Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 23:30:44 -0500 From: Matt Rowley <matt@arin.net> To: obrien@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 and Adaptec raidutils (again) Message-ID: <7528EBE92E58DD12C40EF72E@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20041219204352.GA42665@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <A6125B2CFEDE2BEDF10D9FA6@elric.arin.net> <20041211004038.GC50516@dragon.nuxi.com> <11A4B937C9C745F2DD5B75EC@elric.arin.net> <20041217081458.GB10368@dan.emsphone.com> <41C30321.5060209@freebsd.org> <22C3670E71A83C719BAC25E9@elric.arin.net> <20041219204352.GA42665@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> :) It does compile, when you remove packed. After commenting out the >> unneeded semaphore union struct in basic.hh, the whole thing compiles. >> The resulting raidutil binary spews out the same error as the one >> from the current binary port about "Engine connect failed: >> COMPATIBILITY number"... but that's to be expected. > > Can you post a patch to the sources? We should make the port build from > source, but it never rose high enough on my priority list. Is anyone > interested in working with me in updating the port? I definitely am. I'm having trouble finding a good source to use though... is it kosher to pull from ftp.netbsd.org? Their ftp site is the only place I've found that has raidmgt-3.31.tar.gz ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/distfiles/raidmgt-3.31.tar.gz
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7528EBE92E58DD12C40EF72E>