From owner-cvs-all Sat Jan 19 10:16:10 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F63D37B419; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 10:16:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0JIFtv12540; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 21:15:55 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 21:15:54 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" To: Julian Elischer Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , mark@grondar.za, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PAM pacthes we discuss Message-ID: <20020119181554.GL11604@nagual.pp.ru> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 09:53:02 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > Andrey, > The backing ou of a patch does not mean that it is wrong. > It is a procedural step that ispart of the "re-evaluation" process > for a patch that has become contested. It is important that we all follow > this procedure so that we can go forward to teh next step, > which is a technical discussion of the merrits > of the change. The changes in question just backed out. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message