From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 15:13:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D9F16A4CF for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:13:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postman.inteliport.com (postman.inteliport.com [208.27.31.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8103B43D46 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:13:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from colane@inteliport.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (ip39.inteliport.net [208.27.31.39]) by postman.inteliport.com (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id j37FCqX21080 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:12:52 -0400 Message-ID: <42554DFD.6030200@inteliport.com> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:13:01 -0400 From: Christopher Lane User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: Re: Sysinstall + CVSup or just CVSup? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 15:13:06 -0000 Nick Pavlica wrote: > Chris, > I alway install the ports that I want during my initial installation > so I'm not sure what the best post installation method is. I would > venture to say that cvsup would be you best bet. > > --Nick > My goal is to have the latest ports, regardless of which ones I actually want to install. I guess my question is more "can I CVSup without first installing the ports collection, and if I do so, does that save time or take longer?" - Chris