From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 04:31:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E79416A4CE; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 04:31:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp2.arin.net (smtp2.arin.net [192.149.252.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269CA43D2F; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 04:31:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@arin.net) Received: by smtp2.arin.net (Postfix, from userid 5003) id 5279F1449E1; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 23:31:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (wolf.spinthread.com [66.93.83.176]) by smtp2.arin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124721449DB; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 23:31:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 23:30:44 -0500 From: Matt Rowley To: obrien@freebsd.org Message-ID: <7528EBE92E58DD12C40EF72E@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20041219204352.GA42665@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20041211004038.GC50516@dragon.nuxi.com> <11A4B937C9C745F2DD5B75EC@elric.arin.net> <20041217081458.GB10368@dan.emsphone.com> <41C30321.5060209@freebsd.org> <22C3670E71A83C719BAC25E9@elric.arin.net> <20041219204352.GA42665@dragon.nuxi.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-arin1 (2004-01-11) on smtp2.arin.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63-arin1 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 and Adaptec raidutils (again) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 04:31:18 -0000 >> :) It does compile, when you remove packed. After commenting out the >> unneeded semaphore union struct in basic.hh, the whole thing compiles. >> The resulting raidutil binary spews out the same error as the one >> from the current binary port about "Engine connect failed: >> COMPATIBILITY number"... but that's to be expected. > > Can you post a patch to the sources? We should make the port build from > source, but it never rose high enough on my priority list. Is anyone > interested in working with me in updating the port? I definitely am. I'm having trouble finding a good source to use though... is it kosher to pull from ftp.netbsd.org? Their ftp site is the only place I've found that has raidmgt-3.31.tar.gz ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/distfiles/raidmgt-3.31.tar.gz