Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 21:15:54 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, mark@grondar.za, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PAM pacthes we discuss Message-ID: <20020119181554.GL11604@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0201190950480.2065-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> References: <xzpu1ti6xp2.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0201190950480.2065-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 09:53:02 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > Andrey, > The backing ou of a patch does not mean that it is wrong. > It is a procedural step that ispart of the "re-evaluation" process > for a patch that has become contested. It is important that we all follow > this procedure so that we can go forward to teh next step, > which is a technical discussion of the merrits > of the change. The changes in question just backed out. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020119181554.GL11604>