From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 29 22:41:12 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 900B616A4D0; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 22:41:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 77F2043FCB; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 22:41:11 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9U6fAE7039486;
	Wed, 29 Oct 2003 23:41:10 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 23:41:08 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <20031029.234108.97396294.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: scottl@freebsd.org
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20031029.232311.115991039.imp@bsdimp.com>
References: <20031029.222828.133432192.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<3FA0A683.40108@freebsd.org>
	<20031029.232311.115991039.imp@bsdimp.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org
cc: src-committers@freebsd.org
cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org
cc: nate@root.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf options src/sys/i386/acpica Makefile
 acpi_wakecode.S src/sys/i386/conf NOTES
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 06:41:12 -0000

In message: <20031029.232311.115991039.imp@bsdimp.com>
            M. Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> writes:
: The "general silliness of compiling SMP for all modules" was a design
: decision for SMPng made a long time ago.  That's why there's no longer
: a SMP kernel option.

Actually, I'm smoking crack here.  Forget I said it.

We do, however, don't use the lock prefix on UP kernels.  Instead,
modules call the atomic functions, rather than inlining them.

Warner