.wxs.nl>; from Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai on Tue, Oct 06, 1998 at 12:23:20AM %2B0200 References: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9810051410490.4561-100000@korin.warman.org.pl> <000401bdf065$da48a900$0104010a@andrewh.famzon.com.au> <Version.32.19981006001935.00e3cd10@pop.wxs.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 06, 1998 at 12:23:20AM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > True, yet see my other post about the ideas I have a this point about CLI > vs WWW. Enough to say that should we have to implement the www pages, we > need a very minimal HTTP 1.0 compliant daemon, plus the pages, and that all have a look at thttpd of Jef Poskanzer at http://www.acme.com/software/thttpd Very smart, really small footprint, BSD style copyright. I have it running here in our intranet on 386/33 8MB, which has to do other things too. We use FBSD in an embedded application with a 40 MB HD, (20MB + 20MB swap), for configuring the first time we connect VGA/keyboard. But for some time now I am thinking about other solutions as well - WWW would be much more feasible for our customers, they aren't unix freaks at all. -- Thomas Zenker at work thz@lennartz-electronic.de private thz@tuebingen.netsurf.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981007092432.A4913>