From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun  9 00:54:44 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F1616A41C
	for <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>; Thu,  9 Jun 2005 00:54:44 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org
	(CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com
	[69.194.102.232])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E8FE43D48
	for <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>; Thu,  9 Jun 2005 00:54:43 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 6687D51269; Wed,  8 Jun 2005 20:54:42 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:54:42 -0400
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Francisco Reyes <lists@natserv.com>
Message-ID: <20050609005442.GA10723@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <20050608165110.O11353@zoraida.natserv.net>
	<20050608233027.GA94104@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<20050608203207.X12338@zoraida.natserv.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050608203207.X12338@zoraida.natserv.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: FreeBSD amd64 List <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>,
	Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject: Re: Ocaml or Unison port working for anyone?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform <freebsd-amd64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 00:54:44 -0000


--pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 08:52:40PM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>=20
> >>Why do some ports require i386? Instructions not supported by gcc in
> >>AMD64?
> >
> >Non-portable assumptions in the code (e.g. sizeof(void *) =3D=3D sizeof(=
int))
>=20
> I had never looked at those error logs before but it seemed like the port=
=20
> compiled and there were errors deleting some files. Since I could not=20
> find any build errors tried to look at other report logs to see how=20
> errors look, but the handfull I tried none had logs. :-(
>=20
>=20
> >http://pointyhat.freebsd.org.
>=20
> I was looking at the "by error type vs build environment". How often is=
=20
> that run? The date on top was from late May.
>=20
> Also on the "last run 5.X" many of the ports don't have any logs. What=20
> does that mean? At first I thought maybe it meant they compiled ok, but=
=20
> looking for ports I have compiled, none was found so the complete list=20
> seems like it's broken ports.

You probably want to look at where it says "look here to find the most
recent error with your port"

Kris

--pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCp5NRWry0BWjoQKURAl2LAKD7OkpS/3qgAlQUxBri6VDZym3ltwCg5TcF
qd0kc7rBeYWy+2juLtDmEuk=
=hPu5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt--