Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:35:31 -0800 From: Jose Quinteiro <freebsd@quinteiro.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Starting with poudriere Message-ID: <39fdf3ff-473b-ffb9-e64b-dce3cdcde56a@quinteiro.org> In-Reply-To: <CAK82gMF1O1EgBSW_hH_F-oPFOqx7iL-09ydi-myFUfhgyRYCFw@mail.gmail.com> References: <3743CEAE-BCC9-479E-8367-F3DA0E30496E@kreme.com> <4D118F32-E38F-4860-BBE8-4D9F259BF653@kreme.com> <CAK82gMF1O1EgBSW_hH_F-oPFOqx7iL-09ydi-myFUfhgyRYCFw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2020-02-15 20:43, Dan McGrath wrote: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 11:03 PM @lbutlr <kremels@kreme.com> wrote: > >> Let’s say I want to build and install a single port via poudrier. For the >> same of argument some port that has configuration options I want to change. >> > > Probably not ideal since you generally want to disable the FreeBSD > repository, and use only your poudriere repo, instead. You would need to > build everything you intend to install in the jail, however. While I > believe that you can enable multiple repositories (FreeBSD's, and your own > poudriere one), I am not sure about repo priorities, or how you would deal > with conflicts with build options that pull in common ports. It is > something I have been meaning to look into, sorry! Perhaps someone else > here can give some advice? > You can set priorities for remote package repositories in the repo's conf file. The default priority is 0, which is lowest. I plan to set up a repo with the ports I build with poudriere at a higher priority. Are there concerns with this approach? Thanks, Jose
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39fdf3ff-473b-ffb9-e64b-dce3cdcde56a>