Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 16:39:11 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=c3=a9?= <royger@FreeBSD.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r301197 - head/sys/dev/xen/netfront Message-ID: <a02372d7-b5a0-e008-7a67-71c6a777bfa6@selasky.org> In-Reply-To: <20160602142824.m6d24n2rx3i2kclt@mac> References: <201606021114.u52BEQqB047172@repo.freebsd.org> <2c81e44d-65de-10f0-8837-f23896855150@selasky.org> <20160602125422.gmdsueoeu5fiiec5@mac> <c8ef340a-e3d3-af3e-d45c-eedf4183750b@selasky.org> <20160602142824.m6d24n2rx3i2kclt@mac>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/02/16 16:28, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > Thanks for the clarification. I did get the impression that callout_reset > already distributed the callbacks across the number of available CPUs, maybe > the man page should be expanded to explain this? Hi, It makes sense that callout_reset() should distribute callouts by default, though I can imagine that that there are applications which depend on a strict callback order for timeouts. +1 --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a02372d7-b5a0-e008-7a67-71c6a777bfa6>