Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 09:38:20 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Henk van Oers <hvoers@anp.nl> Cc: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.ORG>, Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Message-ID: <199907281538.JAA01258@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.QNX4.4.02.9907281643190.13890-100000@ns.anp.nl> References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907280217180.71863-100000@janus.syracuse.net> <Pine.QNX4.4.02.9907281643190.13890-100000@ns.anp.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> And then ... securelevel == 3 I think it is better NOT to permit > 'sysctl -w', 'ipfw *' AND a logging limmit, just process the logfile > faster to avoid DoS The real issue we are dealing with is what happens at securelevel == 3. What you are saying is that people shouldn't be allowed to modify *anything* at securelevel == 3, correct? Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907281538.JAA01258>