Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:26:46 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, "Alan L. Cox" <alc@imimic.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: getsysfd() patch #1 (Re: Virtual memory question) Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030116142426.3721N-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <200301161901.h0GJ1htn023581@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Matthew Dillon wrote: > The idea of using the mach port primitive is not a bad idea, though. You might want to take a look at the NetBSD src/sys/compat/mach and src/sys/compat/darwin trees to see if anything there is useful. When I last looked closely, it was mostly prototypes, but glancing at it now it looks like they've made a lot of progress. This URL seems to be useful: http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/compat/ Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030116142426.3721N-100000>