From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Jul 16 5: 9:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from gw.willscreek.com (gw.willscreek.com [216.158.26.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9C437B614; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 05:09:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmc@WillsCreek.COM) Received: from tributary.inside.willscreek.com (tributary.inside.willscreek.com [172.16.87.5]) by gw.willscreek.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA58833; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 08:09:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from current.inside.willscreek.com (IDENT:bmc@current.inside.willscreek.com [172.16.87.2]) by tributary.inside.willscreek.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA64549; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 08:09:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200007161209.IAA64549@tributary.inside.willscreek.com> From: Brian Clapper MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 08:08:59 -0400 (EDT) To: SADA Kenji Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, nectar@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sysutils/fileutils In-Reply-To: <200007160949.SAA94972@home.bsdclub.org> References: <200007160949.SAA94972@home.bsdclub.org> X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under Emacs 20.5.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 16 July, 2000, at 18:49 (+0900) SADA Kenji wrote: > I've checked in sysutils/fileutils > > and now misc/gnuls may have to be removed. > Do you have any comment with this ? If the functionality provided by gnuls is now provided by the larger fileutils port, then I certainly can find no reason to object about the removal of the gnuls port. Brian Clapper, bmc@WillsCreek.COM Wasting time is an important part of living. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message