Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 12:25:30 +0100 From: Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org> To: Maxime Henrion <mux@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Marcus Alves Grando <mnag@FreeBSD.org>, vd@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/csup Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <1150975530.79359.25.camel@mayday.esat.net> In-Reply-To: <20060622112116.GO8070@elvis.mu.org> References: <200606211711.k5LHBGfr014825@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060622101749.GA58621@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <1150972702.79359.16.camel@mayday.esat.net> <20060622112116.GO8070@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-amMMC8jKCK/EhZwBwU4a
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 13:21 +0200, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> Florent Thoumie wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 13:17 +0300, Vasil Dimov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 05:11:16PM +0000, Marcus Alves Grando wrote:
> > > > mnag 2006-06-21 17:11:16 UTC
> > > >=20
> > > > FreeBSD ports repository
> > > >=20
> > > > Modified files:
> > > > net/csup Makefile distinfo=20
> > > > Log:
> > > > - Update to 20060318
> > > > - Fix build in tinderbox using ${OSVERSION} instead .if exists()
> > > > =20
> > > > Approved by: mux
> > > > =20
> > >=20
> > > % portupgrade /var/db/pkg/csup-20060313_1/
> > > ** Port marked as IGNORE: net/csup:
> > > is already in the base system
> > > % which csup
> > > /usr/local/bin/csup
> > > % ls -l /usr/bin/csup
> > > ls: /usr/bin/csup: No such file or directory
> > > % sysctl kern.osreldate
> > > kern.osreldate: 601100
> > > %
>=20
> Looks like mnag@ picked up a wrong osreldate number. I don't have the
> time to fix it myself but anyone wanting to take care of it has my
> approval.
>=20
> > It's a bit unrelated but why one wouldn't want to have both csup from
> > base and ports? I don't want to upgrade my system just to have a recent
> > csup.
>=20
> I don't expect to see many new versions of csup in the future, so it
> doesn't make much sense to have both the csup port and the version from
> the base.
I was under the impression that csup was moving fast lately. If you're
not planning a lot of new releases it's not that useful indeed.
--=20
Florent Thoumie
flz@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD Committer
--=-amMMC8jKCK/EhZwBwU4a
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBEmn4qMxEkbVFH3PQRAnc7AJ9/dnFDVuJRlpIRSgdMK8QMWriaHwCgiCp8
3g9iOSX685mS25rBBt3DXGA=
=ctEO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-amMMC8jKCK/EhZwBwU4a--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1150975530.79359.25.camel>