Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 00:06:18 -0800 (PST) From: <mike@FreeBSD.org> To: ports@geeksrus.net, mike@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/35598: In -CURRENT, arpa/inet.h & netinet/in.h each must include the other Message-ID: <200203100806.g2A86IG90382@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Synopsis: In -CURRENT, arpa/inet.h & netinet/in.h each must include the other State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: mike State-Changed-When: Sat Mar 9 23:59:11 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: <netinet/in.h> and <arpa/inet.h> have never in their history ever required one another to compile. There was a ordering bug where ntohl() and family were redefined to their double underscored variants before providing prototypes. This broken some C++ software since missing prototypes are fatal in C++, and I think what this PR was actually referring to (though you wouldn't know it from reading it). This problem was solved today. http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=35598 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200203100806.g2A86IG90382>