From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jun 30 10:20:39 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA05139 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 30 Jun 1997 10:20:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tera.com (tera.tera.com [207.108.223.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA05132 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 1997 10:20:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by tera.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with UUCP id KAA18068; Mon, 30 Jun 1997 10:17:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.8.5/8.7.3) id KAA01827; Mon, 30 Jun 1997 10:07:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Gary Kline Message-Id: <199706301707.KAA01827@tao.thought.org> Subject: Re: SCSI Hardware (was: QIC-80 Floppy Tapes) In-Reply-To: <199706301602.MAA01404@limbo.senate.org> from Nathan Dorfman at "Jun 30, 97 12:02:52 pm" To: nathan@senate.org (Nathan Dorfman) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 10:07:21 -0700 (PDT) Cc: bdodson@beowulf.utmb.edu, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Organization: <> thought.org: public access uNix in service... <> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk According to Nathan Dorfman: > Nonetheless, I paid only $100 for this drive about two years ago and > don't have the money to purchase a SCSI tape, at least not for this > computer which doesn't even have a SCSI adapter. I thought that there'd > be others like me and this would generate some interest; obviously I > was wrong. As I plan to make my next computer all SCSI, can I change > the subject and ask this: If I were to get computer A instead of computer > B below, what (approximately) would be the price difference? > > A B > SCSI 3.1GB HD EIDE 3.1GB HD > SCSI CD-ROM IDE/ATAPI CD-ROM > SCSI Tape Drive IDE/ATAPI Tape (do they exist?) > SCSI CD-R non-SCSI equivalent of CD-R > > I heard that a SCSI adapter to manage so many devices at once would > be around $150, plus the devices themselves will be more expensive. I > would appreciate any input on this topic. > > > From the recent prices that I've seen, a ballpark estimate is roughly $500 more for the SCSI system. I may be imagining this, but things-SCSI seem to last; seem more trouble-free. And in our world, are easier to configure. Depends on what you want, and how much time//effort//headbanging you are willing to put up with. Me, I'll stick with SCSI and sleep better.... gary kline