Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 Oct 2004 18:48:46 +0300
From:      Iasen Kostov <tbyte@OTEL.net>
To:        Pawel Malachowski <pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: PPTP/PPPoE mpd/poptop performance
Message-ID:  <418114DE.6000600@OTEL.net>
In-Reply-To: <20041028131316.GA73157@shellma.zin.lublin.pl>
References:  <20041026153108.GA91134@shellma.zin.lublin.pl> <20041028113808.GB50262@cell.sick.ru> <20041028131316.GA73157@shellma.zin.lublin.pl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pawel Malachowski wrote:

>On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 03:38:08PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I'd suggest to choose PPPoE, not PPTP, because the latter is quite
>>complicated and violated by some client implementation. You will
>>not find any problems with PPPoE, since ng_pppoe is compatible with
>>all known PPPoE implementations.
>>    
>>
>
>This is what I am currently looking at. I am considering PPTP only because
>client is already available in Windows machines for free. While in XP PPPoE
>is already in, I don't see free PPPoE clients for Win9x.
>I am a bit worried about behaviour in lossy WiFi environments; I'll give it
>a try in free time, I guess.
>
>  
>
    I use them both(PPTP and PPPoE) on every machine serving as access 
concentrator - and leave decision of "what to use" to the client side :).
(btw there are PPPoE clients for win98 - RASPPPoE it was I think).



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?418114DE.6000600>