Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 12:29:52 -0500 (CDT) From: Nick Rogness <nick@rogness.net> To: universe <universe@truemetal.org> Cc: Boril Yonchev <by@hibit.net>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: default routes from other net Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0109191223030.88818-100000@cody.jharris.com> In-Reply-To: <3BA8D0A3.E63F8541@truemetal.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, universe wrote: > now, assuming the scenario Boril posted, and the commands Nick gave > would result in: > > su-2.05# route add default 212.212.212.212 > route: writing to routing socket: Network is unreachable > add net default: gateway 212.212.212.212: Network is unreachable > > does this actually only work when the router at 212.212.212.212 has > proxy-arp enabled or is there absolutely no relation to proxy-arp > here? i've trying to find out for months now, but no one seems to be > able to answer that question. > No. This message is saying that the network is not directly reachable or the host is not reachable through a directly connected network. This does work in WIndows, Linux...but not FreeBSD because it is not a proper way to do routing. You could try: route add -host 212.212.212.212 -iface ep0 ipfw add 100 fwd 212.212.212.212 ip from any to any out via ep0 I don't know if it will work or not. Nick Rogness <nick@rogness.net> - Keep on Routing in a Free World... "FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0109191223030.88818-100000>