From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 26 16:54:44 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 926DAF39; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 16:54:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from i3mail.icecube.wisc.edu (i3mail.icecube.wisc.edu [128.104.255.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA742101; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 16:54:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by i3mail.icecube.wisc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D815438052; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:54:43 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at icecube.wisc.edu Received: from i3mail.icecube.wisc.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (i3mail.icecube.wisc.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id s62LnpLqnpTI; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:54:43 -0500 (CDT) Received: from comporellon.tachypleus.net (polaris.tachypleus.net [75.101.50.44]) by i3mail.icecube.wisc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A084A38051; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:54:42 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <53AC5051.3020309@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:54:41 -0700 From: Nathan Whitehorn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: Boost 1.55.0 (Was: Re: PowerPC Packages) References: <539DC0C5.60603@freebsd.org> <20140623131222.GA26450@FreeBSD.org> <20140625073340.GA57075@FreeBSD.org> <20140625072305.45baf39b@zhabar.att.net> <20140626100258.GA47002@FreeBSD.org> <53AC3DB2.3070902@freebsd.org> <20140626154416.GD24440@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <53AC4C02.2030405@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <53AC4C02.2030405@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Justin Hibbits , FreeBSD Mailing List , FreeBSD PowerPC ML X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 16:54:44 -0000 On 06/26/14 09:36, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 06/26/14 08:44, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 08:35:14AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >>> On 06/26/14 03:02, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 07:23:05AM -0700, Justin Hibbits wrote: >>>>> As I mentioned earlier, you can set "FAVORITE_COMPILER=gcc" in >>>>> make.conf, and it'll build with gcc47. >>>> FAVORITE_COMPILER looks more like a hack to me. Ideally boost's port >>>> Makefile should be fixed instead. >>>> >>>> I also would rather use system compiler (whether it's gcc4.2 or clang) >>>> instead of gcc47. >>>> >>>> ./danfe >>>> >>> Yes, it should be made to respect whatever cc is. >> As long as cc is supported upstream, boost being a nightmare to >> maintain I will >> reject all patches that are not accepted upstream first, otherwise >> bumping to >> 1.56 will be painful. >> >> That said I fully support the effort. >> >> regards, >> Bapt > > Surely there's a way to pass the compiler that you want to bjam at the > command line. > -Nathan As a follow-up, it is using clang because the ports system tells it to, not because of something in boost. boost has c++11-lang in its Makefile, which makes bsd.compiler.mk set CXX to clang++, which boost then uses. -Nathan