From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 06:00:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 446A7106564A; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 06:00:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4D48FC12; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 06:00:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x220.ovitrap.com ([122.129.201.75]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q5560ooA016800; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 00:00:51 -0600 From: Erich To: Mark Andrews Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 13:00:45 +0700 Message-ID: <2188078.y2TVGRxzTH@x220.ovitrap.com> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.3 (Linux/3.3.7-1.fc16.x86_64; KDE/4.8.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20120605053316.CDE9A2145078@drugs.dv.isc.org> References: <2490439.EC638TI0j3@x220.ovitrap.com> <20120605053316.CDE9A2145078@drugs.dv.isc.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Chris Rees , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, "freebs @mail.isc.org>> Current FreeBSD" , "O. Hartmann" , Adam Strohl Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 06:00:55 -0000 Hi, On 05 June 2012 15:33:16 Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message <2490439.EC638TI0j3@x220.ovitrap.com>, Erich writes: > > Hi, > > > > On 05 June 2012 12:48:20 Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > > > In message <3506767.Fvm2KmtnYf@x220.ovitrap.com>, Erich writes: > > > > > > > > On 05 June 2012 11:24:25 Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's already there. If you want the ports as of FreeBSD 4.x EOL > > > then the tag is "RELEASE_4_EOL". If you want ports as of FreeBSD > > > 9.0 then the tag is "RELEASE_9_9_0". > > > > > I did not know this. Do you have a link for this? I never read about it. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html All of these, with the exception of HEAD (which is always a valid tag), only apply to the src/ tree. The ports/, doc/, and www/ trees are not branched. I understand this that I can use these tags on the FreeBSD sources but not on the ports. I never tried this on the ports. Erich