Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 19:27:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/stdio ftell.c ungetc.c Message-ID: <200108312327.f7VNRMs83151@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20010901024748.A23318@nagual.pp.ru> References: <200108311950.f7VJoPd48683@freefall.freebsd.org> <mu9n14g2bq8.wl@cx281057-a.irvn1.occa.home.com> <20010901010738.B21988@nagual.pp.ru> <20010901024748.A23318@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Sat, 1 Sep 2001 02:47:51 +0400, "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> said: > 1) Unspecified < 0 (as it was in FreeBSD). It is in coflict with > POSIX specs about ftell(): fseek() and ftell() are incorporated into POSIX from ISO C, and POSIX defers to the C definition of these interfaces. > It says "otherwise", i.e. ftell() can't return -1 normally, so we are in > conflict. No, it does not say anything remotely like that. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200108312327.f7VNRMs83151>